C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

03 C320 sport sedan vs. 01 C320 sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-18-2003 | 11:12 PM
  #1  
pmonag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
c 320 sport
03 C320 sport sedan vs. 01 C320 sport

OK, I've been reading about the 03 c320 sport sedan - I have a 01 c320 sport. What's the difference - it seems like everybody thinks this is a new version of the c320 but isn't it very similar to the 01 c320 sport? Only differences I can see is the standard 6 speed manual(vs. automatic in 01) and standard 17 inch alloys(vs 16 inch in 01). Can anyone enlighten me on this one? TIA
Old 07-19-2003 | 07:30 AM
  #2  
amdeutsch's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,731
Likes: 30
From: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Re: 03 C320 sport sedan vs. 01 C320 sport

Originally posted by pmonag
OK, I've been reading about the 03 c320 sport sedan - I have a 01 c320 sport. What's the difference - it seems like everybody thinks this is a new version of the c320 but isn't it very similar to the 01 c320 sport? Only differences I can see is the standard 6 speed manual(vs. automatic in 01) and standard 17 inch alloys(vs 16 inch in 01). Can anyone enlighten me on this one? TIA
I do believe you also got full leather instead of leather seating inserts. There most likely also is a suspension difference. Lets not forget the cost factor. Back then it cost ~$3000 for the package whereas now you specify either luxury or sport at the same price.
Old 07-19-2003 | 09:37 AM
  #3  
pokerFACE's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
well, theoretically the 03 would be better off than an 01 because the first year run bugs would have been ironed out...
Old 07-19-2003 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
pmonag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
c 320 sport
Is there truly a suspension difference between the two cars? Can anyone confirm this? Maybe I should take one out for a spin to confirm for myself...
Old 07-19-2003 | 12:58 PM
  #5  
SiLenXtaCe's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
blk thing
there is a difference in suspension setup...

2001 front : macpherson strut type
rear : multi-link

2003 front : 3-link
rear : 5-arm link (got it from mbusa website)
Old 07-19-2003 | 01:48 PM
  #6  
Mike T.'s Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
VA Fahrwerk

Originally posted by SiLenXtaCe
there is a difference in suspension setup...

2001 front : macpherson strut type
rear : multi-link

2003 front : 3-link
rear : 5-arm link (got it from mbusa website)
The so-called 3-link front end and MacPherson strut front end are the same thing. The first link is the strut at the top of the spring; the other two are the two ends of the A-arm. Same with the rear - since the 190, M-B has used a five-link design. I'm not sure why M-B implies there's a difference in design, because there is not.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 03 C320 sport sedan vs. 01 C320 sport



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.