Somehting i came across this weekend
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunstable, ,Ma
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nowhere ...Fast
Somehting i came across this weekend
So Ryan came by, C280AF, and he was going to chnage his spark plugs...now he has a 2006 c280 and i have 2002 c320...both 6 cylinders but mine had 12 plugs vs, a we found out, his had only 6...something for other to know
but how come did mb went this way? and what is the benefit of 12 vs 6?
but how come did mb went this way? and what is the benefit of 12 vs 6?
#2
Moderator Alumni
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2013 ML350
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
As far as efficiency, the m272 wins. Although a great engine, the m112 was not all that fuel efficient.
here's a good read on the differences:
http://www.mercedestechstore.com/pdf...2008-05-04.pdf
Last edited by glocati; 05-31-2011 at 06:51 PM.
#5
Moderator Alumni
Originally Posted by glocati
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
8 Posts
06 C230 SS 6spd
Also the M272 engine was the first mb engine to have a constant variable valve timing controller. Or as Honda people call it Vtec and Toyota call VVTi. Mb somewhat caught up to Japan engine building IMO.
#7
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
VTEC is a little different, it varies both valve timing and lift, which a lot of systems don't. It's also a phase system, essentially letting an engine swap between 2 cam profiles, one conservative and the other more agressive for high rpm performance.
I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
8 Posts
06 C230 SS 6spd
VTEC is a little different, it varies both valve timing and lift, which a lot of systems don't. It's also a phase system, essentially letting an engine swap between 2 cam profiles, one conservative and the other more agressive for high rpm performance.
I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
I believe Mercedes was actually the first to develop simple variable valve timiing. Wayyyyyy before Honda or any other japanese manufacturer.
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunstable, ,Ma
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nowhere ...Fast
Very interesting, although i find that a bit odd...that having 4 valves 1 spark plug vs 3 valves and spark plugs per cylinderwould make a more efficient...would the greater spark plugs give you a cleaner burn, hence higher efficiency, hence higher response...not an expert here
M112 vs M272 - Old tech vs new tech
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
M112 (v6s before 2006) had two plugs per cylinder with 3 valves (two intake, one exhaust) - IIRC, the reasoning for two plugs per cyl were to create a cleaner burn for fuel efficiency.
M272 (v6s from 2006+) had only one plug per cylinder to make room for 4 valves.
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C240
Junin, *at that time*, twin plugs does provide better efficiency and cleaner burn etc etc. But as time goes by, MB redesigned the engine (thus a different engine code), and made out with better performance, with less plugs.
#13