Eibach vs HR vs vogtland
#29
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C36 AMG, E46 M3 Coupe
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(
guys are the H&R springs stiffer than the stock, or they just drop height, i am looking for stiff springs for my 36 AMG, and i really dont't know what to go for. and which of the 2 sag, was it H&R or Eibach??? which will offer stiffer ride? i dont need that much of a drop.
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Connecticut, New Haven
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
95' AMG SeeThreeSix
Im also interested, moreso in the Eibachs. I've got a set in the garage for the summer but am hesitant to go through putting them in before I hear a bit of input on drop, ride quality, stiffness ect. I'll try to dig up some info on them Jay.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 C36 AMG
i've got some H&R's and billy sports that are going on my C36 this weekend. i'll let you guys know how things go and how they feel....
FWIW, i have nothing but good experiences with H&R's on a lot of other cars i have owned, which is why i went that route with the 36......it was basically between the 3 that we are talking about now; H&R, Eibach and Vogtland.
FWIW, i have nothing but good experiences with H&R's on a lot of other cars i have owned, which is why i went that route with the 36......it was basically between the 3 that we are talking about now; H&R, Eibach and Vogtland.
#33
Super Member
vicious 43 Where did you get the voght suspension kit,wat does it consist of? How much? Looks AWESOME!
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 C36 AMG
i've got some H&R's and billy sports that are going on my C36 this weekend. i'll let you guys know how things go and how they feel....
FWIW, i have nothing but good experiences with H&R's on a lot of other cars i have owned, which is why i went that route with the 36......it was basically between the 3 that we are talking about now; H&R, Eibach and Vogtland.
FWIW, i have nothing but good experiences with H&R's on a lot of other cars i have owned, which is why i went that route with the 36......it was basically between the 3 that we are talking about now; H&R, Eibach and Vogtland.
#35
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'98 AMG C43 / '70 Cougar
Also recently I changed from #2 to #4 pads f/r it was too low for me...raised it about 9mm it feels much better now I like driving the c43 aggresive
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(
Need to ask for a favor:
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 36; would u be kind enough to measure the coil thickness for the fronts and rears plz.
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 43; would u be kind enough to do same as above.
Ben, can you do same with the Eibach set u have at home
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 36; would u be kind enough to measure the coil thickness for the fronts and rears plz.
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 43; would u be kind enough to do same as above.
Ben, can you do same with the Eibach set u have at home
#37
Super Member
hey, just following up on why experience installing my H&R's this weekend. first of all, i got the exact look i was going for. slight rake and not too too slammed. the one thing i was surprised about was how bouncy the ride was right after the install. i know that it takes time for everyhting to settle and for the springs and shocks to get a little "broken in", but the rear of the car seemd overly bouncy. not bouncy like i was on cut springs and crappy shocks, just bouncy due to the stiffness of the new parts. anyone have any idea as far as how long the "break-in" period is or how long it takes for for the car to fully settle? i will post some pics when i get a chance to take some good ones (currently pouring rain here in the beautiful pacific northwest)
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Connecticut, New Haven
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
95' AMG SeeThreeSix
Need to ask for a favor:
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 36; would u be kind enough to measure the coil thickness for the fronts and rears plz.
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 43; would u be kind enough to do same as above.
Ben, can you do same with the Eibach set u have at home
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 36; would u be kind enough to measure the coil thickness for the fronts and rears plz.
Any of you with a set of H&R for the 43; would u be kind enough to do same as above.
Ben, can you do same with the Eibach set u have at home
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(
Not a problem Jay, I'm just not sure what you mean by coil thickness. Should I just take a caliper measurement to one of the coils, or do you mean the diameter of the whole coil itself? Cant wait till my new tires come in and I get the eibachs in, I'll be ballin for the summer
.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
thats exactly it, measure one of the coils with a caliper. My AMG36 and prolly urs too has a 15mm coil thickness on the fronts. The 43 has a 16mm one. I know its not the only factor in calculating the spring stiffness but since all are very close in design it should give an idea.
The extra 1mm of the 43 over those of the 36 have a gr8 effect making the 43 a really flat car in the turns.
Last edited by jayrasheed; 04-01-2010 at 01:50 PM.
#41
Super Member
Vicious 43 side profile pic with the pad change
Car looks awesome once again!!!!!!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 C36 AMG
yeah man, the H&R's i got are just too stiff. i think i am either going to go with the vogtland's or the eibachs, depending on prices and drops. i love the look with the H&Rs that are on there right now, but it rides like sh-t.....especially in the rear.
any experiences comparing vogtland and eibach springs specifically would be killer.
any experiences comparing vogtland and eibach springs specifically would be killer.
#43
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On a rock
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
92 AMG 190E EVO2DTM, 240T Turbo Benz, 84 AMG 190E, 560SEC-TT, 95 C36 & a BHG 98 C230
I just installed the Bilstien Sports on my C36 with the stock springs. The car handles very well compared to my SCCA 924S. I would like to change the springs and get just 1/2" Lower. The roads suck here so cant go too low. any suggestion? I should have looked at the spring pads when I was changing the shocks!
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Connecticut, New Haven
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
95' AMG SeeThreeSix
yes Ben,
thats exactly it, measure one of the coils with a caliper. My AMG36 and prolly urs too has a 15mm coil thickness on the fronts. The 43 has a 16mm one. I know its not the only factor in calculating the spring stiffness but since all are very close in design it should give an idea.
The extra 1mm of the 43 over those of the 36 have a gr8 effect making the 43 a really flat car in the turns.
thats exactly it, measure one of the coils with a caliper. My AMG36 and prolly urs too has a 15mm coil thickness on the fronts. The 43 has a 16mm one. I know its not the only factor in calculating the spring stiffness but since all are very close in design it should give an idea.
The extra 1mm of the 43 over those of the 36 have a gr8 effect making the 43 a really flat car in the turns.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(
ok measure the rear one too for me plz.
thou the 43 and 36 showed no difference on the rear springs.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(
Guys can any confirm if the H&R sport kit offered for the 43 are stiffer than those offered for the 36 1995.
I was on the phone with H&R and the refused to disclose any info regarding stiffness.
They just said the sport kit will be slightly stiffer than stock. That being said, i know that the 43 is stiffer from factory than the 36 so can we assume that same will be true for the H&R, ie: 43 kit stiffer than 36 kit?
I was on the phone with H&R and the refused to disclose any info regarding stiffness.
They just said the sport kit will be slightly stiffer than stock. That being said, i know that the 43 is stiffer from factory than the 36 so can we assume that same will be true for the H&R, ie: 43 kit stiffer than 36 kit?
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 C 36 AMG; 1992 W124 300E (M103 Ex Mosselman TT KIT) was 320hp @10psi now stock :(