C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

non-ceramic tint and navi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:31 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
piccirm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 Artic white, MM, PII, 18 AMG, Ipod
Question non-ceramic tint and navi

Will a metallic, non-ceramic tint interfere with the navi, xirius?. Please advise as dealership is suggesting ceramic due to the above.
Thanks
Old 09-23-2008, 12:31 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ron Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C300 Sport Black Darth V3.0
No it won't the antenna is on the roof.
Old 09-23-2008, 12:34 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AkaSigFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 3,056
Received 46 Likes on 41 Posts
E350 Sport/ML350RWD
Not with OEM installed systems. The interference is usually with handhelds or standalone units like my Garmin. I do think ceramic tint has a "cleaner" look though. My tint was perfectly clear the day it was tinted.
Old 09-23-2008, 12:44 PM
  #4  
Member
 
maverickvii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6M
I have non-ceramic and nothing has been affected at all (although I can't say I've ever even tried to use AM radio)
Old 09-23-2008, 12:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
tpick23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 353
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63
Llumar ATR series

works well for me. No problem with the navigation or the TPMS units and the garage openers work great too.
Old 09-23-2008, 01:59 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
piccirm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 Artic white, MM, PII, 18 AMG, Ipod
Thaks for this info. i'm trying to decide as there is a big difference in price
Old 09-23-2008, 02:57 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
white46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 373
Received 32 Likes on 22 Posts
08 C300
dealer wants your money, that's why they are BSing with ceramic / non-ceramic tint.
there is no difference between two as far as radio, cell, navi reception.
Old 09-23-2008, 04:01 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ron Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C300 Sport Black Darth V3.0
Go to a tinter that is not associated with the AD but who has a good rep. Most likely cost you half what the dealer wants. My dealer qouted me $500.00 USD I got it done for 200.00 by an independent shop.
Old 09-23-2008, 06:26 PM
  #9  
Member
 
drevil2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: GTA North
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 BMW 335xi titanium silver.
I had ceramic tint (35%) - and did not interfere with nav (OEM or windshield mounted), garage door opener or radio. I had the GPS antenna installed against the fusebox and it was fine. Some toll highway transponders might not work, but most people don't tint the front windshield however.

The nature of the ceramic non metallic tint should not conduct or interfere with electronics.

Went to the same place the dealer gets it done and got a good discount. After tinting my last car, it's hard not to tint the new one.
Old 09-23-2008, 07:30 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Azn_C300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes C300 Sport, BMW 745Li, VW Mk6 Golf TDI
Just get metallic. You won't notice any interference. Ceramic tint falls in the same category of Nitrogen fill tires.....I'm sure there's a mathematical measurable, but not enough to notice in real world.
Old 09-23-2008, 09:44 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
piccirm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 Artic white, MM, PII, 18 AMG, Ipod
Thanks again guys.
i think I'll go with the non-ceramic. With money saved I may use for other mods.
Thanks AZN, you are in the tinting business right?. I'll then take your authorized word for it.
Regards
Old 09-23-2008, 10:43 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
peet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,249
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
09 C63
1) ceramic will do better at heat rejection. 2) ceramic will withstand time better and not discolor. 3) ceramic is typically a thicker substrate and will act as a better shatter resistant material. 4) people have had issues with FM and AM signal with non-ceramic films... those antennae are NOT on the roof and are on the rear window. 5) you MAY have issues with GPS antenna as that is inside the dashboard, not on the roof.

So if it's a couple of bucks - spring for it. Probably worth it in the long haul. I unfortunately live in a 50-50 cliamate (hot/cold) so we don't have many ceramic shops. But you coming from NC, you see your share of heat - may well be worth it just for the heat rejection.

Lastly - IF ANY reason... you like using radar detectors? Yep - metallic (non-ceramic) films block that signal. That alone is reason to go ceramic.
Old 09-23-2008, 11:32 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Azn_C300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes C300 Sport, BMW 745Li, VW Mk6 Golf TDI
1) ceramic will do better at heat rejection.

Maybe by a few degrees, but like I said, if it's hot, it's hot...100 degrees and 102 degrees in the car feels the same. If you're sensitive enough to be able to tell the difference in 3-4 degrees, then yeah, go for it.

2) ceramic will withstand time better and not discolor.

This totally depends on the quality of film. High quality metallic film can last 15 years.

3) ceramic is typically a thicker substrate and will act as a better shatter resistant material.

Your vehicle windows already have shatter resistant material on it....this is the wearing two condoms argument..

4) people have had issues with FM and AM signal with non-ceramic films... those antennae are NOT on the roof and are on the rear window.

Unless you live in the middle of nowhere and listen to stations that are already weak signal, I highly doubt you'll notice any difference. If you do like to listen to stations that area already weak signals prior to tinting, then ok, an argument can be made here.

5) you MAY have issues with GPS antenna as that is inside the dashboard, not on the roof.

different type of signal.
Old 09-24-2008, 09:54 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
piccirm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 Artic white, MM, PII, 18 AMG, Ipod
difference between ceramic vs non-ceramic is around $150. I could use that for the roof spoiler.

Thanks again for the useful info

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: non-ceramic tint and navi



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.