C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

Why doesn't my rear rotors have holes in it like my front rotors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-31-2013, 10:19 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
kph2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 c300
Why doesn't my rear rotors have holes in it like my front rotors?

I have a 2008 c300 6 speed manual sport and i just noticed that my rear rotors have no holes. But the front do. I think that would explain why my rear wheels are constantly dirty with brake dust and my front wheels are not. Im just curious to know why the rear rotors are designed like this?
Old 08-31-2013, 10:36 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,601
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6 Speed Manual, 1953 Chevy Bel-Air, 2015 Audi allroad, 1963 Chevy Apache
Drilled rotors are supposed to cool down faster though I have my doubts of how well the small holes in our rotors work to improve things. The fronts take most of the braking load so they are bigger and drilled.
The rears tend to get dirtier due to EBP(electronic brake proportioning) which brakes the rears more that the fronts in straight line stops. MB has a bulletin out for rear pad replacement on 2008 modesl as the original stock pads throw off more dust than was deemed acceptable.
Old 08-31-2013, 10:43 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Eltee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 C450 AMG, 2011 BMW Z4 35i, 2009 Cadillac STS, 2011 Infiniti QX56
On many applications the front rotors are drilled (holes in them) and the rears not because the fronts are taking the brunt of the punishment when braking hard. The holes help dissipate heat to avoid brake fade. Not sure if the holes help keep dust off but it is possible.

The main reason your rears have more dust is because MB applies more braking power to the rear brakes during normal braking. They do this to make stopping less " nose down" and therefore more "comfortable". Other companies tend to apply more pressure to the fronts no matter how hard the braking is. MB does apply more pressure to the fronts during hard braking and that's probably why they drill them.
Old 08-31-2013, 10:49 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Eltee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 C450 AMG, 2011 BMW Z4 35i, 2009 Cadillac STS, 2011 Infiniti QX56
Regarding the bulletin on 2008 pads. I have a 2008 also. Have about 65K miles. Still have about 50% (according to Midas) on the original rear pads and yes they do dust more than I would think is normal.

Any ideas when that bulletin came out and chances of getting them replaced?
Old 08-31-2013, 11:09 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
TexFinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Argyle, TX
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
10 Tahoe LT, 07 Silverado Z71, 99 BMW R1100RT
Originally Posted by Eltee
Any ideas when that bulletin came out and chances of getting them replaced?
As in chances getting them replaced for free? Unless you find a REALLY accomodating dealer, I'd say pretty much zero.
Old 08-31-2013, 11:10 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AkaSigFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 3,056
Received 46 Likes on 41 Posts
E350 Sport/ML350RWD
The bulletin was back in 2009 and was limited to cars with less than 12,000 miles.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Why doesn't my rear rotors have holes in it like my front rotors?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.