JB4 installed.....UMMMMM WOW
ill make some videos on the weekend and share.
You don't have to cut your engine cover if you just remove it. If you wanted to make it stock again theres always one of those engine covers for sale on Ebay. I'll sell you mine if you want it
I think the BMS intake air filters are in the better spot in the engine bay and I think the BMS sounds a lot better too.
I think the BMS intake air filters are in the better spot in the engine bay and I think the BMS sounds a lot better too.
You don't have to cut your engine cover if you just remove it. If you wanted to make it stock again theres always one of those engine covers for sale on Ebay. I'll sell you mine if you want it 
I think the BMS intake air filters are in the better spot in the engine bay and I think the BMS sounds a lot better too.

I think the BMS intake air filters are in the better spot in the engine bay and I think the BMS sounds a lot better too.
I think you are really splitting hairs between the two. I don't mean to discourage anyone from buying the MST or encourage anyone to buy the BMS. It is just from an engineering standpoint I like how the BMS is set up just a tad better. I took the engine cover out anyways because I don't think it adds any value except just takes up space and maybe even captures more heat inside the bay.
I think you are really splitting hairs between the two. I don't mean to discourage anyone from buying the MST or encourage anyone to buy the BMS. It is just from an engineering standpoint I like how the BMS is set up just a tad better. I took the engine cover out anyways because I don't think it adds any value except just takes up space and maybe even captures more heat inside the bay.
Well, there are no definitive answers to this, but those of us who have or have had BMS and MST have observed higher intake air temps than the original airbox. Looking at the design, it is obvious why. However, the performance gains are immediate noticeable. So, really, there's no perfect air intake.
Well, there are no definitive answers to this, but those of us who have or have had BMS and MST have observed higher intake air temps than the original airbox. Looking at the design, it is obvious why. However, the performance gains are immediate noticeable. So, really, there's no perfect air intake.
There's a guy that made a video showing how he wrapped the pipes and heat shield in heat resistant wrap and it lowered the overall temps by 10+ degrees Fahrenheit. I thought it was pretty interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7bXN6OfE1E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7bXN6OfE1E
I’m really not sure how informative the video is seeing as how he takes the temperature of the outside of the pipe that he has put the foil over. It’s bound to be cooler cos of the foil, but that’s not really relevant. Also he takes the temp of the air filter. Why? What’s more relevant would be the intake air temperature or the temperature of the inside of the pipe.
I've been wrapping pipes for years in motorcycle racing. In that scene, the goal is not to reduce intake temps, but to reduce heat felt by the rider. Wrapping pipes (whether they be headers, midpipes or tailpipes) prevents heat from escaping the pipe before exhaust, but it does nothing to change the IAT.
When you say "worth the $ over EC," JB4 is less expensive than EC. However, there is no way the JB4 will make more power. EC is a proper ECU tune whereas JB4 is a piggyback.



