First dyno for my stock C63 - disappointing result??
There is only one dynojet in Australia, so it is best to compare your results against Australian C63's on Australian dynos.
This forum is generally USA centric, so the experiences of consumers from the USA reflect the experiences on USA fuel and generally on inertia dynos.
I accept that some consumers are beginning to use dyno dynamics dynos, but generally they are just refered to as a "heartbreaker" which tries to easily describe that they measure power and torque completely differently.
Your results can't really be compared easily to dynojet or mustang dynos unfortunately
All that really matters is the "area between the curves" between stock and modded when conducted on the same dyno.
Last edited by Powerchip; Nov 30, 2010 at 04:56 PM.
As others have stated it comes down to the way it drives rather than just a number.
Last edited by gyrex; Dec 1, 2010 at 01:24 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Can't wait to get the car back!!! I'm missing listening to that beautiful sound every morning...
Good luck with your car, youl love it.
h.
Good luck with your car, youl love it.
h.
How hard is it to pull the ECU?
We have found that like 90% of tuners, that different air fuel mapping is needed with headers, we believe that the ECU can nor adapt for headers.
You can ask BPS what similarities their tune has to the TechTec tune
Last edited by Powerchip; Dec 1, 2010 at 08:06 AM.




Anyway, I'll see how it goes. Hopefully I pick the car up today!
WOW!!!!! Damn you can feel the difference, it's a completely different animal now!!!
The best stock run was 348HP, with the cargraphic exhaust and ECU tune I'm now getting 430HP at the rears. If my maths is correct, that's 23.5% more power????
That's insane!!!
I'm uploading the dyno results and exhaust runs to youtube now.



