Why Does Mercedes Me Suck So Bad?
Last edited by Susan Rich; Dec 20, 2018 at 12:28 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

There were so many complaints about remote start issues with the Mercedes Me App, I'd like to think this will be a fix for future models. Too bad for us though...
My experience: My 2016 C450 works every time through the Mercedes Me app. There has been a couple times that the app said my remote start did not work, but the car was running. It starts in under two minutes and usually less than a minute. Seems the service has gotten a little better than 2 years ago.




As a case in point, look what happened when they re-wrote the AMG Private Forum software ... it went from being a fairly normal and quite usable forum site to something that was actually "off the air" for an extended period and, to this day, still lacks some of the most basic features that any forum has ... such as "only show me things I've not read" and "mark all read". The Track Pace app took years to get to it's current level of functionality ... and it's still pretty useless. Why didn't they just go to Harry (of Harry's Laptimer) and buy his expertise and code (he's even located in Germany).
The newer COMAND UI, like many UIs these days, is also degrading and, in some cases, is just plain dangerous. When one of our AMGs was in for a scheduled service, I had a loaner with MBUX. As just one example, I tried to set the airflow while driving and literally couldn't do it safely without pulling over. With NTG 4 and 5 versions, when you press the button to set the airflow vents (window, passenger, footwell and/or combinations), you get a reasonably sized, 2 color pop-up that is easy to decipher "at a glance" and clearly shows which vents are activated, allowing you to cycle through all the options slowly enough that you can glance back at the road in between button pushes. The MBUX version presents a multi-colored, shaded list that is has small graphics and is _very_ difficult to decipher (i.e., see which vents are activated) quickly _and_ the damned thing disappears so quickly that you need to focus your attention on that list all the time you're making your setting selection -- assuming you can even see which item is selected (or else the list disappears before you're done).
When changing a climate-control setting becomes a distraction, things are pretty bad. Of course, the same thing has been said over and over for touch-screen controls and, until recently, Mercedes always claimed that they'd "never make a touch-screen interface," presumably because they knew it wouldn't be as safe. Touch-screen controls for things you need to do while driving are _never_ going to be as safe as "no look required" tactile controls (physical buttons, switches and dials). These days, it seems that designers are doing things "because they can" and "oooo, beceause that's neat technology" ... rather than "because it makes things easier/faster/intuitive to do" -- thus the degradation of UIs in cars, appliances, electronic devices, etc.
Shame on you, Mercedes, for mindlessly following UI suit and creating UIs that are driver distracting and less safe! Shame on you, Mercedes, for not either building or hiring software teams that can create (or even re-use/adapt) well-designed, stable, feature-rich and easy to use web and application-level software in a timely manner. I can't imagine how frustrating it's going to be to have to endure one of your vehicles that employs AI-based software that thinks it's smarter than the user ... count me out unless you give me a "lobotomy button (for the car's "intelligence," in case there was any doubt)." <end of rant>






