C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

1/4 mile slips stock vs 1/4 mile slips tuned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-28-2013, 01:33 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
cigarnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 300 sport
1/4 mile slips stock vs 1/4 mile slips tuned

So I have been searching around, the tune for our c300 gets approx 20 hp and 15 lb of torque (or whatever the numbers are.)

The truth of the matter is numbers are fine and cool to brag about,(or in this case to be ashamed about) but what do these numbers actually result to?

I don't know if it's just me but I could care less if a dyno says X amount of horsepower and X amount of torque. Ultimately if the tune gains 1/2 a second or something very significant in the 1/4 mile times then its worth it!

Has anyone actually tracked their c300 4matic stock versus after a tune or after a tune and exhaust system?

thanks!
Old 08-28-2013, 03:21 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Sma2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2016 C450 (no code 165 option..)
No but my A** tells me it is faster. Is enough for me
Old 08-28-2013, 03:32 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,601
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6 Speed Manual, 1953 Chevy Bel-Air, 2015 Audi allroad, 1963 Chevy Apache
Originally Posted by Sma2c
No but my A** tells me it is faster. Is enough for me
Same here...my seat-o-the-pants timer says my car is a couple tenths quicker to 60....
If I ever do go to a track, I will take my tuner and run a couple tuned vs. stock laps to verify.
Old 08-28-2013, 03:40 PM
  #4  
Member
 
joespeed29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: BOS
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 C300 Sport
youre better off going to a track, and not drag racing the car
Old 08-28-2013, 03:58 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
cigarnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 300 sport
Originally Posted by joespeed29
youre better off going to a track, and not drag racing the car
I completely agree, I do not enjoy drag racing any longer as it has become boring to me.

However, my question was to try and get some concrete evidence of improved times in the 1/4 mile with a tune. Better yet what does 60' look like stock versus tuned. (not 0-60, 60')

no one has any evidence of this?? Everyone that gets a tune done just relies that it "feels" faster.
Old 08-28-2013, 08:33 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
victort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2010 C300
tune or not, it's still a relatively slow car. at least compared to today's standards
Old 08-28-2013, 09:24 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Sma2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2016 C450 (no code 165 option..)
It is not relies on, it IS faster. C'mon, you can tell if a car is faster or not. You are right that the HP number really does not matter. Neither does the 0-60 or qtr mile. It matters how the car drives and performs in the real world.
Kleeman offers to run your car on their dyno before and after. Head on over to Colorado Springs, COand git r dun
I would say stick with what you have and eliminate the possibility of being disappointed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 1/4 mile slips stock vs 1/4 mile slips tuned



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.