C320 great performance
10-09-2002, 09:37 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buick Park Avenue Ultra
If you learn how to crop a picture, yes. 
EDIT: hahaha WHOOPS! This message was in reference to your "hot or not" link and text, Timmy.
haha Excuse my insanity,
Tim
EDIT: hahaha WHOOPS! This message was in reference to your "hot or not" link and text, Timmy.
haha Excuse my insanity,
Tim
Last edited by timorgan; 10-09-2002 at 09:52 PM.
10-09-2002, 09:46 PM
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
10-09-2002, 10:06 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
Originally posted by timorgan
If you learn how to crop a picture, yes.
EDIT: hahaha WHOOPS! This message was in reference to your "hot or not" link and text, Timmy.
haha Excuse my insanity,
Tim
If you learn how to crop a picture, yes.
EDIT: hahaha WHOOPS! This message was in reference to your "hot or not" link and text, Timmy.
haha Excuse my insanity,
Tim
10-10-2002, 02:59 PM
#7
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FrankW
car and driver, or someone tested the C320 in 6.6 second 0-60 mph versus 330i at 6.6, and X-type 3.0 at 6.5 seconds.
car and driver, or someone tested the C320 in 6.6 second 0-60 mph versus 330i at 6.6, and X-type 3.0 at 6.5 seconds.
no car and drier test it 7.6
i have the magazine here the new one
so wats the real 0-60 then?
is it faster than CLk320?the new one imean the 2003 CLk320
MB lists 2003 CLk320 0-60 = 7.4 automtaic
but they list CLk320 0-60 = 6.9>>>>but they dont indicate whether its auto or manual
so wats the real 0-60 of auto CLk320?
Trending Topics
10-10-2002, 04:12 PM
#8
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by vodc4
\
no car and drier test it 7.6
i have the magazine here the new one
so wats the real 0-60 then?
is it faster than CLk320?the new one imean the 2003 CLk320
MB lists 2003 CLk320 0-60 = 7.4 automtaic
but they list CLk320 0-60 = 6.9>>>>but they dont indicate whether its auto or manual
so wats the real 0-60 of auto CLk320?
\
no car and drier test it 7.6
i have the magazine here the new one
so wats the real 0-60 then?
is it faster than CLk320?the new one imean the 2003 CLk320
MB lists 2003 CLk320 0-60 = 7.4 automtaic
but they list CLk320 0-60 = 6.9>>>>but they dont indicate whether its auto or manual
so wats the real 0-60 of auto CLk320?
btw CLK does not come with a manual transmission, at least not in the states anyway.
Last edited by FrankW; 10-10-2002 at 04:33 PM.
10-10-2002, 05:17 PM
#9
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh sorry2.....
i mean CLk 320 is 7.4 auto
and C-CLASS C320 is 6.9 but they dont indicate its auto or manual
so wats the correct 0-60 tine for a C320?auto
thanks
im just wondering which ine would be faster
C-class c320 or CLk 320
i mean CLk 320 is 7.4 auto
and C-CLASS C320 is 6.9 but they dont indicate its auto or manual
so wats the correct 0-60 tine for a C320?auto
thanks
im just wondering which ine would be faster
C-class c320 or CLk 320
10-10-2002, 06:44 PM
#10
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by vodc4
oh sorry2.....
i mean CLk 320 is 7.4 auto
and C-CLASS C320 is 6.9 but they dont indicate its auto or manual
so wats the correct 0-60 tine for a C320?auto
thanks
im just wondering which ine would be faster
C-class c320 or CLk 320
oh sorry2.....
i mean CLk 320 is 7.4 auto
and C-CLASS C320 is 6.9 but they dont indicate its auto or manual
so wats the correct 0-60 tine for a C320?auto
thanks
im just wondering which ine would be faster
C-class c320 or CLk 320
the C320 will likely be faster because of the extra weight the CLK320 carries.
Last edited by FrankW; 10-10-2002 at 06:52 PM.
10-10-2002, 10:44 PM
#13
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by eason
I think the number from the MB web site is the most accurate, because I got the same 0-60mph time in my C230K as the time MB stated.
I think the number from the MB web site is the most accurate, because I got the same 0-60mph time in my C230K as the time MB stated.
the time MB post for the 01 C320 is 6.9 sec 0-60 mph.
10-12-2002, 09:31 AM
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C320
320 o-60
The 2001 320 will get it done in the 6.8 to 7.0 range. They changed the rear end ratios in 2002 for better economy and less engine /road noise. This means the 2002 and 2003 320s are a few ticks slower. I raced my friend 2001 vs 2002 and pulled him 4+ car lengths to 60.
