C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

C200/250CGI tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-02-2014, 05:07 PM
  #51  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Of course there are things we can do. My argument is that, without changing at least the pistons, and with little flexibility on the tune, we are only ever going to get incremental increases. Increasing efficiency by such things as port and polishing is a good tactic but it isn't going to do much.

You are right, sky is the limit if you have the money, but by the time we spend enough to realise significant gains, well, we could just trade in for a 300 or better.
Old 09-02-2014, 09:55 PM
  #52  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Knightmare69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2010 C200 CGI
Very true in a points, none of which I'd argue. I think another member is waiting for Eurocharged to confirm they can flash our Siemens ecu, depending on how that goes I may alter my future goals with this car. For now I've managed to get my hands on a massive OEM fmic which I'm hoping will fit without too much hassle.
Old 09-02-2014, 10:10 PM
  #53  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
Very true in a points, none of which I'd argue. I think another member is waiting for Eurocharged to confirm they can flash our Siemens ecu, depending on how that goes I may alter my future goals with this car. For now I've managed to get my hands on a massive OEM fmic which I'm hoping will fit without too much hassle.
Hey,

So I just got word form one of my Benz contacts. The Pistons, Cams and compression ratio are different between the models, as well as the turbo.

He is going to get back to me about specifics, but they definitely run lower compression in the 250's with higher boost pressure.

So basically, short of a substantial rebuild, we are not going to get the same performance out of a 200.

I will get back to you when/if I get my hands on specific details
Old 09-02-2014, 11:31 PM
  #54  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Knightmare69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2010 C200 CGI
Originally Posted by AusMB87
Hey,

So I just got word form one of my Benz contacts. The Pistons, Cams and compression ratio are different between the models, as well as the turbo.

He is going to get back to me about specifics, but they definitely run lower compression in the 250's with higher boost pressure.

So basically, short of a substantial rebuild, we are not going to get the same performance out of a 200.

I will get back to you when/if I get my hands on specific details
Awesome, thanks for the update. Unfortunately our cars aren't as simple to mod as say Japanese cars so I'm not sure how feasible it'll be to run 250 cams in the 200 especially since we'd probably have to reprogram the ecu for it right?

Wait, how come Edmund's information says it's the same compression as c180/200?

http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/c-class/2012/road-test-specs1.html

Last edited by Knightmare69; 09-02-2014 at 11:33 PM.
Old 09-03-2014, 12:26 AM
  #55  
Member
 
EvolutionDrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C250
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
Very true in a points, none of which I'd argue. I think another member is waiting for Eurocharged to confirm they can flash our Siemens ecu, depending on how that goes I may alter my future goals with this car. For now I've managed to get my hands on a massive OEM fmic which I'm hoping will fit without too much hassle.
Yeah that member is me lol
Old 09-03-2014, 12:34 AM
  #56  
Member
 
EvolutionDrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C250
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
Awesome, thanks for the update. Unfortunately our cars aren't as simple to mod as say Japanese cars so I'm not sure how feasible it'll be to run 250 cams in the 200 especially since we'd probably have to reprogram the ecu for it right?

Wait, how come Edmund's information says it's the same compression as c180/200?

http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/c-class/2012/road-test-specs1.html
When doing research several websites listed compression ratio as 9:3:1 across all the platforms. But there was one that listed c180/c200 compression ratio as 9:8:1 and c250 as 9:3:1. Also from reading other mercedes benz forums some members said that the bottom end block was exactly the same across all platforms. The difference was in the head and the turbo.
Old 09-03-2014, 12:51 AM
  #57  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
I'm not sure how feasible it'll be to run 250 cams in the 200 especially since we'd probably have to reprogram the ecu for it right?

Wait, how come Edmund's information says it's the same compression as c180/200?
I would say it is not feasible at all to swap out cams and pistons etc. Parts alone would be so expensive, you may as well put your C200 back to standard, trade it in on a used 250, pay the extra couple of grand and throw all your mods on the new one.

The C180 is 10.3 (with the 1.6 M271)

I seriously doubt the edmund's, or any other vehicle reviewer, have actually measured the compression ratio in each vehicle. They usually go off of dealer released info. As we all know, Benz is pretty tight lipped about that. Take those figures with a grain of salt...

I am one hundred percent sure that the part numbers differ. Given that the turbo and cam part numbers also differ, it makes sense that the ratio would be different. From a mechanic's perspective, the best way to get more power from an engine with identical bottom ends is to either lower compression and increase boost (cam change required to optimise) or bore it out. They have the same volume (1796cc) so it hasn't been bored.

We will just have to wait and see what comes back form my sources

Last edited by AusMB87; 09-03-2014 at 12:54 AM.
Old 09-03-2014, 12:53 AM
  #58  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Originally Posted by EvolutionDrock
When doing research several websites listed compression ratio as 9:3:1 across all the platforms. But there was one that listed c180/c200 compression ratio as 9:8:1 and c250 as 9:3:1. Also from reading other mercedes benz forums some members said that the bottom end block was exactly the same across all platforms. The difference was in the head and the turbo.
I am pretty sure those 9.8 and 9.3 ratios will be on the money.

The bottom end is almost identical. conrods, block and crank are the same. Pistons aren't
Old 09-04-2014, 05:43 AM
  #59  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Knightmare69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2010 C200 CGI
Originally Posted by EvolutionDrock
Yeah that member is me lol
Sorry, I'm in a haze from multiple forums trying to find answers. So did they get back to you about this matter?
Old 09-13-2014, 12:46 AM
  #60  
Newbie
 
Toxicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 SLK200
Just an update guys, just installed the Unichip and got it tuned by one of the local tuners here. Some cutting and splicing required. Pretty decent results overall. The good thing about the unichip is that it allows for adjustments based on the RPM of the engine. Bad thing is as Knightmare mentioned, this seems to be the limit of what we can do with the stock configuration.

Tuning was done on a dyno (dynojet).

Overall results were -
Before(With Rado IC and DP): 175PS, 278Nm
After (With Rado IC, DP, and Unichip): 195PS, 306Nm

Keep in mind these are taken at the wheel and not on the crank / flywheel. I can post the dyno sheet if anyone is interested. Looking forward to more updates from you guys as well!
Old 09-13-2014, 01:02 AM
  #61  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
I would love to see the dyno sheet! Not bad results - too bad we don't have stock figures at the wheels :S
Old 09-13-2014, 02:43 AM
  #62  
Junior Member
 
IRIDIUMSILVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 57
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C300 Sport / C36 / C250 Sport
Gentleman..
why not just install a Rado down-pipe and jb piggybank and be done with it?
Old 09-13-2014, 03:09 AM
  #63  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Well, I'm not sure if the rado downpipe will fit my RHD car - the own from Armytrix doesn't.
As for the tune - there are many benefits to going with something from brabus, carlsson etc. Much more comprehensive units.

Above all, why do what's already been done? The figuring it out is more fun to me than bolting it on. The day I run out of mods is probably the day the car goes up for sale :-)
Old 09-13-2014, 03:21 AM
  #64  
Newbie
 
Toxicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 SLK200
AusMB, my car is RHD as well and the downpipe just about fits. the main problem is the o2 sensor. it is tight but it goes in. Please note though that mine is a SLK but it should be the same.
Old 09-13-2014, 03:31 AM
  #65  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AusMB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W204 MY10 C200CGI
Originally Posted by Toxicity
AusMB, my car is RHD as well and the downpipe just about fits. the main problem is the o2 sensor. it is tight but it goes in. Please note though that mine is a SLK but it should be the same.
Good to know. I'm waiting on word back from rado with a definitive. Mostly because the postage to Australia makes the part really expensive

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C200/250CGI tune



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.