C63 getting 4.7L twin turbo engine 435hp?!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Barcelona, Ljubljana
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes C63 amg, Bmw X5,
C63 getting 4.7L twin turbo engine 435hp?!
I really dont believe it but according to this article it says it will be getting new twin turbo 4.7 liter engine and the c63 amg black series will use the all new 5.5L 563hp engine
heres the link :
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...s-mb-exec.html
heres the link :
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...s-mb-exec.html
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Can't really call a 4.7 liter TT engine making 435 HP a "cop out" engine. You can take comfort in knowing that the black series price will be a shocker. lol
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/ranks/veteran_marine_corp.png)
I will say this, don't believe everything you read. I was told by some people in the know, that AMG doesn't plan to replace the 6.2 liter NA engine in the C63. The 5.5 TT will not go into the C63 until all of the other models, have it. Like the S, SL, CL, CLS then the E, and lastly the C, but that will not occur until like 2013. I have already seen the 4.7 TT in the 2011 CL550, and it's essentually the same as the 5.5 but a smaller displacement. Again I will beleive it when I see it. But I love my 6.2 liter M156 motor. No replacement for displacement.
Last edited by Yuille36; 12-16-2010 at 11:54 AM.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
i agree that i love my 6.2 n/a motor . i'm happy that AMG is going to a smaller displacement forced induction motor because it will make my car more rare in the future . 563 hp in the black series is going to come with a hefty price tag . i can get the same power from my n/a at a fraction of the cost .
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
I would say a 4.7L TT has some potential.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
And, I'm sure you're right, the BS will be very, very expensive.
#9
Out Of Control!
I will say this, don't believe everything you read. I was told by some people in the know, that AMG doesn't plan to replace the 6.2 liter NA engine in the C63. The 5.5 TT will not go into the C63 until all of the other models, have it. Like the S, SL, CL, CLS then the E, and lastly the C, but that will not occur until like 2013. I have already seen the 4.7 TT in the 2011 CL550, and it's essentually the same as the 5.5 but a smaller displacement. Again I will beleive it when I see it. But I love my 6.2 liter M156 motor. No replacement for displacement.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
C63 Black Series + 564HP =
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Please let the pricing be under $80k!
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes
on
237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
I'm happy with a N/A 6.2 V8 any day...
#12
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 C63 with Eurocharged tune and charcoal delete
No new Black Series car will ever be under $100K in the USA. Yes it will be fast, and yes it will be expensive. Gotta say if it looks like those pics of the new C-Coupe that have been shown they can keep it. Even the old CLK Black looked better than that Accord look-alike.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
I will say this, don't believe everything you read. I was told by some people in the know, that AMG doesn't plan to replace the 6.2 liter NA engine in the C63. The 5.5 TT will not go into the C63 until all of the other models, have it. Like the S, SL, CL, CLS then the E, and lastly the C, but that will not occur until like 2013. I have already seen the 4.7 TT in the 2011 CL550, and it's essentually the same as the 5.5 but a smaller displacement. Again I will beleive it when I see it. But I love my 6.2 liter M156 motor. No replacement for displacement.
Personally, I prefer N/A engines because of the linear power delivery, throttle response and beautiful soundtrack. However, the future calls for more efficient high performance engines, and the 6.2 is hardly that.
#14
I think F/I is great. It can be so efficient.
And, I don't know why, but lately I've begun to appreciate smaller displacement engines with nasty little F/I setups that can handle lots of boost.
The M156 is amazing. But it feels as big as it is powerful. I'm beginning to appreciate a little bit smaller of a car than the C63. I would say less than 3700 lbs would be optimal for me.
I imagine the weights savings from a smaller displacement engine could really translate to a tighter and more nimble overall driving experience.
But, this engine is addicting. And I can't imagine anything topping it for a while.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
No new Black Series car will ever be under $100K in the USA. Yes it will be fast, and yes it will be expensive. Gotta say if it looks like those pics of the new C-Coupe that have been shown they can keep it. Even the old CLK Black looked better than that Accord look-alike.
#16
Member
Agreed.
I think F/I is great. It can be so efficient.
And, I don't know why, but lately I've begun to appreciate smaller displacement engines with nasty little F/I setups that can handle lots of boost.
The M156 is amazing. But it feels as big as it is powerful. I'm beginning to appreciate a little bit smaller of a car than the C63. I would say less than 3700 lbs would be optimal for me.
I imagine the weights savings from a smaller displacement engine could really translate to a tighter and more nimble overall driving experience.
But, this engine is addicting. And I can't imagine anything topping it for a while.
I think F/I is great. It can be so efficient.
And, I don't know why, but lately I've begun to appreciate smaller displacement engines with nasty little F/I setups that can handle lots of boost.
The M156 is amazing. But it feels as big as it is powerful. I'm beginning to appreciate a little bit smaller of a car than the C63. I would say less than 3700 lbs would be optimal for me.
I imagine the weights savings from a smaller displacement engine could really translate to a tighter and more nimble overall driving experience.
But, this engine is addicting. And I can't imagine anything topping it for a while.
I highly doubt the new engine will be any lighter. The smaller displacement only mean smaller bore and/or shorter stroke. It does not mean the block or the heads will be any smaller. In my opinion, the new TT engine will likely be heavier than the 6.2 even if at 4.7 liters. FI blocks and rotating assemblies are over built and heavier than similar NA setups. Also, the new engine will have more equipment to support it: Direct injection, liquid intercooling systems (very heavy), and of course two turbo chargers with supporting equipment.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
I highly doubt the new engine will be any lighter. The smaller displacement only mean smaller bore and/or shorter stroke. It does not mean the block or the heads will be any smaller. In my opinion, the new TT engine will likely be heavier than the 6.2 even if at 4.7 liters. FI blocks and rotating assemblies are over built and heavier than similar NA setups. Also, the new engine will have more equipment to support it: Direct injection, liquid intercooling systems (very heavy), and of course two turbo chargers with supporting equipment.
up the boost n all is go sir
Need i name a few examples?
- v12 biturbo benz
- 997 turbo & GT2
- GTR
- BMW 335, X6m/X5
- Audi RS6
- B Veron
All are monsters when tuned, except for the last one, because it has Demi god status
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#18
Member
Obviously factory FI cars can be monsters. I made no statement to the contrary. In fact, I am quite sure that the new MB TT V8 will be a monster and a tuner’s dream. I would not be surprised one bit, if the new 63 AMGs set new records for AMGs in a fairly short period of time.
I was merely pointing out that Sonny’s idea that the new smaller displacement TT V8 would be lighter than the 6.2 is unfounded and most likely false.
I was merely pointing out that Sonny’s idea that the new smaller displacement TT V8 would be lighter than the 6.2 is unfounded and most likely false.
#19
Former Vendor of MBWorld
What I dont get is why call it a 63 then? A 4.7L TT will have some real nice power potential. If modding is as easy as other TT cars... Software, downpipes, exhaust and intake should make for one very strong car. If you want to talk turbo upgrades.That might be a bit harder, as Mercedes has always cast the manifold into the turbos. Just speculation, I would think to do a turbo upgrade would be expensive. You would essentially have to make a header and then add an aftermarket turbo. That will be pricey. If you can do all that? You will have one major beast on your hands. It will be interesting to see non the less.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
what i want to know is how can I tell if the new 2011 S/SL/CLS 63 5.5TT are 6.3s or 5.5TT without knowing all the design changes (I would recognize the CLS), but the others.........? trapezoid exhaust tips x 4? the swoosh boost as it blows by?
OMG my head hurts this is so confusing
OMG my head hurts this is so confusing
Last edited by GHAZAN; 12-16-2010 at 06:31 PM.
#21
Obviously factory FI cars can be monsters. I made no statement to the contrary. In fact, I am quite sure that the new MB TT V8 will be a monster and a tuner’s dream. I would not be surprised one bit, if the new 63 AMGs set new records for AMGs in a fairly short period of time.
I was merely pointing out that Sonny’s idea that the new smaller displacement TT V8 would be lighter than the 6.2 is unfounded and most likely false.
I was merely pointing out that Sonny’s idea that the new smaller displacement TT V8 would be lighter than the 6.2 is unfounded and most likely false.
#22
What I dont get is why call it a 63 then? A 4.7L TT will have some real nice power potential. If modding is as easy as other TT cars... Software, downpipes, exhaust and intake should make for one very strong car. If you want to talk turbo upgrades.That might be a bit harder, as Mercedes has always cast the manifold into the turbos. Just speculation, I would think to do a turbo upgrade would be expensive. You would essentially have to make a header and then add an aftermarket turbo. That will be pricey. If you can do all that? You will have one major beast on your hands. It will be interesting to see non the less.
http://www.granatellimotorsports.com...Kit-557-0.html
$7,500-9K will get you an excellent TT system with tons of potential.
Why couldn't a similar setup be built for the new TT 63's at a similar price point? Obviously, taking into account the Mercedes tax, of course.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
Edit: I see what you're saying now, because even in this TT kit, the stock exhaust manifolds are used. So, I can see how it would get pricey for sure. But, maybe a 3-4K more because custom manifold(s) may have to be built. Still seems pretty feasible.
Last edited by SonnyakaPig; 12-16-2010 at 06:44 PM.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
I highly doubt the new engine will be any lighter. The smaller displacement only mean smaller bore and/or shorter stroke. It does not mean the block or the heads will be any smaller. In my opinion, the new TT engine will likely be heavier than the 6.2 even if at 4.7 liters. FI blocks and rotating assemblies are over built and heavier than similar NA setups. Also, the new engine will have more equipment to support it: Direct injection, liquid intercooling systems (very heavy), and of course two turbo chargers with supporting equipment.
#24
Super Moderator
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!