Handling on 05 C230k is unbelievable!!!
#1
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Handling on 05 C230k is unbelievable!!!
Guys, I just drove my new car less than month old almost to a thousandk, at 120mph. Let me tell you, that I think the handling on this car is great. That amg suspension, 17 inch wheels, and amazing stability are out of this world!!!!! I think for all the criticism that mercedes used to get for it's poor handling non amg models, they've come a long way.
#3
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by 808_230K
until you crawl underneath and see that abyssmal pos they pass off as a rear sway bar ^_^
too much roll, but yes, the handling is competent
too much roll, but yes, the handling is competent
#4
Originally Posted by caliboy
Lol, I'll check that out thanks for the tip! So you think it still has too much roll? I don't know, but compared to my old c230k and my friends 03 BMW 3 series, I think it's an improvement. It's just about as good as the old bimmers now-- don't you think?
#6
unless your friends car doesn't have the sport package w/ sport suspension. i don't know how well non-sport models handle. mine has the sport suspension w/ 17x7.5 wheels up front and 17x8.5 rears. i think non-sport coupes have 17x7's all around, not 100% sure on that though.
#7
before you go tell other ppl that the suspension on the c230k ss are AMG tuned, they are not. These are only the advantgardge suspension MB throw on the Euro Advantgarde models. You have to get the AMG EVO pkg to get the full AMG upgraded suspension. The car sold in the U.S. are only fitted w/ the AMG appearance pkg along w/ the sport pkg.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by caliboy
Lol, I'll check that out thanks for the tip! So you think it still has too much roll? I don't know, but compared to my old c230k and my friends 03 BMW 3 series, I think it's an improvement. It's just about as good as the old bimmers now-- don't you think?
all things aside, I don't think I should be able to flex the swaybar with my hand ^_^ probably gonna get eibachs...
#9
Originally Posted by 808_230K
the only other benz I've driven was the '04 coupe, and I gotta say that I did notice the difference in the steering/suspension, and it was really good. my friend's '05 330ci still corners better, IMO.
all things aside, I don't think I should be able to flex the swaybar with my hand ^_^ probably gonna get eibachs...
all things aside, I don't think I should be able to flex the swaybar with my hand ^_^ probably gonna get eibachs...
#10
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
2013 E350 Bluetec, 2008 Audi S4 Avant, 2011 VW Golf TDI, 2015 Audi S3, 2020 GLB250
Originally Posted by FrankW
before you go tell other ppl that the suspension on the c230k ss are AMG tuned, they are not. These are only the advantgardge suspension MB throw on the Euro Advantgarde models. You have to get the AMG EVO pkg to get the full AMG upgraded suspension. The car sold in the U.S. are only fitted w/ the AMG appearance pkg along w/ the sport pkg.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
Anyone know how the C class AMG suspension compares w/ the sport models as far as the actual parts? In other words, does the sport model use ANY of the same parts as the AMG? I'm only referring to the shocks, springs and swaybars.
#12
I have the '05 C180 Elegance and I find the handling already better than my '98 SLK200 .
Wish I have the chance to drive the SS, which is not available here. The AMG is beyond the reach of most of us here in Singapore due to the rediculous taxes .
Wish I have the chance to drive the SS, which is not available here. The AMG is beyond the reach of most of us here in Singapore due to the rediculous taxes .
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by 808_230K
until you crawl underneath and see that abyssmal pos they pass off as a rear sway bar ^_^
Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
#14
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by Outland
The stock setup rolls a little more to promote understeer, as oversteer is what tends to get inexperienced drivers in trouble.
Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
#16
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2012 Cls 63 amg, 2006 Bmw M6
Originally Posted by ctC230K
handling on my 05 c230k PWNS my 99 323i. no question.
oh and come on man, 120? you know this car could do 150 easliy, try harder next time!
oh and come on man, 120? you know this car could do 150 easliy, try harder next time!
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
Originally Posted by Outland
The stock setup rolls a little more to promote understeer, as oversteer is what tends to get inexperienced drivers in trouble.
Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
Personally, the Sport models(Coupe and the SS) 05 C Class is the best handling Benz Ive ever been in. Easily a match for the current 'base' 3 series, and certainly more stable on the highway. Add some stiffer sway bars, and I'd bet it can outsnake the old C32.
What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
#18
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 10
From: Westwood, NJ
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
#19
Originally Posted by Jim Banville
Anyone know how the C class AMG suspension compares w/ the sport models as far as the actual parts? In other words, does the sport model use ANY of the same parts as the AMG? I'm only referring to the shocks, springs and swaybars.
#20
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
Huh... Interesting! I would definately much rather have oversteer than understeer... You can learn to control oversteer and use it to your advantage increasing your cornering speed. Thats how the original 427 Cobras raced... Run to the limit of traction, and when you feel the back sliding, let it slide till the car points where you want to go then straighten out the wheels and gun it... But that was beacuse the car has no spoiler and gets squirily at speeds...
What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
What would be the best bang for the buck as far as handling goes? Rear anti-roll bar?
true, but that bit of understeer is considered 'safer' than spinning the car for joe average commuter. I'm a good driver, but far from a racer... but at least with a matched set of stiffer sways should help it corner flatter, which is basically all that I'm looking for, other than that, she's a joy to drive
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
I know, that understeer is usually safer, and is safer for the average driver, but if I was going to upgrade the suspension, I would set it up to have as little understeer as possible, and possibly some eversteer. If I'm going for handling, might as well do it right! One of the reasons why I would want some oversteer is you can control it if you learn. When you have understeer, there is not much you can do once your at that point. I have been in situations where understeer could have caused an accident because the car wont turn where it needs to to avoid an obsitcle, and then because the front wheels broke loose, I lost almost all steering ability. This was in a Jeep by the way and there is not much you can do to make that car oversteer, and the obsticle was some guy that went the wrong way around a traffic circle. Luckily since it was such a sharp turn at about 40mph the rear end eventually broke loose and I skidded sideways and gunned it to get out of the way. That was some fancy driving right there, thankfully it only cost me a pair of boxers!
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by Capt Nemo o2
Huh... Interesting! I would definately much rather have oversteer than understeer... You can learn to control oversteer and use it to your advantage increasing your cornering speed.
Personally, a neutrally handling car is what I'd shoot for. Induce the oversteer with the throttle. The AMG sways for a standard or sport model are a definate bang for your buck contender.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
W211 E55 AMG, ML63 AMG, Past 996GT3,ZCPM3,Brabus C32,ML 500
I have a C32 and a 04 C230K sedan SS
I can say that the C230K does feel like it handled better out of the box than the C32..
The C32 is a little "Floaty" stock
The C230K is tighter.
Now the brakes are not the same at all, they are 13's but not even close to the stopping power of the C32 setup.
The sways on the C32 are beefier that the dinky *** C230K sways, but not by much.
I can say that the C230K does feel like it handled better out of the box than the C32..
The C32 is a little "Floaty" stock
The C230K is tighter.
Now the brakes are not the same at all, they are 13's but not even close to the stopping power of the C32 setup.
The sways on the C32 are beefier that the dinky *** C230K sways, but not by much.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,925
Likes: 123
From: So. Oregon Coast
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
I agree. The 2005 model has the best stock suspension ever, the way it shoulda been. Well, i drovge a sedan, loaner.
It was tight. But rode well. My car with it's springs and sways, well you feel every little bump. Yeh, 2005 best to date.
Feels a lot like a bimmer, and prefect mix of performance and
ride.
And with the upgraded suspension and brakes, a good deal.
I got 2 grand in those upgrades, and it's not counted in the
value on KBB.
It was tight. But rode well. My car with it's springs and sways, well you feel every little bump. Yeh, 2005 best to date.
Feels a lot like a bimmer, and prefect mix of performance and
ride.
And with the upgraded suspension and brakes, a good deal.
I got 2 grand in those upgrades, and it's not counted in the
value on KBB.
Last edited by C230 Sport Coup; 03-19-2005 at 03:41 AM.