AMG Performance Exhaust - Functional or Ear Candy?



It certainly does have a nice throaty growl to it when turned on, but does it give the car anything in the way of extra HP or the like?



I think not, to me anyway. If I was 20yrs old, maybe.
I think a lot of people here buy the C43 because of the sound, just my thoughts anyways...



I think a lot of people here buy the C43 because of the sound, just my thoughts anyways...
We've given our local dealer the task to try and find a good CPO version of each, but are keeping our options open.
Trending Topics



Yes, I am aware of the other goodies. And I agree about the 19 inch wheels. Those are all what I consider 'nice to haves' but not necessary, in my way of thinking. Since I am never going near a track with the car, increasing the top speed to 250km, well, not much chance of me ever getting anywhere near that speed.
Regards.....Pete
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I think a lot of people here buy the C43 because of the sound, just my thoughts anyways...
Last edited by superswiss; Mar 1, 2021 at 05:50 PM.
as they always say "Dad put the car in Sport +". Just saying.The C63 coupe is my dream car but rear wheel drive steer me towards the C43 coupe. The wide body of C63 is just a head turner, still drooling when I see one but my C43 is just an amazing car with the Driver's package (C63 inside).
Last edited by Rockyrainier; Mar 1, 2021 at 09:45 PM.
).After doing 5 years of seasonal tire/wheel swaps with the C63 and having to drive like a grandma with a skinny square winter setup, I was ready to drive something I could launch hard in all 4 seasons. It wasn't a huge hassle to "winterize" the W204, and powerful RWD cars are very competent with the right boots, but it's been nice to skip those steps the past few years.
I guess there's an argument to be made that 4MATIC isn't just a practicality compromise, but a performance one too. But as the technology improves, and as the cars become heavier anyway, I think that becomes less true.




).After doing 5 years of seasonal tire/wheel swaps with the C63 and having to drive like a grandma with a skinny square winter setup, I was ready to drive something I could launch hard in all 4 seasons. It wasn't a huge hassle to "winterize" the W204, and powerful RWD cars are very competent with the right boots, but it's been nice to skip those steps the past few years.
I guess there's an argument to be made that 4MATIC isn't just a practicality compromise, but a performance one too. But as the technology improves, and as the cars become heavier anyway, I think that becomes less true.
The reality is that AWD really only is a benefit up to about 30 mph in adverse conditions. Outside of that and for stopping it's dead weight at best and a false sense of security at worst. I've read one study that concluded in the real world the benefits of AWD are used only 1% of the time, or in other words for every 10,000 miles it's only a benefit for a 100 miles. That kinda puts the added complexity, weight etc. in question. Unfortunately, the perception among many customers is that they "need" AWD, so AMG is making all future models 4Matic. It's really a shame to be honest. Yes, I live in CA, and we have about 300 dry days on average every year and yes, when the roads are wet I have to take it somewhat easy and if we drive up to the mountains in the winter we have to take a different car, but I buy my cars for the majority of days and not the occasional few days where I might have to leave it in the garage, because the conditions aren't right.
Just curious where you live, how often are the roads actually not cleared when you drive in the winter? My previous car was an Audi RS5, so quattro and it certainly made it easier to put down the power even here in our dry climate, but it also robbed a lot of live out of the car. While I enjoyed my two Audis I had, eventually I just had to admit that AWD has more disadvantages than it has advantages, but everybody's situation is different and not everybody has the luxury of waiting out bad weather or has another car in the garage they can drive on those days. I do have to say, though as opposed to the 4Matic in the C43 and quattro, the new 4Matic+ puts 100% of the power/torque to the rear in normal driving and only engages the front wheels if the traction situation demands it. So you kinda get the best of both worlds. It's almost purely RWD when it's dry out, but it gives you the extra traction when roads are slippery. One of the things that really started to bother me with the Audis is the effect AWD has on steering. It just messes with the steering and causes understeer, because the front tires have to do two things at the same time. There's always a hint of torque steer, too.
The reality is that AWD really only is a benefit up to about 30 mph in adverse conditions. Outside of that and for stopping it's dead weight at best and a false sense of security at worst. I've read one study that concluded in the real world the benefits of AWD are used only 1% of the time, or in other words for every 10,000 miles it's only a benefit for a 100 miles. That kinda puts the added complexity, weight etc. in question. Unfortunately, the perception among many customers is that they "need" AWD, so AMG is making all future models 4Matic. It's really a shame to be honest. Yes, I live in CA, and we have about 300 dry days on average every year and yes, when the roads are wet I have to take it somewhat easy and if we drive up to the mountains in the winter we have to take a different car, but I buy my cars for the majority of days and not the occasional few days where I might have to leave it in the garage, because the conditions aren't right.
Just curious where you live, how often are the roads actually not cleared when you drive in the winter? My previous car was an Audi RS5, so quattro and it certainly made it easier to put down the power even here in our dry climate, but it also robbed a lot of live out of the car. While I enjoyed my two Audis I had, eventually I just had to admit that AWD has more disadvantages than it has advantages, but everybody's situation is different and not everybody has the luxury of waiting out bad weather or has another car in the garage they can drive on those days. I do have to say, though as opposed to the 4Matic in the C43 and quattro, the new 4Matic+ puts 100% of the power/torque to the rear in normal driving and only engages the front wheels if the traction situation demands it. So you kinda get the best of both worlds. It's almost purely RWD when it's dry out, but it gives you the extra traction when roads are slippery. One of the things that really started to bother me with the Audis is the effect AWD has on steering. It just messes with the steering and causes understeer, because the front tires have to do two things at the same time. There's always a hint of torque steer, too.
But I do agree that, generally, once the car is in motion, especially above a certain speed threshold, it becomes more about the rubber than the drivetrain.
I live in Indiana. And when we get severe thunderstorms (which can occur weekly any time from April to the end of September), it rains hard. Throwing all theoretical and technical discussions out the window for a moment, and taking into account my experience living with a variety of vehicles in those those conditions (including with max performance summer tires on a RWD car and above-average all-season tires on an AWD car), the AWD option is generally more confidence-inspiring, irrespective of driver skill level. Is it an absolute necessity? Not 100% of the time in those conditions, but I'm just going off of pure experience and what I've felt in terms of how I can drive the car in those conditions.
With respect to the roads in the winter, the plowing where I live is generally very good. But independent contractors are responsible for neighborhoods and back roads, and both these neighborhoods and back roads can have hills. Furthermore, it all depends on the timing of the snow. If it hits during the morning or evening rush hour, there's nothing the plow/salt trucks can really do, because there's too much traffic. Everyone's crawling and constantly starting and stopping, which is where I've noticed that the AWD is a noticeable advantage.
Especially when you're inching toward a stoplight at the top of a tall hill with a decently steep approach angle. I have a hill/stoplight combo like this not too far from my home, and during the polar vortex winter a few years ago, I was white-knuckling it up the hill in my C63 with Dunlop Winter Maxx (which were a dedicated ice/snow tire). I had to strike the perfect balance between carrying speed and managing subtle throttle inputs. In my C43 with the crappy stock all-season Conti RFTs, I took the hill at just under the speed limit.
In sum, I definitely hear where you're coming from re: buying the car for the majority of days you encounter, but with the unpredictable weather we get here, you have to be ready for anything at any time in a given season, which means you can't get caught out on the wrong tire at the wrong time. There were winters with the C63 where we barely got any snow, and heavy-duty winter tires felt like a waste. There were others where my dash's ESP light doubled as an onboard Christmas tree.
If I lived in CA, it would be RWD all day long. 300+ days of nice weather (as you mentioned), plus some of the best driving roads in the entire country! One thing is for sure, despite how good the AWD engineering gets, there is no substitute for the front-end responsiveness of a well-sorted, balanced RWD car with precise steering.
Yes, I am aware of the other goodies. And I agree about the 19 inch wheels. Those are all what I consider 'nice to haves' but not necessary, in my way of thinking. Since I am never going near a track with the car, increasing the top speed to 250km, well, not much chance of me ever getting anywhere near that speed.
Regards.....Pete
Hmmm not sure why the E450 you were looking at were at such premium, is it because you are looking at the facelift? The pfl should be cheaper than the C43 even.
Edit: nevermind you said you were looking at CPOs... I understand the E450 is an E class therefore more premium but I do not expect such premium. At least comparing to pfl C43 it used to be very similar to pfl E450 in terms of pricing. I guess cuz of COVID, everything is more expensive now.


