hmmm..looks like C55 pistons aren't too tough after all.
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
hmmm..looks like C55 pistons aren't too tough after all.
After installing a 2.5" pulley on the kleeman setup and beating the living hell out of the car for a week ( litterally about 50 wot runs to 100+mph in one week ) the car began misfiring. Here are the compression results:
1 = 170
2 = 170
3 = 173
4 = 175
5 = 165
6 = 145
7 = 171
8 = 97
cyl 6 seems weak ( engine has 105k miles and ran nitrous before the supercharger ). Cyl 8 is toast however. Car ran fine though even after the damage. It's always number 8 isn't it.
Keep in mind, AF ratio was high 10's and timing was a ridiculously low 7-9* with 0* of timing retard due to knock up until 3rd gear where it would sometimes retard 1-2* or so in small bursts which isn't bad at all. I guess the engine was just tired.
1 = 170
2 = 170
3 = 173
4 = 175
5 = 165
6 = 145
7 = 171
8 = 97
cyl 6 seems weak ( engine has 105k miles and ran nitrous before the supercharger ). Cyl 8 is toast however. Car ran fine though even after the damage. It's always number 8 isn't it.
Keep in mind, AF ratio was high 10's and timing was a ridiculously low 7-9* with 0* of timing retard due to knock up until 3rd gear where it would sometimes retard 1-2* or so in small bursts which isn't bad at all. I guess the engine was just tired.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
That's a bit like saying that if you hit your partner with a baseball bat a few times you can see how weak they are.
These engines are not designed for nitrous or for racing style performance 24x7. At least not without oxygen sensor deletion, straight through exhaust, high flow cat, and exhaust headers.
These engines are not designed for nitrous or for racing style performance 24x7. At least not without oxygen sensor deletion, straight through exhaust, high flow cat, and exhaust headers.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
That's a bit like saying that if you hit your partner with a baseball bat a few times you can see how weak they are.
These engines are not designed for nitrous or for racing style performance 24x7. At least not without oxygen sensor deletion, straight through exhaust, high flow cat, and exhaust headers.
These engines are not designed for nitrous or for racing style performance 24x7. At least not without oxygen sensor deletion, straight through exhaust, high flow cat, and exhaust headers.
He has headers, straight dual exhaust with no cats. I also tried to play it as safe as possible and it still blew...ouch.
The Kleemann Eaton currently has a 2.5" pulley ( stock is 2.8"" ).
E55 Pistons and rods.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Wow. That's crazy. I guess I should leave mine alone and be happy with it.
Are the heads different on the E55 or just the rods and pistons? It might be a good idea to go with forged pistons, especially if the car is still going to be driven that hard.
Are the heads different on the E55 or just the rods and pistons? It might be a good idea to go with forged pistons, especially if the car is still going to be driven that hard.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bella Vista, AR
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
05 C55 AMG
Uh running a 10 A/F...why the heck would you do that? Too rich is not good. Sounds like you cracked a ring landing, i guess we will find out. In the future run in the mid 12s A/F.
If the timing was being retarded 1-2 degrees, 20%, that means you were getting a significant amount of knock. I don't know this ECU specifically but most of them use a basic algorithm. Example, 1-3 counts of knock = keep advancing timing, 4-6 counts of knock = keep timing where it is, 7+ counts of knock = start retarding.
You never hit full load in 1st and 2nd gear which is why you didn't see these signs until 3rd gear.
Are you tuning this on the fly? What software are you using?
If the timing was being retarded 1-2 degrees, 20%, that means you were getting a significant amount of knock. I don't know this ECU specifically but most of them use a basic algorithm. Example, 1-3 counts of knock = keep advancing timing, 4-6 counts of knock = keep timing where it is, 7+ counts of knock = start retarding.
You never hit full load in 1st and 2nd gear which is why you didn't see these signs until 3rd gear.
Are you tuning this on the fly? What software are you using?
Last edited by Quickvr4; 10-27-2012 at 10:29 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bella Vista, AR
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
05 C55 AMG
Too little timing is not good either as your EGTs will go through the roof.
What were your readings for:
EGTs
IDCs
Is cylinder 8 furthest from the feed on the rail?
Do you have a datalog that you can show us?
I really think that methanol is a must when running boost on these N/A engines and especially if you are going to beat the crap out of it and not use race gas.
What were your readings for:
EGTs
IDCs
Is cylinder 8 furthest from the feed on the rail?
Do you have a datalog that you can show us?
I really think that methanol is a must when running boost on these N/A engines and especially if you are going to beat the crap out of it and not use race gas.
Last edited by Quickvr4; 10-27-2012 at 10:35 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Too little timing is not good either as your EGTs will go through the roof.
What were your readings for:
EGTs
IDCs
Is cylinder 8 furthest from the feed on the rail?
Do you have a datalog that you can show us?
I really think that methanol is a must when running boost on these N/A engines and especially if you are going to beat the crap out of it and not use race gas.
What were your readings for:
EGTs
IDCs
Is cylinder 8 furthest from the feed on the rail?
Do you have a datalog that you can show us?
I really think that methanol is a must when running boost on these N/A engines and especially if you are going to beat the crap out of it and not use race gas.
High EGT's will kill in loooong pulls. IDC was below 80%.
Uh running a 10 A/F...why the heck would you do that? Too rich is not good. Sounds like you cracked a ring landing, i guess we will find out. In the future run in the mid 12s A/F.
If the timing was being retarded 1-2 degrees, 20%, that means you were getting a significant amount of knock. I don't know this ECU specifically but most of them use a basic algorithm. Example, 1-3 counts of knock = keep advancing timing, 4-6 counts of knock = keep timing where it is, 7+ counts of knock = start retarding.
You never hit full load in 1st and 2nd gear which is why you didn't see these signs until 3rd gear.
Are you tuning this on the fly? What software are you using?
If the timing was being retarded 1-2 degrees, 20%, that means you were getting a significant amount of knock. I don't know this ECU specifically but most of them use a basic algorithm. Example, 1-3 counts of knock = keep advancing timing, 4-6 counts of knock = keep timing where it is, 7+ counts of knock = start retarding.
You never hit full load in 1st and 2nd gear which is why you didn't see these signs until 3rd gear.
Are you tuning this on the fly? What software are you using?
Bosch ECU's are ULTRA sensitive and can retard well over 10* of timing if they have to. Even bone stock most of these vehicles can see 3-4* of timing retard easily. My previous GTI 1.8T ( similar bosch ECU ) ran with 5-6* of timing retard constantly in every gear and in 40K miles never blew anything with over 400whp.
Granted, seeing 0* across the board will be safer no doubt, but when the C55 broke it was in a short 2nd gear burst with 0* of retardation. Again, this is on a 105K mile engine that saw lots of nitrous before seeing boost....maybe it was just time.
Keep in mind, the compression will be dropped from 11.1 to 9.0.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
He's had no problems with the bigger injectors? Cory had told me something about a spot in the RPM range that wouldn't cooperate or something like that, which is why they now use the secondary fuel pump with stock injectors setup my kit uses.
Are you going to be doing the pistons yourself?
Are you going to be doing the pistons yourself?
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
He's had no problems with the bigger injectors? Cory had told me something about a spot in the RPM range that wouldn't cooperate or something like that, which is why they now use the secondary fuel pump with stock injectors setup my kit uses.
Are you going to be doing the pistons yourself?
Are you going to be doing the pistons yourself?
Yes, I'll likely be doing the piston install.
![mercy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/mecry.gif)
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Hmm, that's interesting. You might want to change that fuel system, might help the overall performance.
Any chance of maybe a how to how replacing the pistons and rods? Are you leaving the engine in the car or taking it out?
Any chance of maybe a how to how replacing the pistons and rods? Are you leaving the engine in the car or taking it out?
#17
Super Member
Wasn't Blackbenzz runing a stock bottom end in his 700+rwhp monster CLK? Makes me wonder if it was the nitrous...
Just out of curiousity, did you check the compresion when your friend was having the issues when he was still N/A?
Last edited by dre5373; 10-28-2012 at 02:16 PM.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
With those lower timing i pray you don't have a melted piston or/and melted cylinder wall(do you know also what was AIT?) , the heads are little different the 55K has heads with higher volume, so with 55K pistons and rods you will have higher then 9:1 compression ratio, we don't how much higher cause there is no data available about heads volumes but i think below 10-9.5.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Never took compression before on this car.
With those lower timing i pray you don't have a melted piston or/and melted cylinder wall(do you know also what was AIT?) , the heads are little different the 55K has heads with higher volume, so with 55K pistons and rods you will have higher then 9:1 compression ratio, we don't how much higher cause there is no data available about heads volumes but i think below 10-9.5.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
7-9* of timing, while low, isn't exactly meltdown low and I never did any high speed pulls ( never went over 115mph ) so I doubt it was a big deal. Plus, the car still has 90+psi of compression and both plugs were fine when removed which means the damage shouldn't be THAT bad. Guess I'll find out.
after all it's time for 55k piston and rods.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bella Vista, AR
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
05 C55 AMG
GT-ER, I have not tuned a car in a long time, 6-7 years. We used to tune a lot of mid 90's japanese turbo cars and aim for 12:0-12:3 A/Fs and maybe closer to redline high 11s. Is this rich tune due to the engine being N/A? I am not sure how that will affect it.
I am really curious to see what this piston looks like.
Did you do a leak down test? Maybe the issue is in the cylinder head...? Are these heads aluminium?
I am really curious to see what this piston looks like.
Did you do a leak down test? Maybe the issue is in the cylinder head...? Are these heads aluminium?
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
GT-ER, I have not tuned a car in a long time, 6-7 years. We used to tune a lot of mid 90's japanese turbo cars and aim for 12:0-12:3 A/Fs and maybe closer to redline high 11s. Is this rich tune due to the engine being N/A? I am not sure how that will affect it.
I am really curious to see what this piston looks like.
Did you do a leak down test? Maybe the issue is in the cylinder head...? Are these heads aluminium?
I am really curious to see what this piston looks like.
Did you do a leak down test? Maybe the issue is in the cylinder head...? Are these heads aluminium?
I didn't do a leakdown test since I figured I may as well go the extra mile regardless since removal of the cylinderhead is already complicated enough. May as well remove both along with the oil pan and do the whole thing. Even if it turns out to be a valve issue I'll still build a stronger engine.
They are made of aluminum.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Where were you reading your timing readings from? I just checked mine with a hand held universal scanner that shows live data, and it shows timing advance. I'm not an expert on what this should be yet though. Normally driving around it was -25* or so and under WO it was -7* the first time and -8* the second time. The MAP sensor was showing around 9 inches at idle which is about 4.4psi and at WOT it was around 25 inches which is about 12psi. Is that right? It can't be reading boost because there's no way there's boost at idle!