horsepower upgrades
How simple is it to increase the horsepower of my stock 2017 C 43 to match the numbers of the 2019 C43
|
Originally Posted by FirstC43
(Post 7537090)
How simple is it to increase the horsepower of my stock 2017 C 43 to match the numbers of the 2019 C43
|
Originally Posted by FirstC43
(Post 7537090)
How simple is it to increase the horsepower of my stock 2017 C 43 to match the numbers of the 2019 C43
It's easy to boost your stock 2017 '43 to power levels slightly higher than the 2019 with any of the mild piggybacks out there. The Dinan sport is the cheapest, it'll get you to about 400 crank hp. The JB1 is only a little bit more expensive and it'll get you quite a bit more hp than a stock 2019 is rated for. The Racechip is the most expensive and slots higher than the Dinan but less than the JB1. Most of these piggybacks are very simple installations that are basically plug and play. |
Anyone try the Performmaster Tunning kit?
|
Nah, You're better off getting a JB1 or JB4 tune, You'll get wayyy more power than 2019 C43
|
I agree i have vr tuned box and the HP increase is very noticeable
|
Originally Posted by Mr. J
(Post 7537171)
It's easy to boost your stock 2017 '43 to power levels slightly higher than the 2019 with any of the mild piggybacks out there. The Dinan sport is the cheapest, it'll get you to about 400 crank hp. The JB1 is only a little bit more expensive and it'll get you quite a bit more hp than a stock 2019 is rated for. The Racechip is the most expensive and slots higher than the Dinan but less than the JB1. Most of these piggybacks are very simple installations that are basically plug and play.
Why doesnt MB just produce a C43 with the same HP as that with a tune? Thanks. |
The question is...does anyone yet have software developed for the New C43??? |
Originally Posted by AMG C43 3LV6
(Post 7537236)
Does tuning damage the car long term?
Why doesnt MB just produce a C43 with the same HP as that with a tune? Thanks.
Originally Posted by Chaznik
(Post 7537239)
The question is...does anyone yet have software developed for the New C43??? |
Originally Posted by NYCSoiL
(Post 7537248)
It is the same as 16-18
|
[QUOTE=NYCSoiL;7537248]I'd imagine yes, but nobody know how bad and how fast as the platform is still new.
I doubt boosting the turbos 1.5psi each- (which is what you get from JB1 on map 2) would damage the turbos anymore than usual. Since turbos started becoming popular in the mid to late 80's, performance enthusiasts have been boosting them 5-8 psi or more over stock- BMW even had a feature a few years back called "overboost" which allowed the turbo to provide boost over max stock numbers for a brief period. In theory I am sure the engineers compensated by allowing quite a bit more than the 6 psi max each turbo see's stock and remember full boost is only under wide open throttle- which most only do briefly, unless your tracking it. |
Any of those piggybacks invalidate your warranty?
|
Excuse the ignorance, but what changes were made to the engine for the 19 c43? My thinking was MB just leaned out the AFRs on the c450/c43 (16-18) and thus increased the power.
Update: Just checked and saw the 19 gets a bigger turbo charger? That's great, anyone know what the flow rate is? What is the flow rate of the c450/c43 (16-18)? |
Originally Posted by CFG
(Post 7537531)
If you are in the U.S., absent a causal connection, Magnusson Moss says no. What do you mean by casual connection? |
Originally Posted by CFG
(Post 7537552)
“Causal connection” means the manufacturer can’t rightfully disaffirm the warranty unless it (burden of persuasion) can show the piggyback caused the damages sought to be repaired under warranty. Simply using a piggy is not sufficient legal ground to reject a warrant claim. As for a casual connection, Sven and da boys say, “Ya, sure, you betcha!” ;) Can mb tell if you used a piggyback? |
Originally Posted by osidepunker
(Post 7537530)
Any of those piggybacks invalidate your warranty?
Now that does not mean that if you have a suspension component fail or or your window motor dies, or whatever else, that it won't be covered, as those parts don't necessarily have any relation to the tune. It's just not as black and white as saying "tune = warranty voided." Last note for the new people in this thread....if you enjoy being confused and reading muddled legalese, CFG is your best friend. Otherwise, don't feed the troll. :y (you'll see why when he responds to this) |
Originally Posted by osidepunker
(Post 7537555)
Can mb tell if you used a piggyback?
|
Originally Posted by RichardCranium3
(Post 7537562)
100%, unequivocally yes
|
I laugh every time I see someone cite MM as a defense for a warranty claim denial. All the dealer has to do is refuse to do the work, and then what will you do? Spend $50k in legal fees fighting them. And given MB has a legal team bigger than OJ's your chances if winning are slim to none. I would say none if you used any type or tune or piggyback and the issue is engine or driveline related in any way. Although you will get laughed at for throwing $50k into the wind.
I'd like for someone to show me just one case of a consumer suing an auto manf. under MM and winning. Just one. |
Originally Posted by CFG
(Post 7537641)
Oh, wait, here is one: https://jalopnik.com/dont-let-the-ca...-wh-1736064825 and, the guy recovered attirney’s fees AND costs as provided in the act.... |
Originally Posted by CFG
(Post 7537641)
Oh, wait, here is one: https://jalopnik.com/dont-let-the-ca...-wh-1736064825 and, the guy recovered attirney’s fees AND costs as provided in the act.... https://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/28/...-car-warranty/ "In such cases where the vehicle was under warranty, claims were denied and engine warranties were voided; the carmaker simply confirmed that head gasket failure was indeed due to installation of the power chips. The carmaker was (again) well within its right to deny claims and void engine warranties." |
I learn and trust everything I know from the internet. Am I doing it wrong?
|
You can write dissertations as long as as often as you like, but put any kind of tune on your car, try to make a warranty claim related to the engine or driveline and see what happens.
|
Originally Posted by CFG
(Post 7537773)
You can cast as much doubt as you want, or raise as many ad hominems as you desire, but it changes nothing: if there is an arbitrary or wrongful denial, there is a meaningful remedy, including attorneys fees and costs. People have a right to sue for negligence, but that merely deters it, and does not stop it. Peple have a right to sue for defective products, yet manufacturers continue to.... You miss the point, whether by design or neglect. Go ahead and tune your vehicle and when you request warranty service for a fouled fuel injector I will be laughing. |
HAHAHA I forgot why I dislike forums. Thanks for reminding me fellas :rolf:
I agree with Clint though. If I put a tune on, pop a motor, and get denied warranty claim, I would come out the pocket, swap the motor and move on with my life. I doubt I would win and it wouldn't be worth trying. But if I thought there was no way MB could detect the tune I might consider it... But really though, the car is fast as is and its got a smooth power band. Not jerky and messed up like the STi. I'll just drive as is. I only asked because I was curious, everyone knows the MM act is useless in most cases |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands