C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe
View Poll Results: Would You Buy a Diesel?
Put me on the waiting list!
23
41.07%
Would strongly consider it
17
30.36%
Possibly
7
12.50%
Diesel.... Ugghhhh
9
16.07%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Who Here Would Consider Buying a Diesel C-Class?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-21-2002, 02:57 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Apollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E320 CDI Elegance auto
Originally posted by AndrewK
6.8 seconds is not that good? Keep in mind thats 0-100 km/h (so maybe 6.6 0-60 mph).
Not that good!, bloody hell what do you expect from a diesel. Its not just the 0-60. My car keeps pulling all the way to 130 mph and probably beyond, but thats as far as I have taken it.
I would not be suprised with the way they are progressing if in a few years diesels out perform petrols.
Old 12-21-2002, 03:07 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AndrewK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4
Originally posted by Apollo
Not that good!, bloody hell what do you expect from a diesel. Its not just the 0-60. My car keeps pulling all the way to 130 mph and probably beyond, but thats as far as I have taken it.
I would not be suprised with the way they are progressing if in a few years diesels out perform petrols.
You are misunderstanding me! 6.8 seconds is great, I was just questioning FrankW's claim that it wasnt!

6.8 IS GOOD!
Old 12-21-2002, 05:36 PM
  #28  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by AndrewK
6.8 seconds is not that good? Keep in mind thats 0-100 km/h (so maybe 6.6 0-60 mph).
6.6 second 0-60 mph is C320, 330i, and A4 3.0's time. With more hp and a lot more torque coming from the 3.0 liter 5 cyclinder turbo diesel engine. The time should be better than the trio. With all that power, i would expect at least something like 6 second flat 0-60 time. unless the car really has hard time putting the power down.

Last edited by FrankW; 12-21-2002 at 05:56 PM.
Old 12-21-2002, 05:52 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Apollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E320 CDI Elegance auto
Originally posted by AndrewK
You are misunderstanding me! 6.8 seconds is great, I was just questioning FrankW's claim that it wasnt!

6.8 IS GOOD!
Sorry Andrew, teach me to read properly before reacting
Old 12-21-2002, 06:08 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AndrewK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4
Originally posted by Apollo
Sorry Andrew, teach me to read properly before reacting
I didnt exactly phrase it all that well, and if someone was to miss the question mark it would reverse the meaning of the whole statement.
Old 12-21-2002, 06:28 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Matt230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C300 4matic
That is a very good time, although it does seem a little slow for that amount of torque. But I bet it feels faster because of this torque. I don't race too much, so I would be fine with a car that feels fast rather than one that actually is fast, but doesn't feel like it. I like cars with lots of torque.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Who Here Would Consider Buying a Diesel C-Class?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.