C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

2002 C230 vs 2003 C230

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-25-2010 | 04:09 PM
  #1  
kLeos's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
2003 c230K Coupe
2002 C230 vs 2003 C230

I was wondering, which one would you say is better.
Old 07-25-2010 | 04:13 PM
  #2  
04mbc230's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Cali
2006 C230 Sedan
Originally Posted by kLeos
I was wondering, which one would you say is better.
Don't want to be an A$$. I say 2004. Reason = updated enginee. But of course some would say first year edition is not the best, then with that in mind 2007!!

Usually, the latter editions is better than the previous. Just to answer you question, I would say 2003, but then there are 7 years afterwards that has improved in enginee technology.
Old 07-25-2010 | 04:16 PM
  #3  
kLeos's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
2003 c230K Coupe
the reason I'm asking is because I just had an 03 c230k which was totaled and i'm looking at a 02 C230K that's for sale with about the same mileage as mine and it's also cheaper so I'm trying to decide if i should jump on it or not.
Old 07-25-2010 | 05:32 PM
  #4  
LILBENZ230's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 798
2019 G70 6MT & 2022 Ford Maverick XL
Originally Posted by 04mbc230
Don't want to be an A$$. I say 2004. Reason = updated enginee.
The 2003, 2004, and 2005 C230K cars have the same engine - the M271. The 2003 and 2004 cars have been known to have some head issues.

If you can swing it the best W203s are the 2005-2007 cars. The vast majority of the bugs were worked out by then. If not, I'd get a 2002. The M111 is a rough engine but is very tough and early M271s can be sketchy.
Old 07-25-2010 | 06:28 PM
  #5  
04mbc230's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Cali
2006 C230 Sedan
Originally Posted by LILBENZ230
The 2003, 2004, and 2005 C230K cars have the same engine - the M271. The 2003 and 2004 cars have been known to have some head issues.

If you can swing it the best W203s are the 2005-2007 cars. The vast majority of the bugs were worked out by then. If not, I'd get a 2002. The M111 is a rough engine but is very tough and early M271s can be sketchy.
So 2001 & 2002 is a different enginee? Yea, I thought I read something about 2003-2005 has a quietier enginee than 2002 and previous.

Also 2006 is changed with a V6 enginee.
Old 07-25-2010 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
LILBENZ230's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 798
2019 G70 6MT & 2022 Ford Maverick XL
Originally Posted by 04mbc230
So 2001 & 2002 is a different enginee? Yea, I thought I read something about 2003-2005 has a quietier enginee than 2002 and previous.

Also 2006 is changed with a V6 enginee.
2002 = M111 2.3L Supercharged 4
2003-2005 = M271 1.8L Supercharged 4
2006-2007 = M272 2.5L V6
Old 07-25-2010 | 07:57 PM
  #7  
04mbc230's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Cali
2006 C230 Sedan
Unhappy

Originally Posted by LILBENZ230
The 2003, 2004, and 2005 C230K cars have the same engine - the M271. The 2003 and 2004 cars have been known to have some head issues.

If you can swing it the best W203s are the 2005-2007 cars. The vast majority of the bugs were worked out by then. If not, I'd get a 2002. The M111 is a rough engine but is very tough and early M271s can be sketchy.
Oh by the way. That's not good news you just stated there .

I have a 2004 model.

Hmmz.. I wonder if I can trade that in for a 2005 or even 2006 (long shot).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2002 C230 vs 2003 C230



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.