Baseline dyno...
04-15-2008, 06:15 PM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Baseline dyno...
Got a baseline dyno run today, pre-performance mods. Only thing done so far has been res-delete, and most agree that has no performance benefit. C32 didn't seem to like being dyno'd in 4th - kept being finicky and kicking down for the dyno operator, so the best runs were results from 3rd gear.
Anyway, I don't have a scanner, but here's the info off the printout:
Dynojet Dyno - "CF: UNCORRECTED" numbers
Max Power = 297.43 Max Torque = 288.51
A/F is a pretty flat 14:1 until the car is under heavy load, where it drops to a nice, flat 12:1
At the bottom of the page, it lists the Run Conditions as follows:
74.17 deg. F, 30.11 in-Hg, Humidity: 23%, UNCORRECTED: 1.00
Just thought I'd share... will let everyone know what "post-mod" runs look like as well, in a month or so.
Anyway, I don't have a scanner, but here's the info off the printout:
Dynojet Dyno - "CF: UNCORRECTED" numbers
Max Power = 297.43 Max Torque = 288.51
A/F is a pretty flat 14:1 until the car is under heavy load, where it drops to a nice, flat 12:1
At the bottom of the page, it lists the Run Conditions as follows:
74.17 deg. F, 30.11 in-Hg, Humidity: 23%, UNCORRECTED: 1.00
Just thought I'd share... will let everyone know what "post-mod" runs look like as well, in a month or so.
04-15-2008, 10:42 PM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Hey cdd,
Nope - went to Fabspeed in Ambler, PA. I tried calling Philly Dyno Works repeatedly, and no one answered - nor did they ever return the message I left, asking to schedule an appt. So, that was a bummer... from their website, they looked like a good shop to use - however, my first-impression of their customer service is that it isn't really up to par, unfortunately.
On the plus side, Jeremy and the other guys at Fabspeed are A++, top notch to be around and work with. Plus, for you local C55 guys, they're a Kleemann dealer - he was showing me some dyno runs they'd done on E55's and SLK55's... pretty impressive.
And yes, cdd is correct - it was a dynojet dyno - which I mentioned in the first post.
Nope - went to Fabspeed in Ambler, PA. I tried calling Philly Dyno Works repeatedly, and no one answered - nor did they ever return the message I left, asking to schedule an appt. So, that was a bummer... from their website, they looked like a good shop to use - however, my first-impression of their customer service is that it isn't really up to par, unfortunately.
On the plus side, Jeremy and the other guys at Fabspeed are A++, top notch to be around and work with. Plus, for you local C55 guys, they're a Kleemann dealer - he was showing me some dyno runs they'd done on E55's and SLK55's... pretty impressive.
And yes, cdd is correct - it was a dynojet dyno - which I mentioned in the first post.
04-15-2008, 11:00 PM
#7
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Barbara & Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32, Cobra, 700hp Vespa
Looks very healthy. Here are my baseline numbers, SAE, STP, and Dynojet, for comparison.
Yours: 297.43/288.51
SAE - 276.2/267.4
STP - 287.3/278.2
Dynojet - 303.8/294.2
Yours: 297.43/288.51
SAE - 276.2/267.4
STP - 287.3/278.2
Dynojet - 303.8/294.2
Trending Topics
04-17-2008, 11:24 AM
#9
Wow! Healthy car!!
I got two dynos on 2 different days when basically stock on same dyno and same tech and numbers where uncorrected also:
With dirty K&N filters on a warmer day 286 whp 290 torque
New Green filters on a colder day 299 whp 290 torque
I think weather had a big help with the Greens...my first dyno is posted with AMG-Jerry's car and second on this forum somewhere.
I got two dynos on 2 different days when basically stock on same dyno and same tech and numbers where uncorrected also:
With dirty K&N filters on a warmer day 286 whp 290 torque
New Green filters on a colder day 299 whp 290 torque
I think weather had a big help with the Greens...my first dyno is posted with AMG-Jerry's car and second on this forum somewhere.
04-17-2008, 11:48 AM
#10
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
WOW with no upgrades those are great numbers. I have to get mine on the dyno soon. I will post my numbers as well. You got yourself a strong one there.
Got a baseline dyno run today, pre-performance mods. Only thing done so far has been res-delete, and most agree that has no performance benefit. C32 didn't seem to like being dyno'd in 4th - kept being finicky and kicking down for the dyno operator, so the best runs were results from 3rd gear.
Anyway, I don't have a scanner, but here's the info off the printout:
Dynojet Dyno - "CF: UNCORRECTED" numbers
Max Power = 297.43 Max Torque = 288.51
A/F is a pretty flat 14:1 until the car is under heavy load, where it drops to a nice, flat 12:1
At the bottom of the page, it lists the Run Conditions as follows:
74.17 deg. F, 30.11 in-Hg, Humidity: 23%, UNCORRECTED: 1.00
Just thought I'd share... will let everyone know what "post-mod" runs look like as well, in a month or so.
Anyway, I don't have a scanner, but here's the info off the printout:
Dynojet Dyno - "CF: UNCORRECTED" numbers
Max Power = 297.43 Max Torque = 288.51
A/F is a pretty flat 14:1 until the car is under heavy load, where it drops to a nice, flat 12:1
At the bottom of the page, it lists the Run Conditions as follows:
74.17 deg. F, 30.11 in-Hg, Humidity: 23%, UNCORRECTED: 1.00
Just thought I'd share... will let everyone know what "post-mod" runs look like as well, in a month or so.
