Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel? |
Very nice numbers!!
|
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5015582)
strange, yet all the vids of corvettes (that appear stock) I've seen on YouTube they always seem to run like mid 12's - mid 13's.
If someone is only running 12's let alone 13's in a C6 ZO6 then they have absolutely horrible driving skills!
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5015922)
this is hard to believe. what about your Z06 now?
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...fast-list.html As far as my ZO6 here is my best time to date https://i130.photobucket.com/albums/...ddis68/908.jpg My car will be running consistent 8's in the next few weeks as I'm installing a trans brake :y |
Originally Posted by Marc
(Post 5016521)
Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel? |
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
(Post 5016962)
If someone is only running 12's let alone 13's in a C6 ZO6 then they have absolutely horrible driving skills!
What's hard to believe? Those times on the ZO6 fast list? Those times are 100% real and criteria must be met before a time is included on that list. Check out the complete list here http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...fast-list.html As far as my ZO6 here is my best time to date https://i130.photobucket.com/albums/...ddis68/908.jpg My car will be running consistent 8's in the next few weeks as I'm installing a trans brake :y I just didn't think that a car as technologically unadvanced as the zo6 , as well as being a pretty old platform would be that fast. ie I figure a brand new cls63 or f10 m5 "should" be able to walk all over a crappy old zo6 . no offense. j just find them to be kindof " all brawn and no brains" type of car |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017110)
it's just that the videos I've seen don't coincide with these crazy times . I thought the stock quoted time for a zo6 was around 12 flat. and even a zr1 was around 11.6. ???
GM advertises 11.7 quarter mile times for the ZO6 and 11.3 for the ZR1.
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017110)
I just didn't think that a car as technologically unadvanced as the zo6
And in case you're curious, here are the bone stock on stock tire times from the ZR1 fast list. If you click "video" it will bring to to the videos of these cars running the crazy times ;) ================== Bone-Stock on Stock Tires ================== Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video 1~~~~ 10.664 132.92 1.68 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video 2~~~~ 10.740 133.21 1.74 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video 3~~~~ 10.794 132.21 1.80 jamie furman ~ 2009 details~~ thread 4~~~~ 10.851 129.89 1.70 racerns ~~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video 5~~~~ 10.950 131.61 1.83 VY ZR1 ~~~~~ 2009 details 6~~~~ 11.071 129.87 1.87 SlowZo6 ~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video 7~~~~ 11.235 125.99 1.99 Incon306~~~~ 2010 details The complete ZR1 fast list is here http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...fast-list.html |
and that time of 9 seconds was obviously on a very modified zo6 right?
what did you say like 1000 hp? I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63. and 11.3 is still pretty kick ass for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ... |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017123)
and that time of 9 seconds was obviously on a very modified zo6 right?
what did you say like 1000 hp?
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017123)
I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63.
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017123)
and 11.3 is still pretty kick ass for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ...
Yes, the tune just unleashes the car's potential :y |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017123)
and that time of 9 seconds was obviously on a very modified zo6 right?
what did you say like 1000 hp? I don really expect to compare cars that heavily modded to a cls63. and 11.3 is still pretty kick ass for a basically stock car. that heavy. even though it has a tune, the way i lopk at it the car is essentually stock form, and the tune only releases the potential that's already in the car right ? no physical changes to the car . just basicly " turning up the volume" a bit ... |
V-tech tune? Are you sure? Or is it a TechTec tune?
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
(Post 5016964)
Yep, that V-tech tune is incredible. Those times are on 93 octane pump gas :y
|
Originally Posted by 805Benz
(Post 5017321)
You must drive a Z06 to appreciate the insane performance and capabilities, even a stock model. My car has about 100RWHP over stock and it makes the CLS 63 seem slow when taking off from 60MPH. Maxing out 3rd and 4th gear on the Z06 is quite scary, it's just brutal performance for a N/A street car. Hopefully a tune on the CLS63 will fix things up a bit.
do you have the P.P cls63? 2012? |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017363)
do you have the P.P cls63?
2012? |
Originally Posted by 805Benz
(Post 5017383)
Yup... Check out the z06 videos on YouTube...
and your z06 makes a cls63 with performance package seem SLOW? |
Originally Posted by Marc
(Post 5017324)
V-tech tune? Are you sure? Or is it a TechTec tune?
Check out the V-Tech tunes here http://www.4-tecperformance.com/inde...&cPath=180_191 |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5017405)
and your z06 makes a cls63 with performance package seem SLOW? Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke :naughty: Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick :rolf: |
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
(Post 5017629)
A Z06 with 100 more RWHP than stock will make a CLS63, even a tuned CLS63 seem slow!!!!
Your lack of knowledge about the Z has obviously given you the wrong impression about this American made super car. A car with that much power, aluminum frame, carbon fiber body parts and weighs in at a mere 3200 lbs is far from a joke :naughty: Keep in mind that our CLS63 sedans are 4200 lbs, 1000 more lbs than a crappy old Z06. While our tuned CLS63's are a force to be reckoned with, be very weary of pulling along side of a stock Z06 and think that you're going to take him. If he has mod's, even just a few bolt on's, it's going to get ugly for you really quick :rolf: I know the Z06 is a great car. But the driver factor plays a larger role than it does in ours. Personally Id get one but Im so damn lazy and tired of rowing. My last car with a manny was my 996TT. |
Originally Posted by Vic55
(Post 5017912)
I know the Z06 is a great car. But the driver factor plays a larger role than it does in ours. Personally Id get one but Im so damn lazy and tired of rowing. My last car with a manny was my 996TT. |
yeah their like 1100 lbs lighter. thats a lot.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any. |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5018215)
yeah their like 1100 lbs lighter. thats a lot.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any. |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5018215)
yeah their like 1100 lbs lighter. thats a lot.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any. They come with LSD, traction control and also something called active handling. Despite the fact that it's built by Chevrolet, it's a very advanced performance machine :rolf: |
Originally Posted by mainly
(Post 5018215)
yeah their like 1100 lbs lighter. thats a lot.
but from a dig couldnt they just leave there traction control on? or do they not come with any. |
Originally Posted by Marc
(Post 5016521)
Congrats on the passes! You're trapping a solid 1-2 MPH higher than Renntech and also putting down 26 RWHP more as well:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23298.html Were your runs on straight 93 octane or did you mix in some race fuel? |
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
(Post 5030694)
Yep, the V-Tech tune is amazing. I'm running 93 octane because it's readily available to me here. The tune is actually for 91 octane :y
|
Originally Posted by wheelsloose
(Post 5054414)
Ready, do you have factory LSD option or aftermarket? Is stock one at only 30% locking really worth it and help any with off the line starts?
|
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
(Post 5054455)
I have the factory LSD which is 40% locking. It's definitely working. No wheel spin off the line launching just off idle. As you can tell by the time slips it's working very well for me :D
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands