Why no C-Class Kompressors after 2005?
I'd love to see if anyone could show that quality and price of parts is different on different versions of the same engine.
Kleeman solves that problem with software upgrade...and likely fuel mileage loss.
C180 9.5:1
C200 8.5:1
C230 8.7:1
Besides what's already been said, I have 110,000+ miles on my Kompressor and it runs as good, if not better than it did when I bought it new. I have only had issues with my A/C compressor and it's safety sprocket (It continues to break)......Other than that, I drive my cars fairly hard, without abusing them. I still have the factory clutch and I have launched this car quite a few times....NO oil leaks with very acceptable oil consumption (1 qt per 12K miles)
I think it's a strong motor for what it has to move and it definitely helps to have the a little more balance with the 200lbs of "V-6" weight, not up in the front...
I would like some more power and I've given some thought to buying Kleeman's header and other mods, but the bang for your buck just doesn't make sense...
GREAT ENGINE though and I've driven the c240 as well as the 06 C230 V6 and still think my little 4cyl is nicer.





I know I prefer my M271 and I also got the last year for Black Opal on a C.




garner so much attention.
De-evolutionary

But then I am guilty as well for being masterly baited....




But then Europe has higher octane gas than we do...
but higher compression for LESS power?
WTF?




The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I4 1.8L. So, in the UK, the C230 coupe is still an M271?
Interesting, here in the states they went to a V6 as C230.
C180 Komp
C200 Komp
C230 V6
C350
C200CDI
C220CDI
I drove a 2007 C230 V6, and it was very nice. Unfortunately, I still preferred my 2005 4-cylinder C230K. The power was more immediate on acceleration, and it just felt better to drive. Add to that about 3 mpg better fuel economy, and the 4-cylinder makes better since for me.



