horsepower upgrades
It's easy to boost your stock 2017 '43 to power levels slightly higher than the 2019 with any of the mild piggybacks out there. The Dinan sport is the cheapest, it'll get you to about 400 crank hp. The JB1 is only a little bit more expensive and it'll get you quite a bit more hp than a stock 2019 is rated for. The Racechip is the most expensive and slots higher than the Dinan but less than the JB1. Most of these piggybacks are very simple installations that are basically plug and play.
Why doesnt MB just produce a C43 with the same HP as that with a tune?
Thanks.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
It is the same as 16-18
I doubt boosting the turbos 1.5psi each- (which is what you get from JB1 on map 2) would damage the turbos anymore than usual. Since turbos started becoming popular in the mid to late 80's, performance enthusiasts have been boosting them 5-8 psi or more over stock- BMW even had a feature a few years back called "overboost" which allowed the turbo to provide boost over max stock numbers for a brief period.
In theory I am sure the engineers compensated by allowing quite a bit more than the 6 psi max each turbo see's stock and remember full boost is only under wide open throttle- which most only do briefly, unless your tracking it.
Last edited by Lazz83; Aug 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM.
Update: Just checked and saw the 19 gets a bigger turbo charger? That's great, anyone know what the flow rate is? What is the flow rate of the c450/c43 (16-18)?
Last edited by sliqdaddy91; Aug 24, 2018 at 01:17 PM.
As for a casual connection, Sven and da boys say, “Ya, sure, you betcha!”

Can mb tell if you used a piggyback?




Now that does not mean that if you have a suspension component fail or or your window motor dies, or whatever else, that it won't be covered, as those parts don't necessarily have any relation to the tune. It's just not as black and white as saying "tune = warranty voided."
Last note for the new people in this thread....if you enjoy being confused and reading muddled legalese, CFG is your best friend. Otherwise, don't feed the troll.
I'd like for someone to show me just one case of a consumer suing an auto manf. under MM and winning. Just one.




and, the guy recovered attirney’s fees AND costs as provided in the act....
and, the guy recovered attirney’s fees AND costs as provided in the act....
https://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/28/...-car-warranty/
"In such cases where the vehicle was under warranty, claims were denied and engine warranties were voided; the carmaker simply confirmed that head gasket failure was indeed due to installation of the power chips. The carmaker was (again) well within its right to deny claims and void engine warranties."
People have a right to sue for negligence, but that merely deters it, and does not stop it.
Peple have a right to sue for defective products, yet manufacturers continue to....
You miss the point, whether by design or neglect.
Go ahead and tune your vehicle and when you request warranty service for a fouled fuel injector I will be laughing.

I agree with Clint though. If I put a tune on, pop a motor, and get denied warranty claim, I would come out the pocket, swap the motor and move on with my life. I doubt I would win and it wouldn't be worth trying.
But if I thought there was no way MB could detect the tune I might consider it...
But really though, the car is fast as is and its got a smooth power band. Not jerky and messed up like the STi. I'll just drive as is.
I only asked because I was curious, everyone knows the MM act is useless in most cases





