C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

C63 vs Z4 M-coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-27-2009, 08:10 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paizesb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 64
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 AMG GT-S
C63 vs Z4 M-coupe

My Cousin and I got a bee in our bonnets arguing whose car is faster whose car looks better so we settled the debate last night once and for all. We did four runs, stop light till stop light.(Dont worry it was 3 am and nobody in sight). The c63 jumped the z4m on all occasions. I thought we would get in front of me on his 1st & 2nd gear but not the case. 1st was neck and neck 2nd I just put my nose in front after that is was like "unleash the fury" I pulled at least 4 car lenghts on him. This car has got ***** made of steel . My cousin kept on saying my car has been tuned and it hasnt its bone stock. He feels sick it makes me proud to be part of the ///AMG family.
Old 11-27-2009, 09:27 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
derrick_lui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My ex-cars: 03 E55,04 C32, 05 C55 ,03 E320
C63 451HP
M Coupe 333HP

4 Car lengths ? I dont see anything unusual about that =D
Old 11-27-2009, 10:09 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
2K6E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMGs
AMG POWAR
Old 11-27-2009, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
Originally Posted by paizesb
My Cousin and I got a bee in our bonnets arguing whose car is faster whose car looks better so we settled the debate last night once and for all. We did four runs, stop light till stop light.(Dont worry it was 3 am and nobody in sight). The c63 jumped the z4m on all occasions. I thought we would get in front of me on his 1st & 2nd gear but not the case. 1st was neck and neck 2nd I just put my nose in front after that is was like "unleash the fury" I pulled at least 4 car lenghts on him. This car has got ***** made of steel . My cousin kept on saying my car has been tuned and it hasnt its bone stock. He feels sick it makes me proud to be part of the ///AMG family.

Happy Thanksgiving
Old 11-27-2009, 12:04 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
nonsns3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63
One wins in a straightline. The other takes over in the twisties.
Old 11-27-2009, 12:28 PM
  #6  
Member
 
EuroB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG / B8 A4
Is your cousin retarded or something? The C63 will kill it each time, and if you did a first gear rolling start, you wouldve pulled harder and earlier.
Old 11-27-2009, 12:57 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
So which one's your cousin?



Just kidding.
Old 11-27-2009, 02:39 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paizesb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 64
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 AMG GT-S
he is the one in middle
Old 11-27-2009, 05:10 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Palladin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63 with Eurocharged tune and charcoal delete
Originally Posted by paizesb
My Cousin and I got a bee in our bonnets arguing whose car is faster.....
A bee in your bonnets? Are you guys 80 years old or what? I didn't know the Amish were allowed to drive cars, let alone AMGs. Nice upgrade over the horsedrawn buggy though, right. Congrats. Now get back to work on that fireplace.
Old 11-27-2009, 05:11 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
MikeS54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
I had a MZ4 and compared to C63 the power is nite and day. MZ4 is only slightly faster than a 335. I never had a chance to race a MZ4 yet but during my race against my friend's stock 335 I was pulling on him while changing gear at 4.5 rpm..... and he was flooring it lol.

However the cornering ability of the two cars is also nite and day, opposite result from the straightline speed lol.
Old 11-27-2009, 05:29 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Originally Posted by MikeS54
I had a MZ4 and compared to C63 the power is nite and day. MZ4 is only slightly faster than a 335. I never had a chance to race a MZ4 yet but during my race against my friend's stock 335 I was pulling on him while changing gear at 4.5 rpm..... and he was flooring it lol.

However the cornering ability of the two cars is also nite and day, opposite result from the straightline speed lol.
If you look at C/D's results over the past few years for their annual Lightning Lap around VIR, you can see that even the Z4 M doesn't come close to the performance of the C63 over the 4.2-mile circuit that includes quite a number of intricate corners.

See below:


Last edited by SebringSilver; 11-27-2009 at 05:33 PM.
Old 11-27-2009, 05:33 PM
  #12  
Member
 
EuroB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG / B8 A4
to me the C63 is a complete package. In all honesty, how many people really track their cars? I know a handful of people do, but the majority uses it for a daily driver or weekend car. During this time of driving, you are not racing around corners or twisties. You drive more straight line than anything. The C63 is more than capable around the track too. AMG really nailed it with this little car.
Old 11-27-2009, 06:07 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
chief63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
If you look at C/D's results over the past few years for their annual Lightning Lap around VIR, you can see that even the Z4 M doesn't come close to the performance of the C63 over the 4.2-mile circuit that includes quite a number of intricate corners.

See below:

BMW fan boys always say the M3 will kill a C63 on the track and that the C63 is only good in a straight line.

The M3 with better tires in the rear (and much wider at 305) managed to beat the C63 by 0.9 seconds on a 3min+ lap.

0.9 seconds! I Live in Canada and the cost of the M3 here is 72k while the C63 is 63K. Why would I choose an M3? Just changing to a better tire setup will make the C63 beat the M3 on a track for almost 10 grand less, plus it's faster in straight lines! Saying a C63 just can't handle the M3 on the track is BS.

Cya

Last edited by chief63; 11-27-2009 at 06:09 PM.
Old 11-27-2009, 06:33 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
MikeS54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
If you look at C/D's results over the past few years for their annual Lightning Lap around VIR, you can see that even the Z4 M doesn't come close to the performance of the C63 over the 4.2-mile circuit that includes quite a number of intricate corners.

See below:

Honestly i ve seen this a while ago

However i am not too found of the C.D testing result. Its accuracy is highly questionable.

911 turbo slower than m3 ..... we all know thats just not true.

To be honest from the result i have seen on other courses either nurburgring,tg times, etc... overall lap time between C63 and MZ4 is very similiar. Like i said C63 has a load of advantage on the straight while MZ4 has a big advantage in the corner.

All i can tell you is if you ve driven both you will notice immediately the amount of handling difference between the two.
Old 11-27-2009, 06:36 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by chief63
BMW fan boys always say the M3 will kill a C63 on the track and that the C63 is only good in a straight line.

The M3 with better tires in the rear (and much wider at 305) managed to beat the C63 by 0.9 seconds on a 3min+ lap.

0.9 seconds! I Live in Canada and the cost of the M3 here is 72k while the C63 is 63K. Why would I choose an M3? Just changing to a better tire setup will make the C63 beat the M3 on a track for almost 10 grand less, plus it's faster in straight lines! Saying a C63 just can't handle the M3 on the track is BS.

Cya
M3s come with 265s not 305s. Big difference. It's AMGs fault they under tire their cars. Changing tires, changing suspension...hell why not just use of Veyron to compare it to as it has four wheels right? And chucking around the "fanboy" term reveals you to be one yourself. The M3 and c63 both have their advantages and disadvantages, just get over it and enjoy your car.

as regards "Palladin"--being so offended by the term "bee in our bonnets" is plain

-Rob

Last edited by transferred; 11-27-2009 at 06:38 PM.
Old 11-27-2009, 08:14 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
MikeS54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by chief63

0.9 seconds! I Live in Canada and the cost of the M3 here is 72k while the C63 is 63K. Why would I choose an M3? Just changing to a better tire setup will make the C63 beat the M3 on a track for almost 10 grand less, plus it's faster in straight lines! Saying a C63 just can't handle the M3 on the track is BS.

Cya
In fact a decent equiped M3 sedan would go for mid 80k and 90 if you opt for the dct. While C63 with premium and pp will only cause you just over 70k .... huge difference in price up here.
Old 11-27-2009, 08:27 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bhamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,899
Received 92 Likes on 81 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by MikeS54
I had a MZ4 and compared to C63 the power is nite and day. MZ4 is only slightly faster than a 335. I never had a chance to race a MZ4 yet but during my race against my friend's stock 335 I was pulling on him while changing gear at 4.5 rpm..... and he was flooring it lol.

However the cornering ability of the two cars is also nite and day, opposite result from the straightline speed lol.
I have an '06 Z4 M Coupe...I find the difference in straight-line speed in the C63's favor is much greater than the advantage in cornering capability that the MZ4 enjoys. IMHO the C63 is a better package overall but these are two very different cars...it really depends on what you are looking for.

Last edited by bhamg; 11-29-2009 at 02:52 AM.
Old 11-27-2009, 08:37 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
wankeldude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with proper tires, the C63 is as fast as a 911 GT3 around most tracks.
Let the flaming begin.
Old 11-27-2009, 09:00 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
yooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a durr
Old 11-27-2009, 09:11 PM
  #20  
Z99
Member
 
Z99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c63 amg
Originally Posted by wankeldude
with proper tires, the C63 is as fast as a 911 GT3 around most tracks.
Let the flaming begin.

Allow me to add some fuel to the fire. With the set up below, I have been faster then a few GT3s around Beaver Run race track. Not a high horsepower track either.

K2
BMC filters
H&R Coilovers
Dunlops Direzzas 235 front, 265 back
Quaife LSD
Old 11-27-2009, 11:02 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
JAY55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soulcal
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
///E63V10 ///F80CS ///Can-Am X3 XRS
Originally Posted by Z99
Allow me to add some fuel to the fire. With the set up below, I have been faster then a few GT3s around Beaver Run race track. Not a high horsepower track either.

K2
BMC filters
H&R Coilovers
Dunlops Direzzas 235 front, 265 back
Quaife LSD

Nice set up
Old 11-27-2009, 11:59 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
peet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,249
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
09 C63
As my last car before the C63 was an M coupe I call BS. The M Coupe is a fantastic curve carver, it's absolute crap in a straight line. There just isn't anything in the engine room. Don't get me wrong, it was the best handling car ever and I loved every second of ownership, but it's not at all in the 63's class. Now if that car had a twin screw setup on top of the M motor - maybe, but filters and baubles - no way.

As for better looking? meh - that's like asking who's hotter when you're looking through the Victoria Secret catalog - the simple answer BOTH.

Best thing about the M coupe? No one else has one in your geographic region. I had mine on a 30 month lease and in that time saw only one other one - we were traveling head on in a 2 lane undivided road, both slowed down, giggled like school girls and waved. Obviously he never saw one either!
Old 11-28-2009, 01:17 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Originally Posted by peet
As my last car before the C63 was an M coupe I call BS. The M Coupe is a fantastic curve carver, it's absolute crap in a straight line. There just isn't anything in the engine room. Don't get me wrong, it was the best handling car ever and I loved every second of ownership, but it's not at all in the 63's class. Now if that car had a twin screw setup on top of the M motor - maybe, but filters and baubles - no way.

As for better looking? meh - that's like asking who's hotter when you're looking through the Victoria Secret catalog - the simple answer BOTH.

Best thing about the M coupe? No one else has one in your geographic region. I had mine on a 30 month lease and in that time saw only one other one - we were traveling head on in a 2 lane undivided road, both slowed down, giggled like school girls and waved. Obviously he never saw one either!
Good post.

Nice story to boot.
Old 11-28-2009, 01:57 AM
  #24  
Super Member
 
chief63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
Originally Posted by transferred
M3s come with 265s not 305s. Big difference. It's AMGs fault they under tire their cars. Changing tires, changing suspension...hell why not just use of Veyron to compare it to as it has four wheels right? And chucking around the "fanboy" term reveals you to be one yourself. The M3 and c63 both have their advantages and disadvantages, just get over it and enjoy your car.

as regards "Palladin"--being so offended by the term "bee in our bonnets" is plain

-Rob
I'm saying the CD M3 had 305s I didn't talk about suspension, just tire size.

If you can't read here is what I wrote:

"fan boys always say the M3 will kill a C63 on the track"

Well here are some numbers that prove that it's not killing it at all. M3 has a slight advantage on the track at best for almost 10K more here and slower speeds on pretty much any daily driver circumstances.
Old 12-06-2009, 12:31 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
peet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,249
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
09 C63
chief63: though he is comparing to an MZ4 - a VERY different car. Remember the motor is from the old E46 era engine, and the car weighs nearly nada. From experience, not numbers, the MZ4 will kill a C63 on a track if both are in stock form. Maybe, maybe, if the driver of the 63 has massive experience he'll be able to rein in the torque, but all the slip and slide will cost dearly.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 vs Z4 M-coupe



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.