Header question I have not found an answer to....
Sound fair?
They are $950 shipped. However, if you purchase a set of LET Headers and provide us with a before and after dyno showing the gains of the headers, then we will refund you $100.
So, buy them at $950, hit the dyno before and after, send us the graphs, get $100 back.

Sounds like a steal...
I for one think it's pretty nice for a tuner to offer this sort of discount - basically refunding the dyno expenses involved, plus a little extra $ in the pocket of the owner who took the initiative...
I for one think it's pretty nice for a tuner to offer this sort of discount - basically refunding the dyno expenses involved, plus a little extra $ in the pocket of the owner who took the initiative...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
A cursory search for ‘camero heders’ resulted in these beauties -


Photo credit scummit
Be that as it may, the pricey Hooker’s on my ’70 SS/RS Camaro have been well worth their expenditure.
The miniscule market for our MB hotrod parts, and its accompanying economies of scale, dictates our choices and their commensurate investment. I’ve posted previously that I’m not a huge fan dynamometer figures and how they are obtained owing to the variables involved. The treadmill is okay for the gym...but what the heck difference does it make if you haven’t realistically improved where it actually matters? It’s all about how it performs on the dragstrip or road course, IMHO.
To that end, I’ve already purchased LET headers. Baseline (sanctioned event) figures have been duly recorded.
I will share their results with the forum upon installation.
A cursory search for ‘camero heders’ resulted in these beauties -


Photo credit scummit
Be that as it may, the pricey Hooker’s on my ’70 SS/RS Camaro have been well worth their expenditure.
The miniscule market for our MB hotrod parts, and its accompanying economies of scale, dictates our choices and their commensurate investment. I’ve posted previously that I’m not a huge fan dynamometer figures and how they are obtained owing to the variables involved. The treadmill is okay for the gym...but what the heck difference does it make if you haven’t realistically improved where it actually matters? It’s all about how it performs on the dragstrip or road course, IMHO.
To that end, I’ve already purchased LET headers. Baseline (sanctioned event) figures have been duly recorded.
I will share their results with the forum upon installation.
Agreed. But the road "test" has all the same variables as a dyno with the addition of the biggest of them all - the driver. There's no driver on a dyno.
The Evosport header is a more efficient design than the LET header yet it is losing power? I think Evosport is a claiming 25hp gain with theirs.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...ighlight=R%26D
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...ighlight=R%26D
Original overview of HP expectations, Evosport 2002:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...ighlight=R%26D
As for the other comments, I completely agree that sub-$1000 ceramic-coated performance headers for our car is a steal, given the market for MB performance parts.
You can get high quality, full SS Boxster headers for about $600, because the manufacturers can make enough profit on the volume sold... that just doesn't happen with our cars... so for us all of the R&D expenses are spread across fewer units sold, resulting in higher price points.
The Evosport header is a more efficient design than the LET header yet it is losing power? I think Evosport is a claiming 25hp gain with theirs.I think the only way to really compare the products is to randomly pick a C32, install the Evosport headers, dyno it......... then swap the Evosport header with the LET header and then dyno the car again. It has to be same car, same dyno, same operator, and close weather conditions.
I truely believe in LET, as they are very honest in their claims and are doing a lot of research before they develop each part. That's why we are seeing awsome results with their pullies and headers

Keep up the good work guys






