C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Bang for the buck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-24-2008 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
c3232c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: utah
02 c32 99 superduty
Bang for the buck

I would have to say for the total investment of 1200 dollars I am more than happy with the way my car has been running. I ran a 14.67 last year at the track and felt the car had more to give. So this year I picked up some used Renntech pullies,New LET HE, And some IK-20's. I ran a 14.12 with the esp going off till the 60 foot and a 30mph crosswind. I wanted to hit the 13's but because of the wind they decided to only let us run 1/8 mile. I did run a tenth quicker on my 1/8 because I learned how to heat up the drag radials so I know I am right there for a high 13. (4600 ft elevation) I tried to figure what my 1/4 would be using the 1/8 mile time but it came out higher than a 14.12 even though my 1/8 was quicker my last run. I guess our cars pull hard towards the top end.
Old 04-24-2008 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
hooleyboy's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 2
From: Glendale Arizona
C55,SL55,C63
Originally Posted by c3232c
I would have to say for the total investment of 1200 dollars I am more than happy with the way my car has been running. I ran a 14.67 last year at the track and felt the car had more to give. So this year I picked up some used Renntech pullies,New LET HE, And some IK-20's. I ran a 14.12 with the esp going off till the 60 foot and a 30mph crosswind. I wanted to hit the 13's but because of the wind they decided to only let us run 1/8 mile. I did run a tenth quicker on my 1/8 because I learned how to heat up the drag radials so I know I am right there for a high 13. (4600 ft elevation) I tried to figure what my 1/4 would be using the 1/8 mile time but it came out higher than a 14.12 even though my 1/8 was quicker my last run. I guess our cars pull hard towards the top end.

Elevation in Utah must be high. 14.1 sounds kinda slow my uneducated guess is you will be in the low 13's if you raced at a lower elevation. maybe think about getting an ECU flash from Renntech or Kleemann. i would say though down here in Phoenix you would be mopping cars up at the drags hitting low 13's and maybe even cracking 12's as other C32 with similar mods are in the 12's i think.
Old 04-24-2008 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
c3232c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: utah
02 c32 99 superduty
The elevation here sucks big time. I know when I raced my bike down there(speedworld) it was a whole lot faster at your elevation.
Old 04-25-2008 | 06:53 AM
  #4  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
hooleyboy's right - bone stock C32 times are typically mid-13's, similiarly modded C32s can hit 12's. As you mentioned, it's likely the elevation that's holding back your times - but heavy 19" wheels aren't helping either...
Old 04-25-2008 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
According to the NHRA altitude correction tables, there is a 0.6 to 0.7 seconds correction to your altitude (not factoring in DA and other weather conditions of course). So your stock run of 14.67 actually corrects down to 13.9 seconds which is still a little low. But there are so many factors involved that could've led to the slightly slower times: your launch technique, track prep (how much traction you lost), cross wind, temperature, humidity, tires, etc.....
Old 04-25-2008 | 02:49 PM
  #6  
c3232c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: utah
02 c32 99 superduty
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
According to the NHRA altitude correction tables, there is a 0.6 to 0.7 seconds correction to your altitude (not factoring in DA and other weather conditions of course). So your stock run of 14.67 actually corrects down to 13.9 seconds which is still a little low. But there are so many factors involved that could've led to the slightly slower times: your launch technique, track prep (how much traction you lost), cross wind, temperature, humidity, tires, etc.....
I will hit the track again soon to try and get into the 13's. The track prep was bad when I ran the 14.12, I was the first car down the right lane this year and the wind was blowing so hard when they were prepping the track you could see the VHT wasnt even hitting the ground. I will be happy with 13's at this altitude. I am pretty much done modding the car other than I want to see what code3's intake mod is. I will also try to bring up the rpm's when I launch to see if I can improve my 60' time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bang for the buck



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.