2003 C230 engine head removed
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Lewisville (DFW area), TX
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C230 Kompressor
2003 C230 engine head removed
I'm having the head reconditioned and valves as well, due to the constant misfire on piston 4. Is there anything I should be aware of or watch out for?
Is there anything specific that would cause the pistons to be so dirty? I bought the car at 87,000 and it has 140,000. Used only premium gas, as well as regular use of Techron.
Thanks.
Is there anything specific that would cause the pistons to be so dirty? I bought the car at 87,000 and it has 140,000. Used only premium gas, as well as regular use of Techron.
Thanks.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
The two on the left look pretty normal to me. The two on the right might be because of some valve stem seal oil leak? Or maybe they got soaked during the head removal.
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Lewisville (DFW area), TX
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C230 Kompressor
Thanks for your reply. Actually, the far right is piston 4, the one I keep getting misfires on. Nothing got soaked during the head removal. I guess I'll just clean the piston heads and hope for the best after the engine head gets re-done.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
You can also do a leakdown test after the head is on. - Will show you if the rings are worn (since the valves will be new
) But that should not lead to misfires anyway.
Just noticed - is the lower-right valve cracked at the top? two marks at 11 o'clock.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Just noticed - is the lower-right valve cracked at the top? two marks at 11 o'clock.
#6
Super Member
I'm having the head reconditioned and valves as well, due to the constant misfire on piston 4. Is there anything I should be aware of or watch out for?
Is there anything specific that would cause the pistons to be so dirty? I bought the car at 87,000 and it has 140,000. Used only premium gas, as well as regular use of Techron.Thanks.
Is there anything specific that would cause the pistons to be so dirty? I bought the car at 87,000 and it has 140,000. Used only premium gas, as well as regular use of Techron.Thanks.
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
1) Looks like you had a head gasket problem between #3 and #4. That's oil, coolant, carbon build-up on the pistons.
2) Ask a thousand people and you'll get a thousand different answers.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
3) I've done 100% complete engine rebuilds many times, and have been working on cars for over 20 years.
4) There is not a 100% correct answer.
5) What *I* have done, and many others, is something similar to the following:
a) You're going to be turning the engine crank. If you're not comfortable with being able to find the correct TDC, then do NOT do the following! On a 4-stroke engine, a piston is at TDC for both the compression and exhaust cycles. When putting on the timing chain back on, the phase needs to be correct.
b) Spray WD 40 on the cylinder walls with the piston all the way down.
c) Rotate the piston all the way up.
d) Mask off (very well) the top holes and the edge of the piston and the cylinder wall.
e) This depends on how good/experienced you are. Gently use a scraper or wire brush to get the carbon/etc off the piston. Be careful to not gouge the piston. If your finger nail doesn't catch in the "gouge/scratch", then it's fine.
f) Use a shop vac while you're scraping!
g) Use Acetone to clean up the piston afterwards.
h) CLEAN the area VERY well.
i) Use the shop vac around the piston to suck up anything.
j) Slowly rotate the piston down. Stop a few times on the way down. Clean the walls, and use the shop vac to clean the piston cylinder walls.
k) After the piston is all the way down, spray the walls with WD40.
l) Rotate the piston up again.
j) Vacuum again.
k) Slowly rotate the piston down, stopping a few times. Clean the walls and vacuum the piston cylinder area.
Doing the above gets most/all of the stuff off the piston. There's very little chance of ring damage.
The above, or similar, gets done hundreds of times each week by people that race their cars.
I've done the above a number of times. I've never had any problems. And, my other car is also my daily summer driver and has plenty of miles on it.
Be wary of people that say "do xyz - my car has been fine for years". You care more about the miles and the type of miles, verses a car that gets driving 150 miles a year and only on a few weekends.
#7
Super Member
Imho, a compression test should be just as good. The problem with a leak-down test is that the valves must be completely shut and tight on the cylinder. That can be a huge hassle, depending on how easy it is to get a ratchet on the harmonic balancer bolt. Also, a compressor with a good enough CFM volume is needed.
I've done plenty of leak-down tests. Imho, I go to a leak-down test if a compression test and a coolant exhaust gas test don't show anything "definitive" - but there is still a problem.
Also, leak-down tests can be affected by whether the engine is cold, warm, or hot. And, doing a leak-down test on a hot engine is often not fun.
Fwiw, from my own personal experience, *I* have seen most of my cold engine leak-down tests to be between worthless to kinda close.
From: https://mechanics.stackexchange.com/...-a-cold-engine
So searching the Internet, I've found some conflicting opinions, with an occasional person saying either that cold leak down tests are completely invalid, or that cold numbers will be two to three times warm numbers.
Fwiw, imho, a compression test (dry and wet) should've been done before the heads were removed. And the results should have been saved/recorded.
I've done plenty of leak-down tests. Imho, I go to a leak-down test if a compression test and a coolant exhaust gas test don't show anything "definitive" - but there is still a problem.
Also, leak-down tests can be affected by whether the engine is cold, warm, or hot. And, doing a leak-down test on a hot engine is often not fun.
Fwiw, from my own personal experience, *I* have seen most of my cold engine leak-down tests to be between worthless to kinda close.
From: https://mechanics.stackexchange.com/...-a-cold-engine
So searching the Internet, I've found some conflicting opinions, with an occasional person saying either that cold leak down tests are completely invalid, or that cold numbers will be two to three times warm numbers.
Fwiw, imho, a compression test (dry and wet) should've been done before the heads were removed. And the results should have been saved/recorded.
Last edited by RedGray; 09-05-2016 at 06:49 PM.