C32 vs M3 depreciation
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
C32 vs M3 depreciation
I currently own a 1997 BMW M3 with 75,000 miles on it. This is my fourth consecutive BMW. Next month, I will have owned my M3 for 6 years. As unbelievable as it might sound, my car is stiil worth approximately 55% of my original purchase price.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Re: C32 vs M3 depreciation
Originally posted by Denis54
I currently own a 1997 BMW M3 with 75,000 miles on it. This is my fourth consecutive BMW. Next month, I will have owned my M3 for 6 years. As unbelievable as it might sound, my car is stiil worth approximately 55% of my original purchase price.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
I currently own a 1997 BMW M3 with 75,000 miles on it. This is my fourth consecutive BMW. Next month, I will have owned my M3 for 6 years. As unbelievable as it might sound, my car is stiil worth approximately 55% of my original purchase price.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
as my knowledge Mercedes-Benz has always been holding better values than the BMW. The 97 C36 AMG probably still has around 25k in value.
model change is what make the value depreciate FAST. for the C-class which came into the state as 01 model won't be changed for at least 5-6 years. the 3-er will have the complete make over in late 05 as 06 model, which will be a year early than the next C. i would think that the C32 would held better value.
But, i don't think that your wife will mind learning how to drive the SMG if you truly wants the M3. It's not that hard to learn, just put the gear in N and start the engine like you would with the manual car.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
C32 AMG
Re: C32 vs M3 depreciation
Originally posted by Denis54
I currently own a 1997 BMW M3 with 75,000 miles on it. This is my fourth consecutive BMW. Next month, I will have owned my M3 for 6 years. As unbelievable as it might sound, my car is stiil worth approximately 55% of my original purchase price.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
I currently own a 1997 BMW M3 with 75,000 miles on it. This is my fourth consecutive BMW. Next month, I will have owned my M3 for 6 years. As unbelievable as it might sound, my car is stiil worth approximately 55% of my original purchase price.
The new M3 is a fantastic car. However, it has a rough ride and does not have an automatic transmission. I will spare you the details, but a manual transmission is not an option for me anymore (SMG is good but too complicated for my wife).
All this to say that I am now thinking that a C32 could be a perfect car for me. How do you think a C32 will depreciate compared to a new M3.
Also, how do you compare the 2 cars.
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 711
Likes: 1
Is your 97 M3 an auto?
If your 97 is not auto and you are concerned about $ just get the 97-98 M3 auto sedan. $23k for a perfect car with some mileage. Won't catch a C32, but sounds like it would be a good car for you. Getting into a C32 or M3 new is going to be a 60K proposition.
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
w202 C220
I paid $25,000.00 for my 2000 C230K Sport a year ago, and I just checked the Kelly Blue Book value last week. I've added 30k miles in this past year (I do a lot of commuting), and the retail value on my car is still a little over $25,000.00. Can't beat that...Mercedes-Benz baby.
-Faheem
-Faheem
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
SLK 350 '05
i agree....mercedes benz seem to depreciate in a very wierd way.
last week, i saw a C36 going for 40k canadian, that's about 27Kusa. and i saw a C43 going for 56k canadian!! i was like wtf?! is this thing a depreciation buster? 56k canadian would equal 38kusa around....
seems like they hold their value very very well.
last week, i saw a C36 going for 40k canadian, that's about 27Kusa. and i saw a C43 going for 56k canadian!! i was like wtf?! is this thing a depreciation buster? 56k canadian would equal 38kusa around....
seems like they hold their value very very well.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 17
From: Chicagoland, IL
09 C63
Sorry... 47k for a 97 M3 nope. I bought a 1998 M3 4 door (a little more rare than the 2 door but let's keep going) for $41000 including taxes (out the door). Sold this car for $34000 last month.
That's right, 5 years of use - I added about 10k in parts that went with the car so really cost of ownership was $50 or so. Still not a bad return.
And I bought a C230 Coupe (cuz I wanted one!) Hopefully I can see a similar return.
That's right, 5 years of use - I added about 10k in parts that went with the car so really cost of ownership was $50 or so. Still not a bad return.
And I bought a C230 Coupe (cuz I wanted one!) Hopefully I can see a similar return.
Trending Topics
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally posted by peet
Sorry... 47k for a 97 M3 nope. I bought a 1998 M3 4 door (a little more rare than the 2 door but let's keep going) for $41000 including taxes (out the door). Sold this car for $34000 last month.
That's right, 5 years of use - I added about 10k in parts that went with the car so really cost of ownership was $50 or so. Still not a bad return.
And I bought a C230 Coupe (cuz I wanted one!) Hopefully I can see a similar return.
Sorry... 47k for a 97 M3 nope. I bought a 1998 M3 4 door (a little more rare than the 2 door but let's keep going) for $41000 including taxes (out the door). Sold this car for $34000 last month.
That's right, 5 years of use - I added about 10k in parts that went with the car so really cost of ownership was $50 or so. Still not a bad return.
And I bought a C230 Coupe (cuz I wanted one!) Hopefully I can see a similar return.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
From: NYC
C32 AMG, C300 Sport
hard to determine the values...
A '97 4D M3 with about 60k miles would sell today for about 28 grand. I dont know how much they cost new so cant give you a percentage of original value (which is an important factor). A comparably equipped C36 would sell today for about $29,500. New this car was about 51 grand plus options. 6 years and 60k miles the car is still about 55% of original value. Its actually more since the options depreciate much faster. I hear they both hold the values fairly well and the difference looks minimal.
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
w202 C220
Before I got my C230k, I was looking at a 95 BMW M3 coupe, and I broke the 50k mile mark on it when I took it for a test drive...and the guy wanted $25k for it...so I highly doubt a 97 M3 could go for $47k...unless that thing has been souped up so much it can fly...?
-Faheem
-Faheem
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Thanks to all those that posted a reply. Sorry I could not post any answers as I was travelling.
I paid CDN $60 for my car and have been offered CDN $33. I feel the buyer will probably be ready to pay a little more.
I test drove an SMG2 and agree it is fanstastic. I doubt my wife would be willing to even try to learn it. She is the least "techno" inclined person I know. She is 54 so it is getting pretty difficult to change her habits. I often think that instead of one 54 years old wife, I would be much better of with 2 that are 27.... (Just joking)
The reasons why I am less interested by the new M3 are:
Automatic transmission to please my wife.
Rough ride of the new M3. My 97 is not smooth but the new ones are wost. I hope the C32 is smoother. I just retired and will now travel more. I want a car with a smoother ride than what the new M3 offers.
4 doors for the C32 vs 2 for the M3.. My present M3 is the 4 door version and I prefer this
Boy racer look of the M3. I prefer the understated look of the C32
I paid CDN $60 for my car and have been offered CDN $33. I feel the buyer will probably be ready to pay a little more.
I test drove an SMG2 and agree it is fanstastic. I doubt my wife would be willing to even try to learn it. She is the least "techno" inclined person I know. She is 54 so it is getting pretty difficult to change her habits. I often think that instead of one 54 years old wife, I would be much better of with 2 that are 27.... (Just joking)
The reasons why I am less interested by the new M3 are:
Automatic transmission to please my wife.
Rough ride of the new M3. My 97 is not smooth but the new ones are wost. I hope the C32 is smoother. I just retired and will now travel more. I want a car with a smoother ride than what the new M3 offers.
4 doors for the C32 vs 2 for the M3.. My present M3 is the 4 door version and I prefer this
Boy racer look of the M3. I prefer the understated look of the C32
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 711
Likes: 1
Get the C32 then
C32 then, no doubt. You will love it right out of the box.
Looks like the depreciation will be similar to the E46M3, more importantly, the C32 fits your needs well. I am sure you will never feel disappointed.
Looks like the depreciation will be similar to the E46M3, more importantly, the C32 fits your needs well. I am sure you will never feel disappointed.
