MB mileage computer not accurate
#1
MB mileage computer not accurate
I have a habit of writing down the actual mileage on the odometer everytime I fill up the gas. From that, I can always caclulate the gas mileage based on the actual distance traveled and the amount of gas used. At the same time, I also reset the all trip computer counters.
What I find is that the gas mileage calcuated by the computer (the "mpg since last reset counter" ) is consistently higher than my calcuation by 2-3 mpg. Whenever it reports 25.3mpg, the actual number from my calcuation is 23.1, and when it says 23.4, the actual number is 21, etc.
Is that my gas mileage computer being overly optimistic (some time it'll read 35mpg, yeah right) or all C class are like that? Any thoughts?
What I find is that the gas mileage calcuated by the computer (the "mpg since last reset counter" ) is consistently higher than my calcuation by 2-3 mpg. Whenever it reports 25.3mpg, the actual number from my calcuation is 23.1, and when it says 23.4, the actual number is 21, etc.
Is that my gas mileage computer being overly optimistic (some time it'll read 35mpg, yeah right) or all C class are like that? Any thoughts?
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
I was pretty **** for the first 3 - 6 months of writing down the gallons per fill up and the mileage covered during each fill-up, and it was maybe of a dozen times by no more than 1 or 2 mpg's. I was satisfied, and figured there was a fudge factor, like going down-hill will add mpg's if you let go of the gas, and taking it easy going up-hill. So I quit worrying about it. As far as average, the ballpark seems about the same from everyone raging from 17 to 27 mpg.
_________________
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
_________________
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
#7
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'14 GLK250 Diesel
ALL of the cars I've owned with engine management computers and dashboard readouts have consistently recorded lower fuel consumption [higher mpg] than real-world calculations from actual miles divided by actual fuel put in the tank. ALL. This includes MB, BMW, Acura and others.
Part of this is that topping up at the pump always causes inconsistencies that will make the logbook look slightly more pessimistic; the less I put in after the pump shuts off, the closer I get to the computer's number. Still, this pattern is consistent enough over a long enough period of time that I'm ready to say it just seems to go with the territory.
I always record the manual calculation in my log, not the computer's. Over the very long haul, I'd say the difference is on the order of 1.0-1.2 mpg, with the computer always on the optimistic side.
Part of this is that topping up at the pump always causes inconsistencies that will make the logbook look slightly more pessimistic; the less I put in after the pump shuts off, the closer I get to the computer's number. Still, this pattern is consistent enough over a long enough period of time that I'm ready to say it just seems to go with the territory.
I always record the manual calculation in my log, not the computer's. Over the very long haul, I'd say the difference is on the order of 1.0-1.2 mpg, with the computer always on the optimistic side.
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 97 Likes
on
52 Posts
2015 E250D
you can adjust this factor in the DAS system at the dealer under "INSTRUMENT CLUSTER" settings. You can make the necessary changes to make the readings more accurate based on real world figures.
#11
Administrator
Originally Posted by sunman
you can adjust this factor in the DAS system at the dealer under "INSTRUMENT CLUSTER" settings. You can make the necessary changes to make the readings more accurate based on real world figures.
#12
Originally Posted by sunman
you can adjust this factor in the DAS system at the dealer under "INSTRUMENT CLUSTER" settings. You can make the necessary changes to make the readings more accurate based on real world figures.
Do I have to ask the dealer to do that? How would they know which way to adjust?
#15
Super Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
My MPG computer has been right on. It has been off, at most by less than 1 MPG, usually by less than 0.4 MPG and frequenty 0.0 MPG.
At each fill I reset the computer, so the numbers recalculate to the next fill.
There are two sets of numbers. I use the MPG since last resetm not since last start.
At each fill I reset the computer, so the numbers recalculate to the next fill.
There are two sets of numbers. I use the MPG since last resetm not since last start.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX. 78738
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
c230 kompressor
Ok you bought the car, your going to put gas in the car to make the car run. Who the **** cares how many mpg you are getting because you are going to put gas in the car anyways!
#19
Super Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
Originally Posted by HITMAN
ive gotten as low as 13 mpg and as high as 31
Originally Posted by HITMAN
Who the **** cares how many mpg you are getting because you are going to put gas in the car anyways!
#20
Originally Posted by HITMAN
Ok you bought the car, your going to put gas in the car to make the car run. Who the **** cares how many mpg you are getting because you are going to put gas in the car anyways!
Other reasons to care about the mpg calculation is to compare across cars, we have mulitple cars in the family, and gas consumption could be a factor in deciding which car to take on long trips.
I also interested to know if different gasoline brands make a difference in gas mileage....etc.
They wouldn't put the on-board computer there if MB doesn't think it's somewhat useful to have these stats.