C63 Performance Pack vs. BMW M3 Competition Pack? Meal of choice!
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
C63 Performance Pack vs. BMW M3 Competition Pack? Meal of choice!
Gentlemen С63 owners tell me how to solve the dilemma and yet not make a mistake when choosing a car!
In my opinion, with the M3 (rumored):
- Better balance;
- Engine technology from F1 box DCT (robot faster and more accurate);
- Charisma M / / / works!
In favor of С63:
-Engine engineers from AMG (in my opinion not better not worse, just different);
- Аwesome torque 600Nm;
-С63-I like both externally and internally more M3;
-More versatile (year-round use).
About driver:
Experience 7 years, had never before been so powerful rear-wheel drive cars, ride in the main more or less easy!
Many thanks for all the thoughts and opinions! Greetings from Russia!
Update: I visited some doubts about the adequacy of the engine cooling AMG, as well as the ability of staff to cope with an active brake riding? The owners, write your thoughts about this experience, please!
In my opinion, with the M3 (rumored):
- Better balance;
- Engine technology from F1 box DCT (robot faster and more accurate);
- Charisma M / / / works!
In favor of С63:
-Engine engineers from AMG (in my opinion not better not worse, just different);
- Аwesome torque 600Nm;
-С63-I like both externally and internally more M3;
-More versatile (year-round use).
About driver:
Experience 7 years, had never before been so powerful rear-wheel drive cars, ride in the main more or less easy!
Many thanks for all the thoughts and opinions! Greetings from Russia!
Update: I visited some doubts about the adequacy of the engine cooling AMG, as well as the ability of staff to cope with an active brake riding? The owners, write your thoughts about this experience, please!
Last edited by Optitron; 10-01-2010 at 04:09 AM.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
P.s. One more plus to the C63!
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
I also read that the active riding in С63 starts to warm the oil and coolant, as this engine has very little space and radiators to ensure sufficient cooling.
Have any of the owners of this face?
Have any of the owners of this face?
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Their are pros and cons for both cars. Overall the M3 is better balanced for the road and track, it handles better on twisty roads. The DCT is a better transmission as far as technology goes, but the AMG transmission is no slouch either. The AMG will kill a M3 all day in a straight line, it accellerates faster and harder, and the exhaust note is heavenly. The M3 will have a faster lap time on the track, due to it's different suspension geometry and handling. The AMG tends to roll on the corner, causing you to over correct it's understeer issues. And that means a slower lap times. The AMG is a handful, and a brutal beast. Alot of fun to drive at the limit, serious drifter car, you can easily hang the tail out. They are both great cars, the M3 tends to be overly laden with technology. The AMG definitely has a hp and torque advantage. As where the AMG, start it up and go. No owners manual needed. I love my car.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Their are pros and cons for both cars. Overall the M3 is better balanced for the road and track, it handles better on twisty roads. The DCT is a better transmission as far as technology goes, but the AMG transmission is no slouch either. The AMG will kill a M3 all day in a straight line, it accellerates faster and harder, and the exhaust note is heavenly. The M3 will have a faster lap time on the track, due to it's different suspension geometry and handling. The AMG tends to roll on the corner, causing you to over correct it's understeer issues. And that means a slower lap times. The AMG is a handful, and a brutal beast. Alot of fun to drive at the limit, serious drifter car, you can easily hang the tail out. They are both great cars, the M3 tends to be overly laden with technology. The AMG definitely has a hp and torque advantage. As where the AMG, start it up and go. No owners manual needed. I love my car.
There's your answer above...may as well shut the thread before the inevitable "ha M3, the C63 will kill a 458" brigade arrives...plenty of other info available on often-asked questions like this using the search function
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
Their are pros and cons for both cars. Overall the M3 is better balanced for the road and track, it handles better on twisty roads. The DCT is a better transmission as far as technology goes, but the AMG transmission is no slouch either. The AMG will kill a M3 all day in a straight line, it accellerates faster and harder, and the exhaust note is heavenly. The M3 will have a faster lap time on the track, due to it's different suspension geometry and handling. The AMG tends to roll on the corner, causing you to over correct it's understeer issues. And that means a slower lap times. The AMG is a handful, and a brutal beast. Alot of fun to drive at the limit, serious drifter car, you can easily hang the tail out. They are both great cars, the M3 tends to be overly laden with technology. The AMG definitely has a hp and torque advantage. As where the AMG, start it up and go. No owners manual needed. I love my car.
Thanks for the tip, I think about myself on these cars! Inquiring owners are not particularly fond of the track and riding limit how things cooled engine at the active driving, and whether the lack of brakes?
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Think of an M3 like a household hammer that will get the job done smoothly and swiftly. Think of a C63 like a sledgehammer that will Tear down an entire wall in all of its fury.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
Well, I do not know what sort of a DCT glitches, because here in Moscow, for example, goes E90 M3 in red, the owner of one of the first who set the compressor kit from ESS, now run for 35 000 km with a compressor, and power 700Hp. (pressure 0,6-0,7 PSI)! A DCT is still alive - it is not an indicator of reliability?
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well, I do not know what sort of a DCT glitches, because here in Moscow, for example, goes E90 M3 in red, the owner of one of the first who set the compressor kit from ESS, now run for 35 000 km with a compressor, and power 700Hp. (pressure 0,6-0,7 PSI)! A DCT is still alive - it is not an indicator of reliability?
I think an RS4 would be more suitable for Moscow's climate.
Are you planning on moding your future car?
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2009 C63, 2007 GL 450
There is one critical factor here considering where the OP lives. I assume Moscow/St.Petes? Ride quality should also be another consideration. Having spent a considerable amount of time in Russia I can tell you the road conditions can be somewhat lacking so I would not go for the PP on the 63. I would recommend you go for the standard 63 and then mod with ECU tune to get the extra HP and do other upgrades afterwards. Upgrade the rims for sure as OEM rims will not last more than 2-3 years on Russian roads with combination of salt/potholes etc.
That been said, once you get the car, take her for a full-out run from on the access road to Sheremetyevo from the ring-road (minus the militia or you could simply get a blue light and put on your roof)and you will be amazed with the car's performance.
That been said, once you get the car, take her for a full-out run from on the access road to Sheremetyevo from the ring-road (minus the militia or you could simply get a blue light and put on your roof)and you will be amazed with the car's performance.
#16
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: santa monica
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
99C43 05C55 06slk55
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Leningradka and MKAD
There are plenty of good highways in Moscow, the smaller roads are the ones that sometimes suck. The country-side, however, is hell for performance cars...
"There will always be plenty of fools and bad roads in Russia" - Nikolai Gogol.
There are plenty of good highways in Moscow, the smaller roads are the ones that sometimes suck. The country-side, however, is hell for performance cars...
"There will always be plenty of fools and bad roads in Russia" - Nikolai Gogol.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
The power output after doing simple mods like headers or a tune indicates how much more capable/superior the C63 engine is over the M-3.
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Cra and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Cra and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
ps Of course I will modify, ECU so exactly, but first driveway some time on the factory settings (six months or a year) to get used to a powerful rear-wheel drive at least!
There is one critical factor here considering where the OP lives. I assume Moscow/St.Petes? Ride quality should also be another consideration. Having spent a considerable amount of time in Russia I can tell you the road conditions can be somewhat lacking so I would not go for the PP on the 63. I would recommend you go for the standard 63 and then mod with ECU tune to get the extra HP and do other upgrades afterwards. Upgrade the rims for sure as OEM rims will not last more than 2-3 years on Russian roads with combination of salt/potholes etc.
That been said, once you get the car, take her for a full-out run from on the access road to Sheremetyevo from the ring-road (minus the militia or you could simply get a blue light and put on your roof)and you will be amazed with the car's performance.
That been said, once you get the car, take her for a full-out run from on the access road to Sheremetyevo from the ring-road (minus the militia or you could simply get a blue light and put on your roof)and you will be amazed with the car's performance.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
The power output after doing simple mods like headers or a tune indicates how much more capable/superior the C63 engine is over the M-3.
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Car and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Car and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
#22
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
The power output after doing simple mods like headers or a tune indicates how much more capable/superior the C63 engine is over the M-3.
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Cra and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
My summary is that the cars are differents and offer highs and lows. To me stuff like engine sound and torque tilts the scales in favor of the C63.
People talk too much about the M-3 but just grab this month Road and Track or Cra and Driver, the 2011 Mustang GT spanked the M-3 IN EVERY ASPECT
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Another way to look at it...
The M3 is the samurai sword to the C63's butcher knife.
Both are wonderful cars with 2 distinctly different personalities. Drive both and you'll know which one fits you.
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 63 AMG(My car) / MB C300 4matic AMG (Wife`s CAR)
There is a little problem, because in Moscow we have not test-drive on C63, avaliable only M3, of course I drove M3 once(about one hour), and to be honest, I was in a good way and was struck by the work of DCT in a bad sense of surprise stiffness by 19 wheels!
Last edited by Optitron; 10-01-2010 at 04:22 AM.