C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Handling on 05 C230k is unbelievable!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-17-2005 | 07:47 PM
  #1  
caliboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Handling on 05 C230k is unbelievable!!!

Guys, I just drove my new car less than month old almost to a thousandk, at 120mph. Let me tell you, that I think the handling on this car is great. That amg suspension, 17 inch wheels, and amazing stability are out of this world!!!!! I think for all the criticism that mercedes used to get for it's poor handling non amg models, they've come a long way.
Old 03-17-2005 | 08:43 PM
  #2  
808_230K's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
'05 C230 coupe
until you crawl underneath and see that abyssmal pos they pass off as a rear sway bar ^_^

too much roll, but yes, the handling is competent
Old 03-17-2005 | 08:50 PM
  #3  
caliboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by 808_230K
until you crawl underneath and see that abyssmal pos they pass off as a rear sway bar ^_^

too much roll, but yes, the handling is competent
Lol, I'll check that out thanks for the tip! So you think it still has too much roll? I don't know, but compared to my old c230k and my friends 03 BMW 3 series, I think it's an improvement. It's just about as good as the old bimmers now-- don't you think?
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:05 PM
  #4  
mbny's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
08' BMW E92 Coupe
Originally Posted by caliboy
Lol, I'll check that out thanks for the tip! So you think it still has too much roll? I don't know, but compared to my old c230k and my friends 03 BMW 3 series, I think it's an improvement. It's just about as good as the old bimmers now-- don't you think?
nope. i have an 02' 330Ci and it handles better, but even i was impressed with the C230k's handling. it really has a more sporty feel to it. for the money, it's a great little car
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:07 PM
  #5  
nicedeboy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Dewey Beach, Delaware
Missing my beloved Benz
Going 120, I hope you get caught before killing other people. At that speed, your license should be taken from you!
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:08 PM
  #6  
mbny's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
08' BMW E92 Coupe
unless your friends car doesn't have the sport package w/ sport suspension. i don't know how well non-sport models handle. mine has the sport suspension w/ 17x7.5 wheels up front and 17x8.5 rears. i think non-sport coupes have 17x7's all around, not 100% sure on that though.
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:10 PM
  #7  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 6
From: Diamond Bar, CA
white and whiter
before you go tell other ppl that the suspension on the c230k ss are AMG tuned, they are not. These are only the advantgardge suspension MB throw on the Euro Advantgarde models. You have to get the AMG EVO pkg to get the full AMG upgraded suspension. The car sold in the U.S. are only fitted w/ the AMG appearance pkg along w/ the sport pkg.
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
808_230K's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
'05 C230 coupe
Originally Posted by caliboy
Lol, I'll check that out thanks for the tip! So you think it still has too much roll? I don't know, but compared to my old c230k and my friends 03 BMW 3 series, I think it's an improvement. It's just about as good as the old bimmers now-- don't you think?
the only other benz I've driven was the '04 coupe, and I gotta say that I did notice the difference in the steering/suspension, and it was really good. my friend's '05 330ci still corners better, IMO.

all things aside, I don't think I should be able to flex the swaybar with my hand ^_^ probably gonna get eibachs...
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:25 PM
  #9  
mbny's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
08' BMW E92 Coupe
Originally Posted by 808_230K
the only other benz I've driven was the '04 coupe, and I gotta say that I did notice the difference in the steering/suspension, and it was really good. my friend's '05 330ci still corners better, IMO.

all things aside, I don't think I should be able to flex the swaybar with my hand ^_^ probably gonna get eibachs...
does your friend have the ZHP coupe? ZHP performance package is a sweet car. suspension is better than my coupe with sport package. unfortunately they didn't have the performance package in 02' when i got my car. take a ride in the M3 if you get a chance. i thought my car handled amazing until i drove my cousins 04' M3 last summer. that thing makes my car feel like a lincoln town car. but the ride is much harsher as well.
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:42 PM
  #10  
gaogi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
2013 E350 Bluetec, 2008 Audi S4 Avant, 2011 VW Golf TDI, 2015 Audi S3, 2020 GLB250
Originally Posted by FrankW
before you go tell other ppl that the suspension on the c230k ss are AMG tuned, they are not. These are only the advantgardge suspension MB throw on the Euro Advantgarde models. You have to get the AMG EVO pkg to get the full AMG upgraded suspension. The car sold in the U.S. are only fitted w/ the AMG appearance pkg along w/ the sport pkg.
Here we go again.......slap a AMG emblem on it!
Old 03-17-2005 | 09:58 PM
  #11  
Jim Banville's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
Anyone know how the C class AMG suspension compares w/ the sport models as far as the actual parts? In other words, does the sport model use ANY of the same parts as the AMG? I'm only referring to the shocks, springs and swaybars.
Old 03-17-2005 | 11:30 PM
  #12  
dgwee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 1
From: Singapore
C180K
I have the '05 C180 Elegance and I find the handling already better than my '98 SLK200 .

Wish I have the chance to drive the SS, which is not available here. The AMG is beyond the reach of most of us here in Singapore due to the rediculous taxes .
Old 03-17-2005 | 11:38 PM
  #13  
Outland's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by 808_230K
until you crawl underneath and see that abyssmal pos they pass off as a rear sway bar ^_^

The stock setup rolls a little more to promote understeer, as oversteer is what tends to get inexperienced drivers in trouble.

Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
Old 03-18-2005 | 12:12 AM
  #14  
caliboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by Outland
The stock setup rolls a little more to promote understeer, as oversteer is what tends to get inexperienced drivers in trouble.

Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
I totally agree and as far as I know you guys might be right about the suspension not being amg on these new cars. I think on the sticker all it says is sport suspension, however, I have driven 03 nad 04 base bimmers non sport package and not M3 and I'm sorry to say guys I still have to disagree with those who say this new c class is not at least just as stable as those 3 series. Aside from amg cars this issssssss the best handling mb car I've driven including base e and clk's the 320's
Old 03-18-2005 | 02:28 AM
  #15  
ctC230K's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 2
From: Connecticut
excites your girlfriend
handling on my 05 c230k PWNS my 99 323i. no question.
oh and come on man, 120? you know this car could do 150 easliy, try harder next time!
Old 03-18-2005 | 04:40 AM
  #16  
caliboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by ctC230K
handling on my 05 c230k PWNS my 99 323i. no question.
oh and come on man, 120? you know this car could do 150 easliy, try harder next time!
Yeah you try >120 just after rush hour........lol it would definitely wake ur *** up!
Old 03-18-2005 | 08:35 AM
  #17  
Capt Nemo o2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
Originally Posted by Outland
The stock setup rolls a little more to promote understeer, as oversteer is what tends to get inexperienced drivers in trouble.

Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
Huh... Interesting! I would definately much rather have oversteer than understeer... You can learn to control oversteer and use it to your advantage increasing your cornering speed. Thats how the original 427 Cobras raced... Run to the limit of traction, and when you feel the back sliding, let it slide till the car points where you want to go then straighten out the wheels and gun it... But that was beacuse the car has no spoiler and gets squirily at speeds...

What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
Old 03-18-2005 | 08:51 AM
  #18  
tommy's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 10
From: Westwood, NJ
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
For the money, the AMG bars. But I'd recommend looking at the H&R and Eibach bars also - a little more money, but much better handling. If you're gonna do it, do it right.
Old 03-18-2005 | 01:26 PM
  #19  
trench's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Originally Posted by Jim Banville
Anyone know how the C class AMG suspension compares w/ the sport models as far as the actual parts? In other words, does the sport model use ANY of the same parts as the AMG? I'm only referring to the shocks, springs and swaybars.
I was under the impression that the 2004.5 and up sport sedans (but not the coupes) now use the same swaybars as the AMG, but that the shocks and springs are different.
Old 03-18-2005 | 11:09 PM
  #20  
808_230K's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
'05 C230 coupe
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
Huh... Interesting! I would definately much rather have oversteer than understeer... You can learn to control oversteer and use it to your advantage increasing your cornering speed. Thats how the original 427 Cobras raced... Run to the limit of traction, and when you feel the back sliding, let it slide till the car points where you want to go then straighten out the wheels and gun it... But that was beacuse the car has no spoiler and gets squirily at speeds...

What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?

true, but that bit of understeer is considered 'safer' than spinning the car for joe average commuter. I'm a good driver, but far from a racer... but at least with a matched set of stiffer sways should help it corner flatter, which is basically all that I'm looking for, other than that, she's a joy to drive
Old 03-19-2005 | 12:09 AM
  #21  
Capt Nemo o2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
I know, that understeer is usually safer, and is safer for the average driver, but if I was going to upgrade the suspension, I would set it up to have as little understeer as possible, and possibly some eversteer. If I'm going for handling, might as well do it right! One of the reasons why I would want some oversteer is you can control it if you learn. When you have understeer, there is not much you can do once your at that point. I have been in situations where understeer could have caused an accident because the car wont turn where it needs to to avoid an obsitcle, and then because the front wheels broke loose, I lost almost all steering ability. This was in a Jeep by the way and there is not much you can do to make that car oversteer, and the obsticle was some guy that went the wrong way around a traffic circle. Luckily since it was such a sharp turn at about 40mph the rear end eventually broke loose and I skidded sideways and gunned it to get out of the way. That was some fancy driving right there, thankfully it only cost me a pair of boxers!
Old 03-19-2005 | 12:38 AM
  #22  
Outland's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
Huh... Interesting! I would definately much rather have oversteer than understeer... You can learn to control oversteer and use it to your advantage increasing your cornering speed.
Wouldn't we all. But like I said, this is for the benefit of the driver(who doesn't leave the road *** first and MB(not getting sued by asswhipe driver after he goes off the road)


Personally, a neutrally handling car is what I'd shoot for. Induce the oversteer with the throttle. The AMG sways for a standard or sport model are a definate bang for your buck contender.
Old 03-19-2005 | 12:50 AM
  #23  
ctC230K's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 2
From: Connecticut
excites your girlfriend
so does the 05 c230 have c32 sways or what?
Old 03-19-2005 | 02:00 AM
  #24  
Vader13's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
W211 E55 AMG, ML63 AMG, Past 996GT3,ZCPM3,Brabus C32,ML 500
I have a C32 and a 04 C230K sedan SS

I can say that the C230K does feel like it handled better out of the box than the C32..
The C32 is a little "Floaty" stock
The C230K is tighter.



Now the brakes are not the same at all, they are 13's but not even close to the stopping power of the C32 setup.

The sways on the C32 are beefier that the dinky *** C230K sways, but not by much.
Old 03-19-2005 | 03:38 AM
  #25  
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,925
Likes: 123
From: So. Oregon Coast
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
Thumbs up

I agree. The 2005 model has the best stock suspension ever, the way it shoulda been. Well, i drovge a sedan, loaner.
It was tight. But rode well. My car with it's springs and sways, well you feel every little bump. Yeh, 2005 best to date.
Feels a lot like a bimmer, and prefect mix of performance and
ride.
And with the upgraded suspension and brakes, a good deal.
I got 2 grand in those upgrades, and it's not counted in the
value on KBB.

Last edited by C230 Sport Coup; 03-19-2005 at 03:41 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Handling on 05 C230k is unbelievable!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.