C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

2003 CLK500 vs 2003 C32

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-02-2002, 10:02 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 CLK500 vs 2003 C32

Anybody got any clues how about how close performance wise the 2003 CLK500 would be to the 2003 C32 ? In Canada these cars are going to be very close in price when you load them up.
Old 06-02-2002, 10:10 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
the C32 should come out on top. performance wise that is
Old 06-02-2002, 10:35 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Accord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
The C32 is without a doubt much faster, the CLK500 will have the standard 5 Liter engine with 302 hp. There will be no performance differences between a MY2002 and a MY2003 C32 AMG.

Moving this to the C32 forum.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2003 CLK500 vs 2003 C32



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.