Track Results 2012 CLS63 - 11.3's with a tune only on street tires
#26
Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
#28
Member
Thread Starter
If someone is only running 12's let alone 13's in a C6 ZO6 then they have absolutely horrible driving skills!
What's hard to believe? Those times on the ZO6 fast list? Those times are 100% real and criteria must be met before a time is included on that list. Check out the complete list here
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...fast-list.html
As far as my ZO6 here is my best time to date
My car will be running consistent 8's in the next few weeks as I'm installing a trans brake
#29
Member
Thread Starter
Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
#30
Super Member
If someone is only running 12's let alone 13's in a C6 ZO6 then they have absolutely horrible driving skills!
What's hard to believe? Those times on the ZO6 fast list? Those times are 100% real and criteria must be met before a time is included on that list. Check out the complete list here
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...fast-list.html
As far as my ZO6 here is my best time to date
My car will be running consistent 8's in the next few weeks as I'm installing a trans brake
What's hard to believe? Those times on the ZO6 fast list? Those times are 100% real and criteria must be met before a time is included on that list. Check out the complete list here
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...fast-list.html
As far as my ZO6 here is my best time to date
My car will be running consistent 8's in the next few weeks as I'm installing a trans brake
I just didn't think that a car as technologically unadvanced as the zo6 , as well as being a pretty old platform would be that fast. ie I figure a brand new cls63 or f10 m5 "should" be able to walk all over a crappy old zo6 .
no offense.
j just find them to be kindof " all brawn and no brains" type of car
#31
Member
Thread Starter
GM advertises 11.7 quarter mile times for the ZO6 and 11.3 for the ZR1.
Technologically unadvanced? Really? Perhaps you should do some more research on them. They are an extremely advanced driving machine and hold records at the Nurburgring beating out cars costing hundreds of thousands more
And in case you're curious, here are the bone stock on stock tire times from the ZR1 fast list. If you click "video" it will bring to to the videos of these cars running the crazy times
==================
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.664 132.92 1.68 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
2~~~~ 10.740 133.21 1.74 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 10.794 132.21 1.80 jamie furman ~ 2009 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 10.851 129.89 1.70 racerns ~~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
5~~~~ 10.950 131.61 1.83 VY ZR1 ~~~~~ 2009 details
6~~~~ 11.071 129.87 1.87 SlowZo6 ~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
7~~~~ 11.235 125.99 1.99 Incon306~~~~ 2010 details
The complete ZR1 fast list is here
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...fast-list.html
Last edited by Ready2roll; 01-22-2012 at 08:39 PM.
#32
Super Member
and that time of 9 seconds was obviously on a very modified zo6 right?
what did you say like 1000 hp?
I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63.
and 11.3 is still pretty kick *** for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
what did you say like 1000 hp?
I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63.
and 11.3 is still pretty kick *** for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
#33
Member
Thread Starter
I'm not comparing them. You asked me what my car ran so I showed you. There is no comparison
and 11.3 is still pretty kick *** for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
Yes, the tune just unleashes the car's potential
#34
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C2S CAB & C6Z06 & CLS63
and that time of 9 seconds was obviously on a very modified zo6 right?
what did you say like 1000 hp?
I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63.
and 11.3 is still pretty kick *** for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
what did you say like 1000 hp?
I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63.
and 11.3 is still pretty kick *** for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
#36
Super Member
You must drive a Z06 to appreciate the insane performance and capabilities, even a stock model. My car has about 100RWHP over stock and it makes the CLS 63 seem slow when taking off from 60MPH. Maxing out 3rd and 4th gear on the Z06 is quite scary, it's just brutal performance for a N/A street car. Hopefully a tune on the CLS63 will fix things up a bit.
do you have the P.P cls63?
2012?
#38
Super Member
yeah i have seen a few z06's on youtube, thats the only place ive seen them... i havent spent much time researching them though, as i dont care for them really. since ive owned a german car, pretty much all american cars just come across as a joke to me. especially in the looks dept.
and your z06 makes a cls63 with performance package seem SLOW?
and your z06 makes a cls63 with performance package seem SLOW?
#39
Member
Thread Starter
I'm 100% sure. I've never heard of Techtec?
Check out the V-Tech tunes here
http://www.4-tecperformance.com/inde...&cPath=180_191
Check out the V-Tech tunes here
http://www.4-tecperformance.com/inde...&cPath=180_191
#40
Member
Thread Starter
A Z06 with 100 more RWHP than stock will make a CLS63, even a tuned CLS63 seem slow!!!!
Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke
Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick
Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke
Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick
#41
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
A Z06 with 100 more RWHP than stock will make a CLS63, even a tuned CLS63 seem slow!!!!
Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke
Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick
Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke
Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick
I know the Z06 is a great car. But the driver factor plays a larger role than it does in ours. Personally Id get one but Im so damn lazy and tired of rowing. My last car with a manny was my 996TT.
#42
Member
Thread Starter
I agree 100%. Most people that buy them are clueless on how to drive one properly. I also got tired of rowing gears and converted mine over to an auto
#43
Super Member
yeah their like 1100 lbs lighter. thats a lot.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any.
#45
Member
Thread Starter
They come with LSD, traction control and also something called active handling. Despite the fact that it's built by Chevrolet, it's a very advanced performance machine
#46
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C2S CAB & C6Z06 & CLS63
Even with traction control it's very easy to get it sideways. The car is no way built like a German car but if your just looking for a fun/affordable muscle car, this is it.
#47
Member
Thread Starter
Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html
Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel?
#48
Member
Ready, do you have factory LSD option or aftermarket? Is stock one at only 30% locking really worth it and help any with off the line starts?
#49
Member
Thread Starter
I have the factory LSD which is 40% locking. It's definitely working. No wheel spin off the line launching just off idle. As you can tell by the time slips it's working very well for me
#50
Member