Considering 03 C32 over 02 M5 ?
I really miss having a manual transmission, though. Take my words with a grain of salt, because I'm biased against slushboxes.
I really miss having a manual transmission, though. Take my words with a grain of salt, because I'm biased against slushboxes.
So the c32 doesn't shift fast enough for you?? And let me guess, you can probably shift faster with a manual?
My most recent instructor was surprised at how much of a surge there was when upshifting at speed. He expected an automatic tranny to have a lull between gears, not a lunge.
DSG (with a dual-clutch - not SMG) is the breakthrough that allows lightning fast shifts manually, and automatic function when necessary.
as far as looks, the E39 M5 is timeless. like the old 6-series you don't see people calling it old looking (unless they're not maintained properly).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My most recent instructor was surprised at how much of a surge there was when upshifting at speed. He expected an automatic tranny to have a lull between gears, not a lunge.
DSG (with a dual-clutch - not SMG) is the breakthrough that allows lightning fast shifts manually, and automatic function when necessary.
I'v drove friend's B5S4 with tiptronic and I have to say that it shifts slower than the AMG tranny however there's less delay from input at your finger tips.
On topic- if it's for your wife, and she's anything like my girl, then C32. While the M5 is unarguably a more accomplished car than the C32, it has a heavy clutch and many have a had a tough life.
The c32 is also a great car. The gearbox shifts very fast yet smoothly. I used to drive mine in W mode as in S mode the box seemed to get a little confused.
Good luck
My most recent instructor was surprised at how much of a surge there was when upshifting at speed. He expected an automatic tranny to have a lull between gears, not a lunge.
DSG (with a dual-clutch - not SMG) is the breakthrough that allows lightning fast shifts manually, and automatic function when necessary.
I'v drove friend's B5S4 with tiptronic and I have to say that it shifts slower than the AMG tranny however there's less delay from input at your finger tips.
But for the record, there no better automatic transmission for quick, firm upshifts. And the computer logic holding gears during hard driving and cornering is also fantastic. It's pretty clear that MB puts a lot of energy into building and configuring trannies. My Audi had a ZF transmission that behaved like an outsourced component.
E39 M5, W203 C32 are famous cars like M3 E46 Coupe. I am sure if one can find a good condition one, it is worth keeping.
If $ is not issue, a practical preowned C55 will give fun and joy for a long long time.
I ain't selling mine though.
We are going to a benz dealership which has a low klm C32 and C55 next week ..... Here in AUS an 05 C55 with around 20k klms on them go for around $125,000 ...... and an 03 C32 with around 30-40K klms on them go for around $85,000.
I am thinking that getting a 03 C32 in great condition.... doing pulley/ECU/exhaust etc for 400+hp, sprintbooster, maybee suspension upgrade, 19 inch wheel, xenons..... maybe a few other small mods, which I think would make it easily as good as the C55, maybe even better, for way less money.
The wife thinks the C55 is the go as it is newer ect ......... hmmmmmm, its a pretty hard decision. I guess with the C55, its hard to improve on unless I go the SC route, and seeing it is her car, that is probaly not an option.
Last edited by gkstar; Dec 18, 2006 at 05:50 PM.
Remarkably, people who owned 4.2s suggested that they were the better choice, and people who owned 2.7Ts felt otherwise! One thing that was true was that the 2.7T could be tuned, quite cheaply, to easily outperform the 4.2. So the 2.7T was the favorite of people who would be interested in customizing. I owned a 2.7T, and of course we were also jealous of the 4.2 owners!
The same could be said of the C32 versus C55. The C32 will be cheaper to buy, and it can be tuned (not so cheaply) to outrun the C55. Some folks are into tuning and most are not. So, if you're not into tuning, the C55 is clearly superior. But, like I used to say about the 4.2, if it was available at the same price as equivalent 2.7Ts, the choice would be easy. But in reality there's always a price premium, and it all comes down to how much a buck is worth.
It depends on your definition of better. Being that the car is for the wifey I think her mind is already made up as she is leaning towards the 55. I think the last thing on her mind is tuning potential. Another thing to consider is reliability. I know some of you may disagree but the 55 N/A motor is pretty much bulletproof compared to the periodic issues and added maintenance (replacing the Kompressor?) of the 32K or even the 55K powertrain. Peace of mind for a loved one might be worth the added money depending on the individual.






