SL55 intake
01-15-2010, 09:00 PM
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
thats the c3 fitler for the c32. you remove the backing plate off of the intake and install the filter. i built one bigger than that for under 25$
Last edited by 320 dreamer; 01-15-2010 at 09:03 PM.
01-16-2010, 01:15 PM
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Keesler AFB, Gulfport, MS
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG
lolBang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
Last edited by SilverBulletAMG; 01-16-2010 at 01:17 PM.
01-16-2010, 02:01 PM
#28
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
My normal logic tells me air (like water) would travel the path of least resistance....the open TB and SC sucking it all in. Does the C3 style draw in some under hood air? Yeah. Enough to make a difference? None that has been proven.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
01-16-2010, 02:29 PM
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
My normal logic tells me air (like water) would travel the path of least resistance....the open TB and SC sucking it all in. Does the C3 style draw in some under hood air? Yeah. Enough to make a difference? None that has been proven.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
the dyno tests posted by the old c3 site were for pulley AND filter with no mods to the tubes.
i run full 3" tubes into gutted airboxes with k&n fiters and needswings devil horns. when i put the c3 style filter on i lost power , removed them and power was recovered. the smooth flow of cold air wins period
01-16-2010, 03:44 PM
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
My normal logic tells me air (like water) would travel the path of least resistance....the open TB and SC sucking it all in. Does the C3 style draw in some under hood air? Yeah. Enough to make a difference? None that has been proven.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
Bang for the buck, you cannot beat a C3 intake (or cheap DIY version) with larger intake tubes up front. I would love to be proven wrong and see something that shows the same (or higher) gains, has as good of a sound, and has as good throttle response for less $$.
