Beauphus CLS **PICS & VIDEO**
#129
probably gonna do a bandpass ported through the rear deck as well - but no 15's for me. had those in high school. i stick with my 10's. BTW the amp is the new HD900/5. i am excited to see how it sounds. i have heard its amazing. hard to imagine that much power comes from such a small amp. technology is amazing. when i was younger an equally powerful amp was at least 5 times the size...
#131
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
From: MICHIGAN
2001 E55 - 2008 CLS63 -2016 F-150
your ride is absolutly amazing ,Rims look pimp! that looks **** lowered like that and I would drop it everytime i was parked somwhere lol .. goodluck with rest of build truly inspirational work
#132
I thought those were at least 12's comparing them to the amp. Yes things are a lot smaller these days. I have some old equipment laying around that I haven't used in years I'm going to try and knock the dust off some stuff. If the box seems to big I will down size my speaker size as well. I just want something that I can tune very low. I used to own a stereo store shoot almost 15 years ago things have really changed. But the basics are still the same.
#134
I thought those were at least 12's comparing them to the amp. Yes things are a lot smaller these days. I have some old equipment laying around that I haven't used in years I'm going to try and knock the dust off some stuff. If the box seems to big I will down size my speaker size as well. I just want something that I can tune very low. I used to own a stereo store shoot almost 15 years ago things have really changed. But the basics are still the same.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/class...#ht_791wt_1167
i even considered running the 2 10's with it but i wanted a smaller amp. the PC2350 is pretty big
#135
#136
talk about old school - i am selling one of my old amps on ebay right now. PPI PC2350. its a monster...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/class...#ht_791wt_1167
i even considered running the 2 10's with it but i wanted a smaller amp. the PC2350 is pretty big
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/class...#ht_791wt_1167
i even considered running the 2 10's with it but i wanted a smaller amp. the PC2350 is pretty big
#138
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: DC area
2003 S600, 1988 RX-7 single turbo vert, 1998 BMW 740IL
Beauphus,
Keep up the good work on a sweet car. I don't even own a CLS and I am excited to see that finished. I also know from building rotary rx7's that when you are working on a new design that no one else has tried you don't want to let all the build ingredients out or any dyno numbers until it's complete which is totally understandable. For half the reason is for people to nit pick and tell you your setup is not going to work blah blah blah. The other half of the reason is this forum is being watched by the tuners and parts designers that would love to steal what you have done via R&D on your own dime and make bucks off that.
I was one of the first to have a stock port 2 rotor FC3S lay down 500 on pump gas years ago when the bench mark was 400 for a daily "street car". I worked with some smart guys at Precision turbo who were huge in the grand national/buick/mustang drag world and they built a turbo for me against all conventional wisdom of what historically has worked on a rotary and went the other way with huge results. Now high 500's on pump is a everyday thing. So keep up the good work and as you know most of us can't wait to see the results of that beast.
Keep up the good work on a sweet car. I don't even own a CLS and I am excited to see that finished. I also know from building rotary rx7's that when you are working on a new design that no one else has tried you don't want to let all the build ingredients out or any dyno numbers until it's complete which is totally understandable. For half the reason is for people to nit pick and tell you your setup is not going to work blah blah blah. The other half of the reason is this forum is being watched by the tuners and parts designers that would love to steal what you have done via R&D on your own dime and make bucks off that.
I was one of the first to have a stock port 2 rotor FC3S lay down 500 on pump gas years ago when the bench mark was 400 for a daily "street car". I worked with some smart guys at Precision turbo who were huge in the grand national/buick/mustang drag world and they built a turbo for me against all conventional wisdom of what historically has worked on a rotary and went the other way with huge results. Now high 500's on pump is a everyday thing. So keep up the good work and as you know most of us can't wait to see the results of that beast.
#139
Beauphus,
Keep up the good work on a sweet car. I don't even own a CLS and I am excited to see that finished. I also know from building rotary rx7's that when you are working on a new design that no one else has tried you don't want to let all the build ingredients out or any dyno numbers until it's complete which is totally understandable. For half the reason is for people to nit pick and tell you your setup is not going to work blah blah blah. The other half of the reason is this forum is being watched by the tuners and parts designers that would love to steal what you have done via R&D on your own dime and make bucks off that.
I was one of the first to have a stock port 2 rotor FC3S lay down 500 on pump gas years ago when the bench mark was 400 for a daily "street car". I worked with some smart guys at Precision turbo who were huge in the grand national/buick/mustang drag world and they built a turbo for me against all conventional wisdom of what historically has worked on a rotary and went the other way with huge results. Now high 500's on pump is a everyday thing. So keep up the good work and as you know most of us can't wait to see the results of that beast.
Keep up the good work on a sweet car. I don't even own a CLS and I am excited to see that finished. I also know from building rotary rx7's that when you are working on a new design that no one else has tried you don't want to let all the build ingredients out or any dyno numbers until it's complete which is totally understandable. For half the reason is for people to nit pick and tell you your setup is not going to work blah blah blah. The other half of the reason is this forum is being watched by the tuners and parts designers that would love to steal what you have done via R&D on your own dime and make bucks off that.
I was one of the first to have a stock port 2 rotor FC3S lay down 500 on pump gas years ago when the bench mark was 400 for a daily "street car". I worked with some smart guys at Precision turbo who were huge in the grand national/buick/mustang drag world and they built a turbo for me against all conventional wisdom of what historically has worked on a rotary and went the other way with huge results. Now high 500's on pump is a everyday thing. So keep up the good work and as you know most of us can't wait to see the results of that beast.
#140
Get used to it bro, that's what happens here be it Dyno #'s Track ET's Trap speeds (some guys argue about their girlfriends clothes, don't go to off topic w/out CSI jumpsuit) etc this is "Fight Club"
#147
#148
#149
so when are you heading down to the track?
#150