_AMG_

Ok Ill be the first to claim it... 480-500hp on Dyno Dynamics.
Gentleman place your bets!!

SonnyakaPig

I'll play: 470 rwhp.

xtyper

Based on Jeremy's last dyno development results, I'm betting the headers add another 40whp, bringing him up from 440whp to 480whp. Knowing some other cars that have run on his low-reading dyno at that power level and what their track results were, I think we may have another N/A C63 in the 10's soon.

SonnyakaPig

Based on what I've seen so far for the C63, this Dyno Dynamics doesn't seem like it's reading low.

My car baselined (stock) on a Mustang dyno at 348 rwhp with 91 octane. Jeremy's baseline is more than that on 91 octane. And I would say Jeremy's baseline seems more realistic than mine. I can't imagine my car loses more than 20% to the rear wheels.

Even Money

LOL....I couldn't care less if it dyno'd 600 whp. Let's see what it'll do down the 1/4.

_AMG_

+1
I have high hopes for Jeremy's car getting in the 10's. All the guys over on the east coast are putting up big 1/4 mile times. (Mthis, Dodger63, DadsC63, etc...) so we need someone to represent the west coast, and I think he is the man for the job.

Staff@RPM

I agree, Jeremy sounds like the perfect candidate and I am sure he will have a 10 second beast. It'll be really good to have some more cars in the 10. Keep everyone motivated and going faster.

Our first East coast track day for the new season is coming up, unfortunately this snow has kept us from testing new things. You West coast guys have the advantage on us this winter with that weather you guys have. Hopefully we should have some good weather on February 18. I look forward to meeting Jeremy and everyone else there, bring your jackets.

dodger63

I'm sure jeremy will do it.. I think its more impressive if a paying customer does it.. So come on guys buy the products and go get to the track

dodger63

Are you guys serious about dyno numbers. There useless. You can make them better or worse at will.,,

SonnyakaPig

I don't believe dyno numbers are useless. They are proving to be less consistent throughout the world, but they still serve as a strong indicator of a car's power level.

Assuming that the dyno operator is only trying to make the numbers as accurate as possible, the dyno results can be helpful.

I was having a real problem with the tune in my last car when I had a Vortech blower installed. I didn't know how bad of a problem it was until I put the car on the dyno and realized that the blower was only making 60 rwhp and 50 rwtq. That was my first clue that the tune was off by a long shot.

It's true that dynos can vary quite a bit, but we basically know what kind of power levels various mods make on the C63 platform.

In this case, with Gintani's new C63 headers, it will be vary interesting to see the power increase from the exhaust/tune setup.

Ultimately, we can't deny the fact that dynos are inconsistent from one shop to the next. But, when you have a dyno like Gintani's Dyno Dynamics showing very "normal" numbers for Jeremy's C63, you can look to the dyno numbers and have some idea about how fast the car will run.

Personally, I don't have the strongest urge to put my car on the dyno because it should make roughly the same power as any other 91-octane, OE-tune only car with ROW's and filters.

I'm just responding because I used to be all about the dyno numbers and admittedly, it was this forum and even you in a big way that influenced my current views on dynos, but I wouldn't feel comfortable walking into a Dyno Dynamics company headerquarters and telling them, "your tool is pointless."

AMMO1000hp

^ well said. Another thing to keep in mind is dynos are just a tool to see if any changes in power has been made or lost when changing your setup(using the same dyno preferably on the same day). That's all I really care about using a dyno at least.

FastDonzi

amen brother.at least some folk seem to see through the smoke.good work with that beast you have there dodger