C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Car and Driver: C63 AMG v '07 Audi RS 4 v '08 BMW M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 08:05 AM
  #126  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
Originally Posted by ravendog
0-60 in 3.9 seconds
1/4 mile at 12.3 seconds @ 116 mph
10 mpg

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...08-bmw-m3.html
WOW, after reading the article, I know which one will be parked in my driveway a few years from now when it falls like ALL the other MB

Its funny, EVERYTHING car and driver said about why they like the M, is WHY I NO LONGER drive one. NO bottom end Torque, only fun at the limits, and makes you work to enjoy it. For a track car, okay its the one, for an everyday drive, I THINK NOT.

Oh well, THANK YOU AMG engineers for bringing home the bacon, AGAIN

See yeah
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #127  
ctC230K's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 2
From: Connecticut
excites your girlfriend
Originally Posted by GBlansten
That is because the AMG is an auto and the M3 is a manual. Obviously the auto downshifts and the manual driver is not allowed to do that. This question comes up often.
that is a pointless test then. why wouldn't they put the c63 in manual mode on highest gear and then try that?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #128  
dsb's Avatar
dsb
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: sac, calif.
'06 slk55
Originally Posted by ctC230K
that is a pointless test then. why wouldn't they put the c63 in manual mode on highest gear and then try that?
Exactly. It only makes sense manual vs manual. It is a flawed test, one I disregard. I've often thought of writing a letter to the publication. I think all test should be conducted in the optimal gear. That way Automatic that have no M mode would still be represented correctly.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #129  
Slater126's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
2002 C32, 2011 VW GTI
Man, I'm still caught up on this 10 MPG thing. I hope to buy this car in '11 or so (a used one). I'll watch other articles and I hope it's false. Otherwise, the M3/4 is going to be mighty tempting.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #130  
bfnnrgn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
Originally Posted by Slater126
Man, I'm still caught up on this 10 MPG thing. I hope to buy this car in '11 or so (a used one). I'll watch other articles and I hope it's false. Otherwise, the M3/4 is going to be mighty tempting.
I don't believe it will be anywhere near 10. In my E55 I could get it down to 9mpg but that was stop, floor it to 60, stop floor it, over and over while screwing around. The E55 sucked gas worse than the E63 does. Even driving aggressively in city streets I still got 15ish. Highways 24. I don't know where they got 10 from but it wasn't driving it on the road.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 12:01 AM
  #131  
Slater126's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
2002 C32, 2011 VW GTI
Originally Posted by bfnnrgn
I don't believe it will be anywhere near 10. In my E55 I could get it down to 9mpg but that was stop, floor it to 60, stop floor it, over and over while screwing around. The E55 sucked gas worse than the E63 does. Even driving aggressively in city streets I still got 15ish. Highways 24. I don't know where they got 10 from but it wasn't driving it on the road.
I tend to think the same thing. They probably beat the living snot out of it and got that mileage. I don't think it will be great MPG-wise but I'd expect 15 MPG average. I could tolerate that.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 11:08 AM
  #132  
360_iti's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
From: Bloomfield Hills, MI
W203, W211, W219, W212
I think it's a typo. EPA city is always considered the worst, so why the "700 miles" mpg is even worse than the city ?
Look at the numbers again.

EPA City : 13 mpg
EPA Highway : 20 mpg
700 miles : 10 mpg ????? Something doesn't add up.

I call it
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #133  
c32used's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 8
LET C32 2002
What a pitty that once again BMW beats the competition with less hp and better suspension.....thank God I care less what those journalist think....C63 rocks!!! 10MPG or not
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #134  
360_iti's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
From: Bloomfield Hills, MI
W203, W211, W219, W212
The main reason C&D liked it better because it was "the most sporting and emotionally appealing (whatever), and the relationship it fosters with the driver".
They also said "this latest M3 offers the purest, least diluted, most involving, and best-in-class driver-and-machine relationship

I don't think the C63 is inferior to the M3 in the handling department, and there's no question about performance. So it must be the manual transmission that played a pretty big role in bringing about the conclusion.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #135  
gkstar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
C32 AMG - in Pewter
Originally Posted by 360_iti
The main reason C&D liked it better because it was "the most sporting and emotionally appealing (whatever), and the relationship it fosters with the driver".
They also said "this latest M3 offers the purest, least diluted, most involving, and best-in-class driver-and-machine relationship
Sound like a long going love affair to me, Look at the expressions they used .

I could hardly hold my tears

Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #136  
MBNorCal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
2006 C350 Sport 6MT, 2000 BMW 323ci
that's not even the full potential of the 63 engine. bring it up to the 520hp!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #137  
MERCaudi's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Audi A8L 4.2 - LX470
Originally Posted by caliboy
I really hate the fact that these freakin comparisons never take into account that the M3 always cheats indirectly because IT'S A TWO DOOR CAR vs TWO FOUR DOOR CARS. WAIT TILL THE 4door M3 comes out and whach who wins. The M3 is going to get it's **** handed to it. Could you imagine a two door C63.....and no not the heavy **** clk63, but a real two door C63. It will kill the M3 even more.
I raised this same point time and time again on another form. The only comparisons that matters in this segment is...

C63 vs. RS4 vs. E90 M3
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #138  
chiphomme's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Fargo, North Dakota
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by MERCaudi
I raised this same point time and time again on another form. The only comparisons that matters in this segment is...

C63 vs. RS4 vs. E90 M3


BMW "cheats"? Who is aiming at whom? Sorry to burst your bubble but Mercedes was aiming the C63 at the iconic M3, not the other way round. So you should really ask why Mercedes didn't make a coupe instead of 4 door?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #139  
360_iti's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
From: Bloomfield Hills, MI
W203, W211, W219, W212
Originally Posted by chiphomme
Sorry to burst your bubble but Mercedes was aiming the C63 at the iconic M3, not the other way round.
I agree.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #140  
MERCaudi's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Audi A8L 4.2 - LX470
Originally Posted by chiphomme
BMW "cheats"? Who is aiming at whom? Sorry to burst your bubble but Mercedes was aiming the C63 at the iconic M3, not the other way round. So you should really ask why Mercedes didn't make a coupe instead of 4 door?
I honestly believe Mercedes true intent is to make the C63 class leader in the small luxury sedan segment. Think about it, the E92 M3 barely outperforms if at all the C63 which offers top notch interior to go with it's amazing performance. Furthermore it would make more sense for Mercedes to try in top the B7 RS4 if anything..
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #141  
hkycoldrct's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
2002 C32 ///AMG
I'm thinking these numbers may be fairly optimistic. 3.9/12.2 would make that one fricking hell-of-a-beast on the road. At these posted times you can almost go Z06 hunting. One of the other magazines had the 0-60 and quarter mile times a little higher and more along the lines of what I thougt the car would be -- 4.2 - 4.3 ish in the 0-60 category. If these numbers ring true, the 450 HP avertised is just marketing (closer to 500) to keep the C in check with the E and S class. God forbid the C have more ponies than the E!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 09:05 PM
  #142  
hkycoldrct's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
2002 C32 ///AMG
Originally Posted by Slater126
Man, I'm still caught up on this 10 MPG thing. I hope to buy this car in '11 or so (a used one). I'll watch other articles and I hope it's false. Otherwise, the M3/4 is going to be mighty tempting.
By that time none of us will be able to afford it at $50.00 a gallon!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #143  
kwontumspeed's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
93 500e<P>94 E320T "Sportline"<P>90 FJ62
Originally Posted by hkycoldrct
By that time none of us will be able to afford it at $50.00 a gallon!
Hold that thought. Remember, we're in bed with Brazil and they justed discovered an oil field that will place them in the top10 global exporters of petrol. Good for us, I mean the US that is. So by the time our kids get their hands on our preciously driven (ahem) C63s and other V8s (I prefer handing my first born my cherry 500E), maybe barrel prices will be...shuck, who the hell am I trying to kid?!

10MPG, it's an error. Come on, look at all the other real world stats for all V8s from Stutt or across the countryside. And speaking of real world stats in minds, yes, the C63 is an auto, but BMW has got to have a smidget of a complex that a 4 door sedan has been chomping the bit at it's 2door powerhouse. Sure, put 3 passengers & driver in the C63 and 2 in the M3 and you'll watch it creep away from you at a launch, but take that same "real world" scenario with the same set up at speeds and you'll easily have four people in the C63 snickering that a 2door, 2passenger BMW was handed it's tail on a platter. No, I'm not saying that the C63 will smoke the M3, but at least you can show up a 2 door M3, and get to tee time early for four with bags in tow. That's what I admire about what AMG did with this SEDAN.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #144  
c32used's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 8
LET C32 2002
No matter what magazines say the C63 will do very well here...it looks better then there competition in my opinion and the power its bringing is something alot of V8s have to worry about.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 03:37 AM
  #145  
ash-c32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: london
996 C4, previously owned 996 c2, c32 amg, 350z, R33 GTR, R34 GTR
Originally Posted by c32used
No matter what magazines say the C63 will do very well here...it looks better then there competition in my opinion and the power its bringing is something alot of V8s have to worry about.
yes but there is more to life than just power (although it does help)

The m3 is a better drivers car is what the article is telling us.I think it is currently beyond AMG to make a real drivers car but it is getting closer. Maybe the next generation of models will major on lighter weight over the front axle and a more subtle chassis balance.If Audi can do it with the R8 then im sure AMG can.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #146  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
Originally Posted by ash-c32
yes but there is more to life than just power (although it does help)

The m3 is a better drivers car is what the article is telling us.I think it is currently beyond AMG to make a real drivers car but it is getting closer. Maybe the next generation of models will major on lighter weight over the front axle and a more subtle chassis balance.If Audi can do it with the R8 then im sure AMG can.
AS I said before and I will say it again, since I owned a M3 and a M roadster with the E46 motor.

Yes the M is better on the track and at the limits, ie it MAKES you dirve the car, however for the other 99.99% of the time I will take my C32, or ANY AMG over the M for just that reason.
You can truely enjoy driving a AMG, WITHOUT having to work for the fun. Little things like torque below 4000 rpm is just ONE of my issues here.
Suit yourself, but I will NOT go back to BMW's even with a HIGH reving V-8, COME ON C63, deprecieate already, LIKE ALL AMG's, so I can afford you

See yeah
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #147  
Improviz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by ash-c32
The m3 is a better drivers car is what the article is telling us.I think it is currently beyond AMG to make a real drivers car but it is getting closer.
Well, I think that's overstating things a bit....just because they not-at-all-biased editors at C&D picked the M over the AMG doesn't mean that the AMG is not a "real drivers car"....in fact, there have been numerous reviews from overseas rags (including EVO and others that are much better than C&D) that have given the AMG great compliments on its steering, handling dynamics, etc.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #148  
gkstar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
C32 AMG - in Pewter
Originally Posted by ash-c32
yes but there is more to life than just power (although it does help)
.
I would turn the table and say if the world was covered with twisty roads only and I cannot live w/o manual, yeah I may choose the M and feel the lack of under steer at the limits and a better driver's connection.

Step out of that world and C63 rules and difference is not just subtle, IMHO.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 04:07 AM
  #149  
ash-c32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: london
996 C4, previously owned 996 c2, c32 amg, 350z, R33 GTR, R34 GTR
Originally Posted by gkstar
I would turn the table and say if the world was covered with twisty roads only and I cannot live w/o manual, yeah I may choose the M and feel the lack of under steer at the limits and a better driver's connection.

Step out of that world and C63 rules and difference is not just subtle, IMHO.
so if you live on roads that are only straight an auto car is much better?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #150  
Improviz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by ash-c32
so if you live on roads that are only straight an auto car is much better?
I wasn't aware that the transmission a vehicle is fitted with affects the maximum speed at which it can corner, or its cornering grip. I was under the impression that this is related to things like tires, suspension, structural rigidity, weight, weight distribution, and weight transfer.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE