C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Somehting i came across this weekend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-31-2011, 11:36 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
eesjunin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunstable, ,Ma
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nowhere ...Fast
Somehting i came across this weekend

So Ryan came by, C280AF, and he was going to chnage his spark plugs...now he has a 2006 c280 and i have 2002 c320...both 6 cylinders but mine had 12 plugs vs, a we found out, his had only 6...something for other to know
but how come did mb went this way? and what is the benefit of 12 vs 6?
Old 05-31-2011, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech

M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.

M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
Old 05-31-2011, 12:40 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
eesjunin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunstable, ,Ma
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nowhere ...Fast
ah...so which one is better for response, power , efficiency?
Old 05-31-2011, 06:41 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
glocati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 ML350
Originally Posted by TruTaing
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech

M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.

M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
Exactly.

As far as efficiency, the m272 wins. Although a great engine, the m112 was not all that fuel efficient.

here's a good read on the differences:

http://www.mercedestechstore.com/pdf...2008-05-04.pdf

Last edited by glocati; 05-31-2011 at 06:51 PM.
Old 05-31-2011, 07:38 PM
  #5  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
Whhatttt??? do all m272s come standard w/ the speed sensitive power steering?!
Old 06-01-2011, 01:49 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
phister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
06 C230 SS 6spd
Also the M272 engine was the first mb engine to have a constant variable valve timing controller. Or as Honda people call it Vtec and Toyota call VVTi. Mb somewhat caught up to Japan engine building IMO.
Old 06-01-2011, 02:12 AM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
VTEC is a little different, it varies both valve timing and lift, which a lot of systems don't. It's also a phase system, essentially letting an engine swap between 2 cam profiles, one conservative and the other more agressive for high rpm performance.

I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
Old 06-01-2011, 04:14 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
glocati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 ML350
Originally Posted by TruTaing
Whhatttt??? do all m272s come standard w/ the speed sensitive power steering?!
I do not know, John. The tech article certainly touts its availability, but not sure if that extends to all platforms that use the m272s?
Old 06-01-2011, 04:57 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
phister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
06 C230 SS 6spd
Originally Posted by e1000
VTEC is a little different, it varies both valve timing and lift, which a lot of systems don't. It's also a phase system, essentially letting an engine swap between 2 cam profiles, one conservative and the other more agressive for high rpm performance.

I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
simple probably but not a continuous variable valve timing control.
Old 06-01-2011, 06:24 PM
  #10  
Member
 
c240DUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2002 C240 (SOLD), 2006 E350
Interesting thread here.
Old 06-02-2011, 09:49 PM
  #11  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
eesjunin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunstable, ,Ma
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nowhere ...Fast
Very interesting, although i find that a bit odd...that having 4 valves 1 spark plug vs 3 valves and spark plugs per cylinderwould make a more efficient...would the greater spark plugs give you a cleaner burn, hence higher efficiency, hence higher response...not an expert here
Originally Posted by TruTaing
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech

M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.

M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
Old 06-02-2011, 10:05 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Silver C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
Junin, *at that time*, twin plugs does provide better efficiency and cleaner burn etc etc. But as time goes by, MB redesigned the engine (thus a different engine code), and made out with better performance, with less plugs.
Old 06-02-2011, 11:17 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Norwichdelta06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 c230
Originally Posted by Silver C
Junin, *at that time*, twin plugs does provide better efficiency and cleaner burn etc etc. But as time goes by, MB redesigned the engine (thus a different engine code), and made out with better performance, with less plugs.

or maybe more efficient plugs?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Somehting i came across this weekend



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.