Sport Auto C63 vs M3 test!
03-30-2008, 04:12 PM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG
Sport Auto C63 vs M3 test!
03-30-2008, 05:10 PM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here are the results.
E90 M3 - C63
0-100kph: 4.9s - 4.4s
0-200kph: 16.3s - 14.0s
Hockenheim: 1:15.2 - 1:15.2
18 meter slalom: 68.2 kph - 66.0 kph
Braking distance (100kph): 36.7/33.8m - 36.6/35.3m
Fuel consumption: 16.4l - 21.2l
E90 M3 - C63
0-100kph: 4.9s - 4.4s
0-200kph: 16.3s - 14.0s
Hockenheim: 1:15.2 - 1:15.2
18 meter slalom: 68.2 kph - 66.0 kph
Braking distance (100kph): 36.7/33.8m - 36.6/35.3m
Fuel consumption: 16.4l - 21.2l
03-31-2008, 12:42 PM
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 AMG, Porsche Cayenne Turbo
04-01-2008, 07:17 PM
#7
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
The addition of the LSD is obviously what helps the C63...the 030 pack is $4K, so that puts the C63 a good deal ahead of the M, just to match it's performance...
Top Gear has also achieved much better times at Hockenheim with the new M, so those times are subject...
Top Gear has also achieved much better times at Hockenheim with the new M, so those times are subject...
