c7 shifter vs. stock shifter
As I get closer to filing my lemon law suit, I've really thought about getting a standard tranny despite the fact I live on the steepest hill in San Francisco. I just miss driving a stick so much and decided that the headache parking is a fair trade-off for a stick.
When I bought my car, I test drove the stock shifter and was unimpressed. I know everyone sezz it gets better, but I just did not like it enough. So my question is how much better is the C7 shifter? Could someone please describe the differences.
(btw, Lynn, I would have PMed your directly, but I thought others would like to know this too.
)Cheers,
Beth
weekday you can drive mine a bit. I work on Oyster Point
Blvd. 2K miles on it right now, definitely feels better
than when I picked it up but I'm hoping it breaks in a
little more still. Don't remember how the non-C7 feels
so I can't compare.
We'll see what others have to say. Heard you got some rain. Are the flows up?
Cheers,
Beth
I've really thought about getting a standard tranny despite the fact I live on the steepest hill in San Francisco. I just miss driving a stick so much and decided that the headache parking is a fair trade-off for a stick.
If you have to parallel park a lot in the hilly terrain, I just want to point out the floor e-brake is a pain in the @$$ to use in these conditions.
BT
Beth
If you have to parallel park a lot in the hilly terrain, I just want to point out the floor e-brake is a pain in the @$$ to use in these conditions.
BT
So, the floor e-brake is a pain, but it is still doable right? It's not like I need a third foot?
thx
Beth
So, the floor e-brake is a pain, but it is still doable right? It's not like I need a third foot?
Of course, if you had a third foot it would be no problem at all.
BT
Trending Topics
If you want to make your way down to South SF during the
weekday you can drive mine a bit. I work on Oyster Point
Blvd. 2K miles on it right now, definitely feels better
than when I picked it up but I'm hoping it breaks in a
little more still. Don't remember how the non-C7 feels
so I can't compare.
Beth
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I just went to the garage and rowed the shifter of my now dead 280z. I really liked the way that car shifted, even if I did go through three used trannies in the 7 1/2 years I drove it. The C7 has shorter thows and a narrow gate. The MB trans is stiffer, but then it only has 3900 miles while the Datsun has who knows how many.
While St. Louis isn't as hilly as SF, it isn't exactly flat, especially where I live. One route I take often almost always requires stopping on a semi-steep slope. The car has no problem starting from a stop and going up the hill.
This brings up little side issue and question.
I was taught to drive a standard on hills steeper than most in SF in an International Scout with the under the dash engage and disengage by hand parking brake. The insructor taught me how to use disengage parking brake, engage the clutch and gentley press the throttle to start from a dead stop. I told him this seems silly, can't I just keep my right foot on the brake, and when the time comes release the brake, move my foot to the throttle, and engage the clutch. He told me to try it. I rolled back about three feet the first time. That was the last time in 36 years I have ever rolled back more than a few inches. My question is this. Do people really use the parking brake to start from a dead stop on a hill? The whole idea boggles my mind!
Edit: I wrote the above after reading Beths's original post, and with out reading the rest. I can see how the parking brake might be useful when parallel parking a very steep hill.
Last edited by Lynn; May 16, 2002 at 08:15 PM.
It's doable - but awkward. On an especially steep hill it might be very difficult - I had a little trouble on the steep part of Powell near the top of *** Hill once keeping the car from rolling backward too much while trying to work the brake, clutch and gas all at once.
Of course, if you had a third foot it would be no problem at all.
BT
thanks for your help!
Beth
The insructor taught me how to use disengage parking brake, engage the clutch and gentley press the throttle to start from a dead stop. I told him this seems silly, can't I just keep my right foot on the brake, and when the time comes release the brake, move my foot to the throttle, and engage the clutch. He told me to try it. I rolled back about three feet the first time. That was the last time in 36 years I have ever rolled back more than a few inches. My question is this. Do people really use the parking brake to start from a dead stop on a hill? The whole idea boggles my mind!
Edit: I wrote the above after reading Beths's original post, and with out reading the rest. I can see how the parking brake might be useful when parallel parking a very steep hill.
Funny, but the car I drove prior to the Merc was the first one I ever had with a hand-brake, and before it I never had any problems - but believe me, you can get addicted to the hand brake in a big hurry. As Yoda would say - Unlearn bad habits you must.
:p
BT
Thanks! I knew you would have an idea about this one. Your memory must be pretty good to remember the other car I looked at was the RSX (which shifted so well, I just did not like the rest of the car).
Well, it good to know that the C7 package shifts better. I really miss drving a stick.
Yes, Lynn, you need to use the e-brake to park near my house. I see people get in so much trouble all the time because they don't know that trick. And you can smell them blowing their clutch. The slope on the hill outside my house is 31 degrees.
Thanks
Beth
Last edited by galaxygrrl; May 16, 2002 at 08:33 PM.
So it seems it's the luck of the draw to some extent.
Bos wrote a while back that the shifters of both types are adjustable, so maybe therein lies the apparent inconsistency between opinions.
Thanks Rick, I'm hoping to avoid going to test drive it, but your post makes me think I should. To be honest, I really just want the door handles especially if I don't get black. I really do not like the c7 wheels (no one shoot me please).
Let me point out, if the dealer would sell me a car that worked, I would not have this problem. And for the record, I've never asked a dealer for a new car. Please lay blame where it belongs before aiming both your barrels at me.
Cheers,
Beth
Last edited by galaxygrrl; May 16, 2002 at 09:25 PM.
make sure you drive the one you are going to buy extensively, to make sure you are happy with the way it shifts.
Thanks though
Beth
if the C7 really have a shorter throw shifter wouldn't MB had noted in their website and on the 2002 catalog?
i found this on the MB web as the detail of what is the C7 package:
-
2002 Options
C7: Wheel Package
Four 17" 7-spoke alloy wheels with 225/45 ZR17 high-performance tires. Color-keyed exterior door handles. Enlarged, polished stainless steel exhaust tip. 3-spoke sport steering wheel with raised thumbgrips. Leather-covered sport shift knob. Rubber-studded aluminum pedals. Patterned aluminum door sill applique's.
-
they only say that the shift knob is covered with leather nothing more.
this is the picture that goes with the text:
The shifters have a different part #. Bos actually changed his out for a C7 part # shifter, and it is indeed different. He posted pictures. If you do a search, you can find the thread. I was quite pissed when I found out there were actually mechanical differences since my sales person said it was all cosmetic.
maybe MB do that to give the C7 pkg a shorter feel. don't really know.
the best way is that someone email MBUSA and find out...
There is no mention of this in any of the promotions I have seen.
Here in Canada they don't call it C7, it called the Evolution package and comes with floor mats embroidered with Evolution.
See ya, Smoky
i don't think there is mechanical difference after examim the picture the only difference from what i can see if the connecting rod. one is bend and one is straight.
maybe MB do that to give the C7 pkg a shorter feel. don't really know.
the best way is that someone email MBUSA and find out...
Go here for more pics etc.






