C-Class (W202) 1995-2000: C 200 CDI, C 220 CDI, C 270 CDI, C 180, C 200 K,C 230 K, C 220, C230, C 280

New shocks + F&R Anti-Roll Bars = ride height higher, why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-28-2003, 12:27 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Mark-C230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 C230K
Unhappy New shocks + F&R Anti-Roll Bars = ride height higher, why?

All:

Need some info: I got my bilsteins and Anti-Roll bars installed.. but it looks as if my car got higher.. from no finger gap (with only my springs) to 2 finger gap (with full suspension??? Does the shock need a couple of days to set???? also.. in order to put the rear roll bar.. the subframe.. and stuff needed to be removed.. does the W202 have rear lower arms?? that possibly were not set back correctly... which makes the rear of the car higher??
Old 04-28-2003, 09:42 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
steve s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
that is a matter of fact on the bilstein shocks. they have a high-pressure nitrogen gas chamber (rather than low-pressure like those on koni). this chamber is know to raise cars an inch or so... yeah, the shocks need to set a little, but i doubt by much. some people get lowering springs with it so they don't notice much raise, but instead complain it doesn't lower according to the aftermarket claim...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New shocks + F&R Anti-Roll Bars = ride height higher, why?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.