Car and Driver: C63 AMG v '07 Audi RS 4 v '08 BMW M3

1/4 mile at 12.3 seconds @ 116 mph

10 mpg

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...08-bmw-m3.html

Its funny, EVERYTHING car and driver said about why they like the M, is WHY I NO LONGER drive one. NO bottom end Torque, only fun at the limits, and makes you work to enjoy it. For a track car, okay its the one, for an everyday drive, I THINK NOT.
Oh well, THANK YOU AMG engineers for bringing home the bacon, AGAIN
See yeah
Look at the numbers again.
EPA City : 13 mpg
EPA Highway : 20 mpg
700 miles : 10 mpg ????? Something doesn't add up.
I call it

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
They also said "this latest M3 offers the purest, least diluted, most involving, and best-in-class driver-and-machine relationship
I don't think the C63 is inferior to the M3 in the handling department, and there's no question about performance. So it must be the manual transmission that played a pretty big role in bringing about the conclusion.
They also said "this latest M3 offers the purest, least diluted, most involving, and best-in-class driver-and-machine relationship
. I could hardly hold my tears

C63 vs. RS4 vs. E90 M3
BMW "cheats"? Who is aiming at whom? Sorry to burst your bubble but Mercedes was aiming the C63 at the iconic M3, not the other way round. So you should really ask why Mercedes didn't make a coupe instead of 4 door?
10MPG, it's an error. Come on, look at all the other real world stats for all V8s from Stutt or across the countryside. And speaking of real world stats in minds, yes, the C63 is an auto, but BMW has got to have a smidget of a complex that a 4 door sedan has been chomping the bit at it's 2door powerhouse. Sure, put 3 passengers & driver in the C63 and 2 in the M3 and you'll watch it creep away from you at a launch, but take that same "real world" scenario with the same set up at speeds and you'll easily have four people in the C63 snickering that a 2door, 2passenger BMW was handed it's tail on a platter. No, I'm not saying that the C63 will smoke the M3, but at least you can show up a 2 door M3, and get to tee time early for four with bags in tow. That's what I admire about what AMG did with this SEDAN.
)The m3 is a better drivers car is what the article is telling us.I think it is currently beyond AMG to make a real drivers car but it is getting closer. Maybe the next generation of models will major on lighter weight over the front axle and a more subtle chassis balance.If Audi can do it with the R8 then im sure AMG can.
)The m3 is a better drivers car is what the article is telling us.I think it is currently beyond AMG to make a real drivers car but it is getting closer. Maybe the next generation of models will major on lighter weight over the front axle and a more subtle chassis balance.If Audi can do it with the R8 then im sure AMG can.
Yes the M is better on the track and at the limits, ie it MAKES you dirve the car, however for the other 99.99% of the time I will take my C32, or ANY AMG over the M for just that reason.
You can truely enjoy driving a AMG, WITHOUT having to work for the fun. Little things like torque below 4000 rpm is just ONE of my issues here.
Suit yourself, but I will NOT go back to BMW's even with a HIGH reving V-8, COME ON C63, deprecieate already, LIKE ALL AMG's, so I can afford you

See yeah
Step out of that world and C63 rules and difference is not just subtle, IMHO.
Step out of that world and C63 rules and difference is not just subtle, IMHO.







10MPG or not
