Just picked up an e90 M3, thinking of trading in the C55.
In a bind, man I love that C55, but I found a great deal on a used M3 and jumped on it. I have till Sat to return it, no questions asked. Still in the decision process......:confused: Help!
|
what's the year and mileage on the M3? Sedan or Coupe?
|
Grats, E90 M3 is a fantastic car, personally I wouldn't stay with the C55 as well unless I had piles of cash laying around.
|
Originally Posted by riverace
(Post 4575629)
Grats, E90 M3 is a fantastic car, personally I wouldn't stay with the C55 as well unless I had piles of cash laying around.
|
SCOOP!!!!!!!!!!! Long time!!! PM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by BK63amg
(Post 4575595)
what's the year and mileage on the M3? Sedan or Coupe?
|
Originally Posted by riverace
(Post 4575629)
Grats, E90 M3 is a fantastic car, personally I wouldn't stay with the C55 as well unless I had piles of cash laying around.
|
Originally Posted by Mark633CSi
(Post 4575636)
I work at one of the local BMW dealers here in town. The E90 M3 is a nice car. It's much meaner looking than the E92. I think you may miss the torque of the C55 however. If you keep it though, congrats!
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575646)
SCOOP!!!!!!!!!!! Long time!!! PM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575761)
ERIC MY BRUTHA!!! Good to see you're still around. You still pimpin that C350?
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575748)
'08, dark gray sedan, only 15K miles.
I am not sure if the newer DCT is better than the old SMG. |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575791)
What kind of tranny? If its the 6 speed, the throws are rather long and you will get tired of constant shifting because of the low torque.
I am not sure if the newer DCT is better than the old SMG. |
Isn't the E90 M3 supposed to be able to do 60mph in 3.9s? Does the lower torque still make it feel slower even if it's almost 1second faster than the C55?
I know it's a high revving engine and stuff, but I find it weird that it doesn't feel as fast even if it's faster. |
Originally Posted by Apox
(Post 4575800)
Isn't the E90 M3 supposed to be able to do 60mph in 3.9s? Does the lower torque still make it feel slower even if it's almost 1second faster than the C55?
I know it's a high revving engine and stuff, but I find it weird that it doesn't feel as fast even if it's faster. Anyone who tells you a car has low torque and is therefore slow, is an idiot. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575807)
E9x M3's get to 60 in about 4.2s.
Anyone who tells you a car has low torque and is therefore slow, is an idiot. In everyday life, any car that is low on torque will be slow. On a track is where the low torque ceases to be relevant because you have room to wind it up. Period. End of story. Any M3 owner who claims otherwise is an idiot, or fanboi. |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575834)
The 4.2 0-60 is for the track where you can max out every gear and hit every single shift point. In everyday life between lights, you will be lucky to get anywhere close to that number in an M3. In a C55 or any car of that type, you can consistenly hit the published 0-60 number, all you have to do is step on it. You can magazine race all you want, but that's the bottom line.
In everyday life, any car that is low on torque will be slow. On a track is where the low torque ceases to be relevant because you have room to wind it up. Period. End of story. Any M3 owner who claims otherwise is an idiot, or fanboi. I'm willing to bet with my DCT I'll be able to consistently be pretty close to that number day in and day out. All I have to do is step on it too. It doesn't sound like you understand gearing very well. |
He might mean when you're throwing your own gears...I have no doubt DCT cars can achieve their published 0-60 times in the real world without too much difficulty at all.
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575877)
So are you saying the C55 can hit published 0-60 times without maxing out every gear?
I'm willing to bet with my DCT I'll be able to consistently be pretty close to that number day in and day out. All I have to do is step on it too. It doesn't sound like you understand gearing very well. The C55 will hit published numbers consistently and with minimum fuss because it makes 370 ft-lbs at 4000 rpm. M3 makes peak torque (80 ft-lbs less) at what 5k? Where do you make your peak HP? 8k? C55 makes it at 5k. Fanbois who read magazines will only look at the HP number, without any understanding of where the power is delivered in the rev band. In the real world, you don't have room to let the RPMs climb. Any car that makes power at astronomical revs will be slower than cars that make power at low down in the band. Fact. Torque is more important in real life. Fact. I adore the M3, don't get me wrong. Let's not make this into an M3 versus AMG argument either. |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575901)
Dude, I'm an ex-M3 owner, so I understand it quite well. The problem seems to be that you don't understand RPMs very well.
The C55 will hit published numbers consistently and with minimum fuss because it makes 370 ft-lbs at 4000 rpm. M3 makes peak torque (80 ft-lbs less) at what 5k? Where do you make your peak HP? 8k? C55 makes it at 5k. Fanbois who read magazines will only look at the HP number, without any understanding of where the power is delivered in the rev band. In the real world, you don't have room to let the RPMs climb. Any car that makes power at astronomical revs will be slower than cars that make power at low down in the band. Fact. Torque is more important in real life. Fact. I adore the M3, don't get me wrong. Let's not make this into an M3 versus AMG argument either. Remember folks, torque is multiplied through the gearbox and drivetrain while HP is NOT. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575767)
Funny you posted this thread, I just got a E92 M3 back in July! BTW, I also moved to Irvine, we should meet up for a beer, I'd be willing to make the trip down to SD.
I love the white btw in the E9x with the black trim around the rearview mirrors, etc, it would have been my second choice next to black on black on black (which is the fastest color combo you know :rolleyes:) |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575791)
What kind of tranny? If its the 6 speed, the throws are rather long and you will get tired of constant shifting because of the low torque.
I am not sure if the newer DCT is better than the old SMG. You got that right. I haven't driven a manual since 2001, and with this one, you really have to know how to do it right, which I totally suck at right now.... DCT would have been my choice. I found another used '08 w/ DCT here, but it had 50K miles!! |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575912)
Wow, congrats!! how do you like your M3? What year is it. This is the first used car I've ever purchased, so I'm a little cautious as to how it was driven.
I love the white btw in the E9x with the black trim around the rearview mirrors, etc, it would have been my second choice next to black on black on black (which is the fastest color combo you know :rolleyes:) |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575799)
I love my DCT. It's nothing short of incredible.
lol |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575807)
E9x M3's get to 60 in about 4.2s.
Anyone who tells you a car has low torque and is therefore slow, is an idiot. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575924)
I gotta learn to launch this biatch tho....right now it feels slower than my C55.
|
Seems to me, if you have room to actually do full 0-60, then you have more than enough room to to let a car rev out. Numbers are numbers. Yes, mag testers do tend to be pretty hard on the car when they test (launch control, dumping clutch from 4k, etc), but like E and others have said, a dual clutch auto will be able to meet the numbers just as easy as the full auto Benz does.
Now, in an impromptu roll on type race, a car with more torque might have the initial advantage, but again, if the road is long enough to get up to highway speeds, then the car with the hp/lb advantage or gearing advantages will catch up. |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575834)
The 4.2 0-60 is for the track where you can max out every gear and hit every single shift point. In everyday life between lights, you will be lucky to get anywhere close to that number in an M3. In a C55 or any car of that type, you can consistenly hit the published 0-60 number, all you have to do is step on it. You can magazine race all you want, but that's the bottom line.
In everyday life, any car that is low on torque will be slow. On a track is where the low torque ceases to be relevant because you have room to wind it up. Period. End of story. Any M3 owner who claims otherwise is an idiot, or fanboi. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575920)
Thanks Scoop!!!! It's a 2011. Love it.
|
Originally Posted by billbillw
(Post 4575927)
Seems to me, if you have room to actually do full 0-60, then you have more than enough room to to let a car rev out. Numbers are numbers. Yes, mag testers do tend to be pretty hard on the car when they test (launch control, dumping clutch from 4k, etc), but like E and others have said, a dual clutch auto will be able to meet the numbers just as easy as the full auto Benz does.
Now, in an impromptu roll on type race, a car with more torque might have the initial advantage, but again, if the road is long enough to get up to highway speeds, then the car with the hp/lb advantage or gearing advantages will catch up. Its a question of driver effort and stress. Hitting the number in a torquey car is low stress, hitting the same number in a screamer is hard work and stressful. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575926)
Do not be afraid to take it to 8.3k.
BTW, I almost pulled the trigger on an '11 S4, but it sold 2 days b4 I had a chance to test drive it. The wife absolutely fell in love with that car, but pimped out and new, it was alot more than this car. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575939)
well said. I'd be lucky to see 5.2 up to now. However, a buddy of mine at work asked me if I'd engaged the "M" button and set the EDC to "Sport", and I'm like wha?? (see, I haven't even read the Owners Manual yet), so I just took it out at lunch and put it in that mode. wow. big difference. Throttle response is where I'd expect it now....
The power button doesn't add power it just increases throttle response. BTW you can set the car to startup in a particular power and EDC mode. The M button tailors these settings so you can drive along how you would normally drive and use the M button for agressive driving. Having a 6-speed somewhat reduces the need for the M button, some of the settings pertain to DCT shift agressiveness.
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575941)
Damn, that had to put you back...:eek:
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575951)
How well does the "auto" mode work in your car? The wife would have required that mode if I had one with DCT. With the manual, she's less likely to take it.
BTW, I almost pulled the trigger on an '11 S4, but it sold 2 days b4 I had a chance to test drive it. The wife absolutely fell in love with that car, but pimped out and new, it was alot more than this car. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575952)
Sport EDC is too harsh, I like Normal when driving agressively and stay in Comfort most of the time.
The power button doesn't add power it just increases throttle response. BTW you can set the car to startup in a particular power and EDC mode. The M button tailors these settings so you can drive along how you would normally drive and use the M button for agressive driving. Having a 6-speed somewhat reduces the need for the M button, some of the settings pertain to DCT shift agressiveness. Wasn't cheap!! Sticker was $76k. She's fully loaded. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575959)
Ouch. C63 out of the question? Note: the last time I had the benz in (replaced cracked rearview mirror blinker) I browsed the showroom and they had a C63 for like 82K, well loaded.
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575954)
Auto works well, just let it do it's thing. Have you had some seat time in a DCT equiped car? Just let me know and I'll shoot down there this weekend!! The question here is, do you want your wife to take out the M3?? HAHA.
Never driven a DCT, just an SMGII once. The wife gave the M3 a test drive and did o.k., but shifted WAY too soon, like 2.5K (!) I kept coaching, but that's just her. The total driving experience, brakes, handling, etc. is pretty damn impressive. |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4575965)
Absolutely considered the C63. Wonderful car. Brutish acceleration. I just liked the M3 better.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575967)
Next couple weeks are shot for me, with business travel and vaca to follow.....
Never driven a DCT, just an SMGII once. The wife gave the M3 a test drive and did o.k., but shifted WAY too soon, like 2.5K (!) I kept coaching, but that's just her. The total driving experience, brakes, handling, etc. is pretty damn impressive. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575970)
You see the Top Gear clip of the C63 vs RS4 vs M3 vs some old F1 car? Guess who won.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575970)
You see the Top Gear clip of the C63 vs RS4 vs M3 vs some old F1 car? Guess who won.
The 6.2 may be short lived though. When do we see the 5.5 TT in the C? God damn Mercedes and its ridiculously short model lifespan playing havoc with resale. |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575978)
Hahaha, that was a funny episode. If I remember right, the C63 ate its rear tires in just a few laps. lol
The 6.2 may be short lived though. When do we see the 5.5 TT in the C? God damn Mercedes and its ridiculously short model lifespan playing havoc with resale. The M will be a TT V6 next as well, I think. Hopefully the gas mileage will improve. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575924)
I gotta learn to launch this biatch tho....right now it feels slower than my C55.
|
Originally Posted by michael kuzni
(Post 4576003)
does it have a CDV? there's a way to get rid of that if you do.
|
like I said, I don't actually "own" this car yet, I'm still on a 5-day trial period. I have an appointment with BMW Fri afternoon to give it a good check-out. I'll make my decision after that.
|
Originally Posted by michael kuzni
(Post 4576003)
does it have a CDV? there's a way to get rid of that if you do.
|
Originally Posted by michael kuzni
(Post 4576003)
does it have a CDV? there's a way to get rid of that if you do.
|
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4576009)
+1. CDV delete is a must in a 6 speed.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576017)
Don't laugh, I'm a noob. What's CDV?
|
Off topic: Hey, Eric, I was browsing around and M3 site, M3forum.net, and I found some posts from Pete (AMGPower). Looks like he sold his e46...??
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576021)
clutch delay valve
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576026)
Off topic: Hey, Eric, I was browsing around and M3 site, M3forum.net, and I found some posts from Pete (AMGPower). Looks like he sold his e46...??
|
for old times sake.
TOP!!!!!!!!!!! |
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576016)
There is but it's not restrictive and doesn't need modification on e9x M3's
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576040)
for old times sake.
TOP!!!!!!!!!!! |
Originally Posted by michael kuzni
(Post 4576057)
so it lets you launch past 4k? i'm not familiar with the one in the e9x m3, i heard the e46 m3 had one.
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576070)
not sure about the 6MT, the DCT Launch control dumps at up to 5K I beleive.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576080)
The 6MT is faaaaaar superior. I can dump it at 7K.
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576084)
LOL! and it's slower than your C55?!
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576099)
Did you go right from your C350 to the M?
|
Man, the other day, I was just getting off work and a black M3 with the plates E90 M3 pulled next to me, I Soooooooo wanted to race, but we're on a main street with lots of people and traffic, so I'm like can't do it. He kinda took off like he wanted to race, but I held back.
Then about 3 blocks later, were two cops parked just outside their car. PHEW!! Then about 4 more blocks, the light turned Yellow and I stopped, he floored it, so I lost him. DAMN! Congrats on the car, I LOVE the way those cars look! :y |
Originally Posted by Gramma_Benz
(Post 4576191)
Man, the other day, I was just getting off work and a black M3 with the plates E90 M3 pulled next to me, I Soooooooo wanted to race, but we're on a main street with lots of people and traffic, so I'm like can't do it. He kinda took off like he wanted to race, but I held back.
Then about 3 blocks later, were two cops parked just outside their car. PHEW!! Then about 4 more blocks, the light turned Yellow and I stopped, he floored it, so I lost him. DAMN! Congrats on the car, I LOVE the way those cars look! :y I'm sure you'll get your chance to race one another day. Good luck! |
STEVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
Originally Posted by AsianML
(Post 4576241)
STEVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576278)
'sup, Vinh! How's life?
What have you been up to? |
I have an '09 E90 M3 and love it. Definitly a better car than the C55, no offense to anyone here, C55 is sweet, but the E9X M3 takes it any day, C63 is another story.
|
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575901)
Dude, I'm an ex-M3 owner, so I understand it quite well. The problem seems to be that you don't understand RPMs very well.
The C55 will hit published numbers consistently and with minimum fuss because it makes 370 ft-lbs at 4000 rpm. M3 makes peak torque (80 ft-lbs less) at what 5k? Where do you make your peak HP? 8k? C55 makes it at 5k. Fanbois who read magazines will only look at the HP number, without any understanding of where the power is delivered in the rev band. In the real world, you don't have room to let the RPMs climb. Any car that makes power at astronomical revs will be slower than cars that make power at low down in the band. Fact. Torque is more important in real life. Fact. I adore the M3, don't get me wrong. Let's not make this into an M3 versus AMG argument either. |
Originally Posted by SpencerAMG
(Post 4576340)
I have an '09 E90 M3 and love it. Definitly a better car than the C55, no offense to anyone here, C55 is sweet, but the E9X M3 takes it any day, C63 is another story.
Takes it any day in what regard?? Be specific, or as my kids say, Pacific?? |
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
(Post 4575950)
Sure. Except you look downright silly revving to 9k going to get a gallon of milk. Not to mention the NVH associated with astronomical revs will really wear you down pretty quickly.
Its a question of driver effort and stress. Hitting the number in a torquey car is low stress, hitting the same number in a screamer is hard work and stressful. ^^ You sound like you've driven my old S2000?? Hard work, nah, stressful, yes!! |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575760)
You nailed it with the torque. I know on paper the M should be faster, but it doesn't feel like it. The frickin AMG is an ANIMAL off the line and alot easier to push to its limits, the M you need to learn how to keep it in it's power band, like well above 4000 rpm....
|
Originally Posted by SpencerAMG
(Post 4576340)
I have an '09 E90 M3 and love it. Definitly a better car than the C55, no offense to anyone here, C55 is sweet, but the E9X M3 takes it any day, C63 is another story.
|
Originally Posted by Mark633CSi
(Post 4575636)
It's much meaner looking than the E92.
|
Difference between SMG and DCT? Former 05 M3 owner.
|
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576017)
Don't laugh, I'm a noob. What's CDV?
Here you go - all you need to know. Have a read here: http://www.zeckhausen.com/CDV.htm Had one in my '01 540i and once I learned about it I had it removed. You need to be careful because removing it can result in warranty issues - should you have a problem with the trans. You should remove and replace with one that has the internals removed - such as the one Dave Z. sells. |
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576490)
Difference between SMG and DCT? Former 05 M3 owner.
DCT (aka DKG, PDK) uses dual clutches, one for even gears and another for odd gears. Shifts are near instantaneous as the gearbox is essentially always in 2 gears at the same time. When an upshift or downshift occurs, the next gear is selected, and driveline power is switched by engaging the opposing clutch while disengaging the other clutch at the same time. The E9x M3's DCT is manufactured by Getrag and is similar to the unit used by Ferrari in the California. |
Like old times on this thread....welcome back, scoop!
|
Originally Posted by AsianML
(Post 4576324)
Life is good! Glad to see you're still in the car scene. I'm in my sophomore year of college now! Time flies huh.
What have you been up to? |
Oh, and topp lol....
|
Nicely done Chappy
|
Originally Posted by Chappy
(Post 4576562)
Oh, and topp lol....
|
Originally Posted by Chappy
(Post 4576555)
Like old times on this thread....welcome back, scoop!
Defectors should not be allowed back!!!:naughty: |
At least Jerry is still making other MB's faster and faster!
|
Originally Posted by Gramma_Benz
(Post 4576682)
At least Jerry is still making other MB's faster and faster!
Problem is, he's also making the M3/5 faster as well!! |
I just beat an E90 M3 the other day....nice car but the M3's don't compare to the AMG's IMO
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576542)
SMG is a single clutch, electro-hydraulically actuated manual transmission
DCT (aka DKG, PDK) uses dual clutches, one for even gears and another for odd gears. Shifts are near instantaneous as the gearbox is essentially always in 2 gears at the same time. When an upshift or downshift occurs, the next gear is selected, and driveline power is switched by engaging the opposing clutch while disengaging the other clutch at the same time. The E9x M3's DCT is manufactured by Getrag and is similar to the unit used by Ferrari in the California. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4576026)
Off topic: Hey, Eric, I was browsing around and M3 site, M3forum.net, and I found some posts from Pete (AMGPower). Looks like he sold his e46...??
It was the shortest time I have owned a car ever!!! I will say 1 thing though, I bought the car for 25,500 and sold it for 23k with its goodies... I have never bought and sold a car with such a close margin... Going back to an AMG car as soon as I get my business off the ground... |
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576490)
Difference between SMG and DCT? Former 05 M3 owner.
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
(Post 4576670)
Except Chappy he's ditching the C55 and going to the dark side.............Jerry of EC did the same to us about a year ago with his M5............
Defectors should not be allowed back!!!:naughty:
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576751)
wtf??? I feel stupid now for not keeping up with BMW. This sounds... AWESOME. I take it a lot of the clunkiness of the SMG is no more? Any downsides?
|
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576751)
wtf??? I feel stupid now for not keeping up with BMW. This sounds... AWESOME. I take it a lot of the clunkiness of the SMG is no more? Any downsides?
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4575760)
You nailed it with the torque. I know on paper the M should be faster, but it doesn't feel like it. The frickin AMG is an ANIMAL off the line and alot easier to push to its limits, the M you need to learn how to keep it in it's power band, like well above 4000 rpm....
Car & Driver is the only magazine that does the rolling 5-60mph timed acceleration run. This represents what most people do on the streets, as it would be foolish to routinely drop the clutch from a high rpm launch, which is what is always done to get the fastest acceleration runs from a standing start (the typical 0-60mph, 0-120mph, 1/4 mile, etc). 2007 test: E92 M3 6 speed manual: 5-60mph: 5.1 seconds 2005 test: C55 AMG 5-60mph: 4.9 seconds There is no doubt that the E9x M3 will catch up and overtake the C55 at higher speeds, but at the beginning, the C55 likely could be ahead at 60mph and beyond. This applies to rolling starts at highway speeds too. The E9x M3 is all about being in the proper gear and being high in the rpm range to get that maximum push you back in the seat feel for maximum acceleration, whereas AMG cars like the C55 and C63 have abundant torque lower down in the rpm range, which is more easily accessible. Different power delivery, and different type of fun. I personally love the E90 M3. If I didn't love my C55 so much as a "do everything" type of car that keeps me looking good at lapping days, I would have gotten a E90 M3 already with M-DCT and adaptive dampers (the two things which I wish the C63 has). |
Originally Posted by 55fanatic
(Post 4576758)
all of the clunkiness is gone... SMG technology is old, DCT is the new hotness... if for some reason it fails though, these trans units are like $15k+ and not just any shop can replace them or rebuild them
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576839)
take one for a spin you won't be dissapointed.
|
Originally Posted by PC Valkyrie
(Post 4576891)
What you are feeling is probably real. If a 6MT E9x M3 is starting off the line without a proper high rpm launch, a C55 could very well be ahead at the beginning. In fact, there are numbers to show this.
Car & Driver is the only magazine that does the rolling 5-60mph timed acceleration run. This represents what most people do on the streets, as it would be foolish to routinely drop the clutch from a high rpm launch, which is what is always done to get the fastest acceleration runs from a standing start (the typical 0-60mph, 0-120mph, 1/4 mile, etc). 2007 test: E92 M3 6 speed manual: 5-60mph: 5.1 seconds 2005 test: C55 AMG 5-60mph: 4.9 seconds There is no doubt that the E9x M3 will catch up and overtake the C55 at higher speeds, but at the beginning, the C55 likely could be ahead at 60mph and beyond. This applies to rolling starts at highway speeds too. The E9x M3 is all about being in the proper gear and being high in the rpm range to get that maximum push you back in the seat feel for maximum acceleration, whereas AMG cars like the C55 and C63 have abundant torque lower down in the rpm range, which is more easily accessible. Different power delivery, and different type of fun. I personally love the E90 M3. If I didn't love my C55 so much as a "do everything" type of car that keeps me looking good at lapping days, I would have gotten a E90 M3 already with M-DCT and adaptive dampers (the two things which I wish the C63 has). |
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576937)
Thats what I am afraid of.
Here's launch control. Yes the US version gets this launch control enabled, no warrany concerns and you can use it as many times as you want. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJqrtHSd0y0 The 1-2 shift is rough because the car is still trying to get traction and chirps into 2nd gear. DCT slams into gears at full throttle in S6 mode, it's pretty violent. The rest of the shifts are as you would expect, listen closely you can hear the engine back on the throttle and putting down power before the needle can get down to the RPM it's supposed to be at. |
^ No doubt BMW’s DCT in S6 mode is a remarkable fete of engineering prowess.
Nice brake check at 7:35! |
Originally Posted by splinter
(Post 4576995)
^ No doubt BMW’s DCT in S6 mode is a remarkable fete of engineering prowess.
Nice brake check at 7:35! |
Forget all this M3 talk. Put the DCT in the 1M and I will get in line! :) Now, that's something I would like, 360 ft-lbs at 1700 with overboost! True M suspension, smaller package, 150 lbs lighter. Ugly as my dog's butt, but hey what the heck.
|
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
(Post 4576670)
Except Chappy he's ditching the C55 and going to the dark side.............Jerry of EC did the same to us about a year ago with his M5............
Defectors should not be allowed back!!!:naughty: |
I too like the torque at take off in the C55.
At higher speed other fast cars can probably take me. At really high speeds it can change again... It reminds me of last summer at Autobahn when I raced a Porche Carrera S Cab with 385 hp: (We´re talking about speeds above 125 mph, up to 160 approx.) When I was in the front, he couldn´t really catch up. When he was in front I could catch him up! That shows, in my eyes, that the huge high compression high revving V8 is a real Autobahnkiller AT REALLY HIGH SPEEDS! His smaller pancake-engine couldn´t match the big raceinspired AMG M113 at those awesome speeds... Torque is king! :naughty: I was both impressed and surprised over the fact but it all makes sense at the bottom line. Unfortunately I can´t experience that too often since I don´t live in Germany, I can´t utilize that upper hand. //P. |
[QUOTE=55fanatic;4576758]we all come back at some point... I learned my lesson, should have bought an E55 so many years ago and skipped the M3, although it was somewhat fun...
Welcome back, at least temporarily......... Not that I'm telling you anything you don't know but find yourself a 06 E55 and mod it..........a virtual torque monster or a C63 with the P30 or P31........... |
Originally Posted by AsianML
(Post 4576324)
Life is good! Glad to see you're still in the car scene. I'm in my sophomore year of college now! Time flies huh.
What have you been up to? |
Originally Posted by SpencerAMG
(Post 4576340)
I have an '09 E90 M3 and love it. Definitly a better car than the C55, no offense to anyone here, C55 is sweet, but the E9X M3 takes it any day, C63 is another story.
|
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
(Post 4576390)
[/U][/I][/B]
Takes it any day in what regard?? Be specific, or as my kids say, Pacific?? From AsianML: C55 AMG 363hp/376lb-ft @ 4000rpm 3,605lbs 9.93lbs/hp Fastest stock time on dragtimes: 13.2s @ 107.3mph E92 M3 414hp/296lb-ft tq 3,704lbs 8.9lbs/hp Fastest stock time on dragtimes: 12.510s @ 114.8mph Once again, it takes a little brains and skill to optimize the M. The AMG, just make sure it hooks up, and mash it! |
[QUOTE=Newzchspy;4577156]
Originally Posted by 55fanatic
(Post 4576758)
we all come back at some point... I learned my lesson, should have bought an E55 so many years ago and skipped the M3, although it was somewhat fun...
Welcome back, at least temporarily......... Not that I'm telling you anything you don't know but find yourself a 06 E55 and mod it..........a virtual torque monster or a C63 with the P30 or P31........... |
Originally Posted by SilverBulletAMG
(Post 4576409)
Dump the 55 and contact HPF. You won't be missing anything. Promise!:naughty:
|
Originally Posted by pointman
(Post 4576480)
You think so? I always thought the e92 was more aggressive. Even though I prefer the e90.
|
Originally Posted by callmiro
(Post 4576521)
|
Originally Posted by Chappy
(Post 4576555)
Like old times on this thread....welcome back, scoop!
|
Originally Posted by michael kuzni
(Post 4576568)
this is wayyyy before my time.lol
|
Originally Posted by reflex92
(Post 4576721)
I just beat an E90 M3 the other day....nice car but the M3's don't compare to the AMG's IMO
|
Originally Posted by 55fanatic
(Post 4576753)
DAMN right I did... Im a benz guy, lack of torque was really killing me... Car looked fantastic, especially in the trim it was in before I sold it... but unless you rev the nuts off the car, it didnt move for ****!
It was the shortest time I have owned a car ever!!! I will say 1 thing though, I bought the car for 25,500 and sold it for 23k with its goodies... I have never bought and sold a car with such a close margin... Going back to an AMG car as soon as I get my business off the ground... Good to hear from you, Pete! |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4577335)
Yeah, well that was just an E46. Nice car for it's time but my how times have changed....
Good to hear from you, Pete! |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4577295)
Wow, awesome website. Thanks for pointing it out. Seeing alot for the E46 as compared to teh E9x tho....
Also, there is bolt-on tuning potential with the e9x platform. Full exhaust, tune, pulley and filter can net substantial gains. |
Originally Posted by 55fanatic
(Post 4577341)
How you been bud?
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4576984)
Check out 4:57 of this video. Car drops from 7th to 5th. Keep in mind this is a slow shift because it's droping 2 gears so you lose the dual clutch advantage. Still ultra fast. Don't blink.
Here's launch control. Yes the US version gets this launch control enabled, no warrany concerns and you can use it as many times as you want. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJqrtHSd0y0 The 1-2 shift is rough because the car is still trying to get traction and chirps into 2nd gear. DCT slams into gears at full throttle in S6 mode, it's pretty violent. The rest of the shifts are as you would expect, listen closely you can hear the engine back on the throttle and putting down power before the needle can get down to the RPM it's supposed to be at. |
I still have my C55, yet I have my E90 M3 too :D love it!
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4577285)
...well, I think 1/4 mile for one thing:
From AsianML: C55 AMG 363hp/376lb-ft @ 4000rpm 3,605lbs 9.93lbs/hp Fastest stock time on dragtimes: 13.2s @ 107.3mph E92 M3 414hp/296lb-ft tq 3,704lbs 8.9lbs/hp Fastest stock time on dragtimes: 12.510s @ 114.8mph Once again, it takes a little brains and skill to optimize the M. The AMG, just make sure it hooks up, and mash it! Like listed above, a better/fairer comparison would be the C63 to the E9X and the C55 to the E46 |
I'd say do it! E90 M3 Sedan has beautiful lines!
|
Originally Posted by advans
(Post 4578643)
I still have my C55, yet I have my E90 M3 too :D love it!
Though, I think I would prefer the C55 and E92 M! :naughty: |
Originally Posted by MercedesFTW
(Post 4578967)
Damn:bow:
Though, I think I would prefer the C55 and E92 M! :naughty: |
SCOOP??? Where the hell have you been? Hope all is well with you! Eric told me you were back! Woot! :y
Stay with the Benz. :D Am I too late? |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4577318)
tell me that's not real......
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1786/caught-testing-bmw-m3-pickup/ |
Originally Posted by JKETCH
(Post 4581735)
SCOOP??? Where the hell have you been? Hope all is well with you! Eric told me you were back! Woot! :y
Stay with the Benz. :D Am I too late? Well, this is all a moot point now. I returned the M3 on Saturday. I'm crushed. Like I said, I had a 5-day trial period, and I made an appointment with BMW of San Diego on Fri afternoon. I paid them $139 to give the car a top-to-bottom inspection and also asked for an experienced driver to take it out for a spin. See, what I noticed was when the gears engaged, especially from 1st to 2nd, I could hear a could hear/feel a slight "clunk", very very small, but still. Initially the service tech said that was probably normal, being a hardcore gearbox and all. They came back and said the tranny was making a slight irregular sound when in neutral, and it needed to be investigated. They said a minimum of 5 days in the shop to troubleshoot, and didn't know if the problem was minor or major at that point. I began to weep (jk). They noted that it was covered under factory warranty, so it would be no cost to me. I went home, called some BMW buddies, and slept on it. I just didn't want to get into major warranty work right from the get-go, so I returned it the next day. I told the guy at CarMax about what BMW found, and he said that they would have to get it checked out by them. It was back on thier website for sale the next day!! Jerks.:bs: Oh well, the way I look at it is I got to rent a b1tchin M3 for a week for $139. If I decide to buy a new one, at least I had some time behind the wheel, since being able to test drive a new M3 is forbidden around here. Back on the market I guess. Any suggestions? |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4584211)
Hey, Jen! Good to hear from you!
Well, this is all a moot point now. I returned the M3 on Saturday. I'm crushed. Like I said, I had a 5-day trial period, and I made an appointment with BMW of San Diego on Fri afternoon. I paid them $139 to give the car a top-to-bottom inspection and also asked for an experienced driver to take it out for a spin. See, what I noticed was when the gears engaged, especially from 1st to 2nd, I could hear a could hear/feel a slight "clunk", very very small, but still. Initially the service tech said that was probably normal, being a hardcore gearbox and all. They came back and said the tranny was making a slight irregular sound when in neutral, and it needed to be investigated. They said a minimum of 5 days in the shop to troubleshoot, and didn't know if the problem was minor or major at that point. I began to weep (jk). They noted that it was covered under factory warranty, so it would be no cost to me. I went home, called some BMW buddies, and slept on it. I just didn't want to get into major warranty work right from the get-go, so I returned it the next day. I told the guy at CarMax about what BMW found, and he said that they would have to get it checked out by them. It was back on thier website for sale the next day!! Jerks.:bs: Oh well, the way I look at it is I got to rent a b1tchin M3 for a week for $139. If I decide to buy a new one, at least I had some time behind the wheel, since being able to test drive a new M3 is forbidden around here. Back on the market I guess. Any suggestions? Of course your issue could be entirely different, but the annoying jerky final drive is one reason I gave it up. |
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4584211)
Hey, Jen! Good to hear from you!
Well, this is all a moot point now. I returned the M3 on Saturday. I'm crushed. Like I said, I had a 5-day trial period, and I made an appointment with BMW of San Diego on Fri afternoon. I paid them $139 to give the car a top-to-bottom inspection and also asked for an experienced driver to take it out for a spin. See, what I noticed was when the gears engaged, especially from 1st to 2nd, I could hear a could hear/feel a slight "clunk", very very small, but still. Initially the service tech said that was probably normal, being a hardcore gearbox and all. They came back and said the tranny was making a slight irregular sound when in neutral, and it needed to be investigated. They said a minimum of 5 days in the shop to troubleshoot, and didn't know if the problem was minor or major at that point. I began to weep (jk). They noted that it was covered under factory warranty, so it would be no cost to me. I went home, called some BMW buddies, and slept on it. I just didn't want to get into major warranty work right from the get-go, so I returned it the next day. I told the guy at CarMax about what BMW found, and he said that they would have to get it checked out by them. It was back on thier website for sale the next day!! Jerks.:bs: Oh well, the way I look at it is I got to rent a b1tchin M3 for a week for $139. If I decide to buy a new one, at least I had some time behind the wheel, since being able to test drive a new M3 is forbidden around here. Back on the market I guess. Any suggestions? |
Scoop that suuuucks!
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4584211)
Back on the market I guess. Any suggestions?
|
Buy a E55 AMG nothing else compares :)
|
Originally Posted by e1000
(Post 4584509)
Scoop that suuuucks!
A buddy of mine at work here is going to check out a '10 M3 w/ DCT and 10K miles tonight, $58K. Piss me off if he gets it...... |
Originally Posted by reflex92
(Post 4584660)
Buy a E55 AMG nothing else compares :)
|
Originally Posted by Scoop55
(Post 4585035)
I know, dood, it totally blows. I thought for sure after I decided to return it, the wife would be all over checking out a new S4 again, and she said, meh...I'm not so interested in that car anymore(!!) (chicks, pfft).
A buddy of mine at work here is going to check out a '10 M3 w/ DCT and 10K miles tonight, $58K. Piss me off if he gets it...... |
Get an S65!
|
Originally Posted by AsianML
(Post 4585070)
Get an S65!
|
Porsche. Turbo.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands