C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rear Differential Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-22-2008, 06:59 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clktoc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 Performance Package - Steel Grey/Sahara Biege
Rear Differential Question

Anyone know the rear gear ratio for the c63? Do we know if it stays the same if we upgrade to the LSD in the performance package?

Not sure with this car, but with other cars, you often get a more aggressive rear gear ratio when you get a LSD or posi-type rear.
Old 06-22-2008, 07:28 PM
  #2  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
Ratios

Final drive: 2.85

1st gear: 4.38
2nd gear: 2.86
3rd gear: 1.92
4th gear: 1.37
5th gear: 1.00
6th gear: 0.82
7th gear: 0.73
Old 06-22-2008, 07:33 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
dlbello's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63 AMG Black on Black PP Package CF fully loaded
Originally Posted by e1000
Ratios

Final drive: 2.85

1st gear: 4.38
2nd gear: 2.86
3rd gear: 1.92
4th gear: 1.37
5th gear: 1.00
6th gear: 0.82
7th gear: 0.73
Is this different from the Non PP setup??? is there a difference in gear ratio with or without?
Old 06-22-2008, 07:40 PM
  #4  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
that should be the number for the non-PP setup but I don't think the LSD has a different ratio
Old 06-22-2008, 10:25 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clktoc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 Performance Package - Steel Grey/Sahara Biege
Originally Posted by e1000
Ratios

Final drive: 2.85

1st gear: 4.38
2nd gear: 2.86
3rd gear: 1.92
4th gear: 1.37
5th gear: 1.00
6th gear: 0.82
7th gear: 0.73
Thanks for the info. Given the low 2.85 number, those looking for performance increases may be well served to look at their rears [insert joke here]
Old 06-23-2008, 12:15 AM
  #6  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
Originally Posted by clktoc63
Thanks for the info. Given the low 2.85 number, those looking for performance increases may be well served to look at their rears [insert joke here]
Not really. With 255's in the rear, I don't think TQ in 1st is the issue here.
Old 06-23-2008, 11:31 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clktoc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 Performance Package - Steel Grey/Sahara Biege
Originally Posted by e1000
Not really. With 255's in the rear, I don't think TQ in 1st is the issue here.
Agree completely with the first gear comment, but 2.85 is a low number for a performance car. A steeper gear (higher number) will help across the other 6 gears by keeping the RPMs a few hundred higher at the bottom of each up-shift.

As I listen to all of the videos of this car, I have (seemingly) noticed that it sounds a few hundred RPMs too low at the bottom of the next gear at each wide open throttle up-shift. Anyone else notice this?

It would be interesting if someone could tell us where that RPM needle drops to between each up-shift, then we could match that up to the hp/torque curve of the engine.

I'm not in my '09 yet and am talking purely from theory, so just my opinion.
Old 06-23-2008, 11:53 AM
  #8  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
Originally Posted by clktoc63
Agree completely with the first gear comment, but 2.85 is a low number for a performance car. A steeper gear (higher number) will help across the other 6 gears by keeping the RPMs a few hundred higher at the bottom of each up-shift.

As I listen to all of the videos of this car, I have (seemingly) noticed that it sounds a few hundred RPMs too low at the bottom of the next gear at each wide open throttle up-shift. Anyone else notice this?

It would be interesting if someone could tell us where that RPM needle drops to between each up-shift, then we could match that up to the hp/torque curve of the engine.

I'm not in my '09 yet and am talking purely from theory, so just my opinion.
good point. I have a spreadsheet at home that will spit this out. I bet that given it's relatively high torque rating and broad, flat power curve, the tall gearing is ok.
Old 06-23-2008, 12:16 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Wanna make sure our newer Benz family members are aware of the evil that is the Benz ECU. I say the word evil in that the ECU has been the hold back on much of the modding on these cars that have soooo much potential for higher hp. Talked to several tuners that all say the same thing, the Benz ECU is very hard to crack and mod, thus not a lot of tuners doing it.

Car is wonderful granted but it's just jam packed with electronics that Benz has all talking to each other.

If anyone of you C63'rs wants to tinker with the rear end in the future, just know that you will need a complete new tranny TCU program to go with it.

If the tranny senses the new rear diff ratio, it sends the car into limp mode as a safetly measure.

Just a heads up as this discussion came up.

Carry on.
Old 06-23-2008, 12:18 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
whoover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 4,128
Received 310 Likes on 228 Posts
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by e1000
good point. I have a spreadsheet at home that will spit this out. I bet that given it's relatively high torque rating and broad, flat power curve, the tall gearing is ok.
It's an academic question. In the days of ECUs, TCUs, ESP, BAS, etc., you can't just change the ring and pinion to change the final ratio. You'll start throwing codes when the electronics detect rpms don't match expected mph. There are probably tuners who could modify the appropriate programming, but it's not trivial.
Old 06-23-2008, 12:41 PM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
e1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
Originally Posted by whoover
It's an academic question. In the days of ECUs, TCUs, ESP, BAS, etc., you can't just change the ring and pinion to change the final ratio. You'll start throwing codes when the electronics detect rpms don't match expected mph. There are probably tuners who could modify the appropriate programming, but it's not trivial.
hey I wasn't the OP nor was I condoning going to a shorter final drive.
Old 06-26-2008, 09:18 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clktoc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 Performance Package - Steel Grey/Sahara Biege
Originally Posted by whoover
It's an academic question. In the days of ECUs, TCUs, ESP, BAS, etc., you can't just change the ring and pinion to change the final ratio. You'll start throwing codes when the electronics detect rpms don't match expected mph. There are probably tuners who could modify the appropriate programming, but it's not trivial.
What a shame, for cars with OBDII (GM) like my covette it's a piece of cake. My $300 Hypertech allows me with the push of a single buton (up or down) to change my rear gear ratios and tire diameter. And of course keeps the car cooler, adds horsepower via fuel and spark curves, etc.

I know, I'm preaching to the choir when I complain about ECU and tuning prices here...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rear Differential Question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.