Stage I - Evosport vs LET
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis MN
'03 C32 LET Stage I
Stage I - Evosport vs LET
Thinking of Stage I for my c32. Any opinions on which way to go: Evosport or LET motors. Evosport gives the HP gains on their site but I don't see anything for LET gains. Anybody has experience with LET HP gains?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
02 C32 AMG sold!
runs 20-21psi and the EVOsport runs 18.5psi.
But just for a reference, I'm running 18.5psi (ASP pulley) with EVOtech's ECU
(which is what you would get with the LET) I made 341RWHP & 343RWTQ.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 8
LET C32 2002
Its better to compare the 18 PSI against 18 PSI pulleys the LET pullies are cranking out 20-21 PSI. I would choose LET if you are looking for more hp then the 18 PSI pullies offer. I do think LET offers smaller mm pulleys with lower PSI but not positive...the LET pulleys come in 3 sizes I believe. The way the LET pulleys are made is better the way I read and you can change outer part of pulley easy to smaller mm size. I would suggest talking to both Evosport or LET and find out differences and which one offers more for the buck now and to add on to in the future...I think LET will win.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
FWIW, you'll make as much power (or possibly quite a bit more, depending on pulley mm choice) with LET, for considerably less $ out of pocket...
SPONSOR
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
...
we can have the same size pulley as evosport makes or we can go bigger than that, if you look around the forum, the LET cars are making good power for the money spent... We offer bigger pulley sizes because most people are looking for a little more... Call me and I will be glad to answer any questions that you have about our products... 
