M3
I think this is our cars biggest competition, and just wanted to see what you guys think of the m3, and why you went with the c63 over the m3. I drove both before buying, and liked the c63 more, but i must admit it is a very good car...
just wanted to see what are your thoughts...
2) beats M3 stop light to stop lights
3) C63 has 3 to 4 options in total, whereas M3's options is more. More = $$$
4) MRSP on C63 is tasteful
5) Exhaust note on C63 is nicer than M3
6) Service in MB dealership actually treats you like a king than BMW dealership
I think this is our cars biggest competition, and just wanted to see what you guys think of the m3, and why you went with the c63 over the m3. I drove both before buying, and liked the c63 more, but i must admit it is a very good car...
just wanted to see what are your thoughts...

Took out my ML 63 later that night and saw a X5M and he didn't want to race me either. WTF...

If you are looking for a track car the M3 is your selection. Straight line performance the C63.
The C63 with a tune kills an M3 even if it has exhaust work done.
Its really just personal preference. I can see the appeal in both cars. Little less douche stigma in the C63 though.
Took out my ML 63 later that night and saw a X5M and he didn't want to race me either. WTF...
Jon syndrome. They know you will win so they don't wanna race.
Now the CTS-V on the other hand, there's your real C63 competition.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
and clk550 for m3 lol good one
however i can't wait to see whats in store for 2010 for both models. will the 63 be bi turbo or naturally aspirated?
and clk550 for m3 lol good one
however i can't wait to see whats in store for 2010 for both models. will the 63 be bi turbo or naturally aspirated?
and clk550 for m3 lol good one
however i can't wait to see whats in store for 2010 for both models. will the 63 be bi turbo or naturally aspirated?
The M however I hear will get some changes.

If you are looking for a track car the M3 is your selection. Straight line performance the C63.
The C63 with a tune kills an M3 even if it has exhaust work done.
Its really just personal preference. I can see the appeal in both cars. Little less douche stigma in the C63 though.
(see this thread if you don't get my comments:https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ne.html):zoom:
Honestly, with this whole Turbo deal, I wouldn't mind seeing a highly detuned (as in not making 550 hp with a ECU tune) 5.5 Liter in the C63.
+1
Torque is fun. Nothing really happens with the M3 engine until above 4500 RPM. Plus they are a little to common in LA, C63's are far fewer.
.
The C63's torque (and sounds) is terrific however the M3 is the better "Drivers car", its more dynamic and more rewarding when pushed hard.
If your interested in 0 - 60 then go the C63, if your after a more engaging driving experience go the M3.
On a side point, jsut do a search, its across this forum and M3 Post (each is bias due to owners generally choosing their car over the other).
I am a bimmer person since I was a kid. Ironically, I bought a C63 for the sound and the torque. I think the M3 is a better driver's car and you get more feedback on the steering. Also most important, the DCT. While we still have an automatic gearbox.
Oh well, It's my first AMG and I like it.
Last edited by lebreeze; Dec 4, 2010 at 12:54 PM.







