Replace M45 S/C with M65?
02-25-2004, 12:13 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C230
Well, the M65 is similar to M45
In dimensions at least. It's a 1liter displacement instead of .75.
Even if we keep the RPM the same we should see 25% more airflow into the engine, right?
CZ
Even if we keep the RPM the same we should see 25% more airflow into the engine, right?
CZ
02-25-2004, 12:52 PM
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Encino
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230K
at the upper operating range you see about 25% more cfm of flow. at the lower range it's closer to 10%. likewise, any power gain would be minimal at lower revs, and greater up top.
02-25-2004, 02:20 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by dswildfire
at the upper operating range you see about 25% more cfm of flow. at the lower range it's closer to 10%. likewise, any power gain would be minimal at lower revs, and greater up top.
at the upper operating range you see about 25% more cfm of flow. at the lower range it's closer to 10%. likewise, any power gain would be minimal at lower revs, and greater up top.
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
