C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Red Tiger

2 questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
PC Valkyrie's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 1
From: Canada
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
2 questions

Hi all. First time posting here. I drive a 2002 C240 Classic (Canadian base model) with the 5 speed auto.

I recently upgraded to 225/45 17 inch tires and rims from my stock size of 205/55 16 inch. I have noticed that my fuel efficiency has decreased slightly (according to my trip computer), especially on the highway, usually cruising anywhere between 100-120km/h. I have the tire pressures set to the factory recomended levels (32psi in the rear, 28 in the front). This is what the dealer recommended as well with the new tires/rims. The tires I have are Falken Ziex ZE512.

So my first question is this: has anyone noticed a change in their fuel efficiency when changing to wider tires and larger rims? My brother said that was possible given potentially higher rolling resistance of these wider performance tires compared to the stock Continentals.

My second question relates to anyone on this board who has experience with the Kleeman Super charger upgrade for the C240. Has anyone tried this? Any problems with future servicing or maintenance performed by the dealer? I posted this particular question on other forums, but I have heard close to nothing about it, other than the fact that the Mercedes warranty will almost certainly be voided.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
vadim's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 3
From: Ashburn, VA
'19 GLC 300, '19 TM3SR+
From my experience, 32/28 is a bit on a low side. I use 36/32, and if feels perfect. Better control, and definitely better rim protection, especially now - until they repair all these fresh potholes.

Last edited by vadim; Apr 13, 2004 at 03:08 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #3  
Harris's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 1
Your new wheels are bigger and heavier, which means the car will need a bit more power to run them. So it is normal for the fuel efficiency to go down a bit.

I dont think a lot of people have installed the Kleemann supercharger upgrade on a C240, because with the price that you're paying, you can buy a C320 (or almost a 32).
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
888c240's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
I changed mine from stock to 225 40/18 and the psi is 44. Check from the tire side wall, it should says ##psi.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #5  
amdeutsch's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,759
Likes: 36
From: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally posted by 888c240
I changed mine from stock to 225 40/18 and the psi is 44. Check from the tire side wall, it should says ##psi.
That is not the psi that you're supposed to inflate your tires to automatically. Do it and you'll wear out your center, decrease tire life and handling.

Follow the MB recommendations and adjust from there based on you load and driving habits. Check on the tire forum. I believe Luke from the tirerack made a statement regarding this.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
vadim's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 3
From: Ashburn, VA
'19 GLC 300, '19 TM3SR+
Originally posted by 888c240
I changed mine from stock to 225 40/18 and the psi is 44. Check from the tire side wall, it should says ##psi.
Tuat's more likely the max pressure the tire can handle. 44 PSI certainly it too much for a street use.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
pokerFACE's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
i have 30 front 32 rear on stock 16s...

i'm already finding that the car understeers a lot more than at 28 front.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2004 | 07:36 PM
  #8  
CitronC230K_03's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, Ca
2003 Citron Green C230KMT
from the Mercedes-Benz website:

Z-rated tires are optimized for performance driving and may provide reduced ride comfort, increased tire noise, substantially increased treadwear and greater susceptibility to damage compared with H-rated tires.

Would this also apply to fuel consumption?
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.