CLS 55 or 63?
So..the 55 has the supercharger, ***** out torque, and my friend that owns a 55 Kleeman Stage 4, says get that and not the 63.
The guys at Buckhead Imports (excellent shop) says the 55 is awesome, but the 63 is newer and NA. That I may like the feel of the 55 better than the 63, but both are excellent choices.
Last, I don't want the new body style (2012) sticking with the 2006-2011 range. I have spotted some 55's black on black in between 30-45K miles on them in excellent shape. At the end of the day, which one should I get? Which would have more issues from the owners out there?
Thoughts and suggestions are welcome, thanks in advance.
Brakes are full hydraulic, no SBC as on the 55.
Newer engine tech
I don't plan on modding the car engine wise.
The 63 I am looking at is in great condition, only 30K miles on it. CarFax and Autocheck are clean, full service history, service A just completed on it. Driving up to take a look at it.
Any comments or feedback with the 07 CLS63's are welcome.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The 55 is more seat kick for sure and most likely faster , but i thought to myself the 63 is already fast enough and how many times did I really run into a car equivalent to 500hp. Not much and most of time traffic, etc..so I the 63 won out.
Last edited by 150shot; Dec 30, 2013 at 06:21 PM.
thanks
I was on the fence, scrutinizing, but I just said what the hell and pulled the trigger. The dealer knocked off another $2K just to appease me.
I was on the fence, scrutinizing, but I just said what the hell and pulled the trigger. The dealer knocked off another $2K just to appease me.

I was on the fence, scrutinizing, but I just said what the hell and pulled the trigger. The dealer knocked off another $2K just to appease me.

did you get an extended warranty? how much?

As he said..at that price it was really a steal.
Perhaps it was the conversations we had about Brazilian women with nice racks, partying in Miami, and his dogs. Convo helps at times?
I was on the fence, scrutinizing, but I just said what the hell and pulled the trigger. The dealer knocked off another $2K just to appease me.

Perhaps, the front brakes and rotors will be higher on the 63 tis true. Price is actually around $2300 on the parts which is rotors and pads. On the 55 however, $700 is a stretch even by an indie it will be a little higher than that. Check on Pelican Parts, the rotors/pads for the front are a little over $700 on parts, where are you getting your pads/rotors from? On my 500 the front brakes were around $800 with pads/rotors/labor with an indie. Dealer, around $1100.
I don't know about reliability, but I heard conflicting stories from tech's. Some said the 55 is better, some said the 63 was better and more efficient, and you would not need to worry about pulley/sc. The SC needs service too, and that is not cheap. After consulting with performance shops, indies, MB techs/service managers, it was a toss up as there were pro's/con's to each.
At the end the consensus, it was if get the 55 you have older technology, easier to mod. 63, newer technology, if you don't care about modding the engine, fine. I don't want to do any mods on the engine..so there it was.
One of the main issues I heard about on the 63, is to make sure you get the oil changed when required and service the transmission. This is a no brainer, you should get that done on ANY car. (Some stink was made about ticking or valve issues back some time ago.)
Let's not forget about the thread where some lady's S550 (or 63?) seized from not changing the oil until 68K miles. WTF?
On my CLS500, the front right went around 80K miles or so..if I recall. Lasted a long time on that one.







