C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63 vs Porsche 911

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-08-2011, 09:20 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
bellemastiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
I just went from a 911 S PDK to my P30 C63.

I am surprised you think the 911 ride is more comfortable? I had the opposite thought (and the P30 suspension is supposed to be the "worst" of the C63 suspension setups, right?)

The C63 wins the drag race,
The 911 wins the autocross (and probably road race),
Both cars have status (911 might win this I suppose, though the C63 is very rare comparatively),
The 911 has slightly better interior build quality,
The C63 has a more comfortable interior for cruising / trips,
The C63 is much louder exhaust (stock),
The C63 fits my Mastiff in the backseat.

C63 wins!
Old 06-08-2011, 09:23 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
khmergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
2011 P31 C63 2015 CLA45
Lol on your last point.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:32 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
I had an 05 997 C2S, I'll add that the C63 has a damn nice steering wheel and the stock sport seats are nice too. Those are pricey upgrades on a 997.
Old 06-08-2011, 09:41 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
IAA-C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by bellemastiff
I am surprised you think the 911 ride is more comfortable? I had the opposite thought (and the P30 suspension is supposed to be the "worst" of the C63 suspension setups, right?)
Not sure why we differ on this. Maybe it depends on road quality? Or the particular 911 model I drove?

On smooth roads, I find both cars to ride perfectly well. But on really rough patches, the 911 seems to soak them up better than the C63.

That said, I much prefer a firm ride which provides good handling and enables me to feel the grain of the road, and I've gotten used to the ride of the C63, to the extent that it now feels pretty much "normal" to me. Since my C63 is in the shop, I drove my old 01 E320 today, and it feels unbearably floaty, like I'm piloting a boat.
Old 06-08-2011, 10:06 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Phin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marina Del Rey,Ca.
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
06' BMW M3
...lol...apples and oranges.....one is a high performance sports car....the other is a 4-door high performance sedan...they are not competitors...of course this is only my opinion...not hating boys...it's amazing what a big engine will do for you... covers up some "short comings"...
Old 06-08-2011, 10:18 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
melmanc55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
My brother had an 07 911S...I wouldn't think twice about trading my C63 for it. There is just something special about a 911. I've owned two (my brother has owned 4 and my dad 1) and they are great cars. They just have a different feel to them. I love AMG...but whoever said they are comparing apples and oranges is right. They are just not as practical for me right now.....
Old 06-08-2011, 10:23 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
Originally Posted by Jean Valjean
I don't think the OP is comparing the C63 to a 911Turbo, but rather a 911 S. It's true the turbo will Kill the C63 in all performance categories. It's also about $50K more. I do believe comparing the C63 to the base and S 996 and 997 911's is a fair comparison. The Turbo is a monster...with the ability to outperform some Ferraris and Lambos that are double it's price. You've got a great set of vehicles!
I'm comparing it to a 997.2 S with 385hp and about 600 less lbs weight. The manufacturers 0-60 is 4.5 for the Porsche and 4.4 for the C63. That's about as close it's going to get performance wise for the C63 (which is the top of it's class). The weight disadvantage alone dooms the C63 on any track but a drag strip. Yes the Porsche cost more, they always do as they don't have the economy of scale the MBZ has building the C63 on the mass produced C chassis. The comparison is basically apples to oranges. The C63 is an adaptation of the basic entry level C class MBZ taken to the extremes of its capabilities and to still be marketable. The Porsche is a purpose built road car with major compromises in comfort and utility sacrificed on the alter of performance. I think both cars are fantastic. While they are both very high performance, they are built to serve different purposes. I've spent 10 years with three AMG C classes and three 911's. Bottom line, you need to own one of each at the same time to truly achieve nirvana.

Last edited by DuaneC63; 06-09-2011 at 01:13 AM.
Old 06-08-2011, 10:25 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
Originally Posted by IAA-C63
Not sure why we differ on this. Maybe it depends on road quality? Or the particular 911 model I drove?

On smooth roads, I find both cars to ride perfectly well. But on really rough patches, the 911 seems to soak them up better than the C63.

That said, I much prefer a firm ride which provides good handling and enables me to feel the grain of the road, and I've gotten used to the ride of the C63, to the extent that it now feels pretty much "normal" to me. Since my C63 is in the shop, I drove my old 01 E320 today, and it feels unbearably floaty, like I'm piloting a boat.
That's an usual observation. While Porsche have grown more road compliant in recent years, they still have a shorter wheel base and a stiffer suspension. For a long trip, I'd take my C63 every time.
Old 06-08-2011, 10:38 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
melmanc55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
The manufacturers 0-60 is 4.5 for the Porsche and 4.4 for the C63. That's about as close it's going to get performance wise for the C63
Yep all done with a 3.8 liter flat six. Amazing.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:39 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Philipangoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Tesla 3, E30, CayenneS
Guys,

PDK was not an available option on 911's until 2009 model. So for comparisons sake he really is talking about porsche tiptronic vs amg automatic.

I had an 07 911 C4 and I would have to agree with you on most of the points. The 911 was definitely more comfortable and "refined" feeling. I also miss stick shift, but I have my old beater E30 for that now

You just can't beat the ole MB V8 power.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:41 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
IAA-C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by DuaneC63
I comparing it to a 997.2 S with 385hp and about 600 less lbs weight. The manufacturers 0-60 is 4.5 for the Porsche and 4.4 for the C63. That's about as close it's going to get performance wise for the C63 (which is the top of it's class). The weight disadvantage alone dooms the C63 on any track but a drag strip. Yes the Porsche cost more, they always do as they don't have the economy of scale the MBZ has building the C63 on the mass produced C chassis. The comparison is basically apples to oranges. The C63 is an adaptation of the basic entry level C class MBZ taken to the extremes of its capabilities and to still be marketable. The Porsche is a purpose built road car with major compromises in comfort and utility sacrificed on the alter of performance. I think both cars are fantastic. While they are both very high performance, they are built to serve different purposes. I've spent 10 years with three AMG C classes and three 911's. Bottom line, you need to own one of each at the same time to truly achieve nirvana.
I recall a 0-60 of about 4.7 for this particular Carrera 4S with the tiptronic.

You're right that having both the 911 and C63 would be really nice, which is why I'm steering my wife that way. The C63 has made me somewhat performance crazed, so I'm using the excuse of her "needing" another car as a way for me to get another car for myself, for the sake of variety. She leans towards a convertible, so an option is the M3. But my heart cries for a Porsche, and we need a back seat at least good enough for a kid on local trips, hence the 911 option. We're going to try at least two other variants of the 911, and I'm very curious to see how they compare with the one we already tried.

As far as comparisons in general, I don't think they need to be limited to cars designed for the same specific market. Sometimes comparisons are just interesting to better understand the cars being compared. Plus, sometimes our needs/wants are flexible (eg, just want a fun car), in which case a broad range of cars can reasonably be compared for cross-shopping (hence the C63 vs. GT-R, Jaguar, and RS8 threads).
Old 06-09-2011, 01:15 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
Originally Posted by Philipangoo
Guys,

PDK was not an available option on 911's until 2009 model. So for comparisons sake he really is talking about porsche tiptronic vs amg automatic.

I had an 07 911 C4 and I would have to agree with you on most of the points. The 911 was definitely more comfortable and "refined" feeling. I also miss stick shift, but I have my old beater E30 for that now

You just can't beat the ole MB V8 power.

The number I quoted for the 0-60 is with a manual for the Porsche. Throw in the PDK with launch control and the comparison just gets worse for the AMG.
Old 06-09-2011, 01:21 AM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
[QUOTE=IAA-C63;4710056]I recall a 0-60 of about 4.7 for this particular Carrera 4S with the tiptronic.

You're right that having both the 911 and C63 would be really nice, which is why I'm steering my wife that way. The C63 has made me somewhat performance crazed, so I'm using the excuse of her "needing" another car as a way for me to get another car for myself, for the sake of variety. She leans towards a convertible, so an option is the M3. But my heart cries for a Porsche, and we need a back seat at least good enough for a kid on local trips, hence the 911 option. We're going to try at least two other variants of the 911, and I'm very curious to see how they compare with the one we already tried.

If you need a back seat there are limitations. The retractable hard top on the M3 is hard to beat. The M3 has a real back seat, the Porsche has some pads glued to the floor with a couple of DOT approved back rests. They work real good if you under six years old. I would have suggested the CLK55, which is a little demon, but no back seat. In your situation why don't you just give her the C63 a find a Porsche you like for yourself.

Last edited by DuaneC63; 06-09-2011 at 01:29 AM.
Old 06-09-2011, 06:17 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
IAA-C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by DuaneC63
The number I quoted for the 0-60 is with a manual for the Porsche. Throw in the PDK with launch control and the comparison just gets worse for the AMG.
I got the 4.7 number from the Porsche salesman, and it seems to match what's online:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_997

http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/91...-4s-cabriolet/
Old 06-09-2011, 06:22 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
IAA-C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
[QUOTE=DuaneC63;4710176]
Originally Posted by IAA-C63
If you need a back seat there are limitations. The retractable hard top on the M3 is hard to beat. The M3 has a real back seat, the Porsche has some pads glued to the floor with a couple of DOT approved back rests. They work real good if you under six years old. I would have suggested the CLK55, which is a little demon, but no back seat. In your situation why don't you just give her the C63 a find a Porsche you like for yourself.
She wouldn't accept the C63 as her primary car, plus the C63 is perfect for me as my primary car because I need something which isn't too flashy (for business). And even setting practicality aside, if I could drive only one car, it would probably be the C63.
Old 04-02-2016, 09:01 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
malahhaor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ChiTown
Posts: 1,097
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 Carrera4
hi all, i realize that this is a very old thread but i am hopping someone may still follow and shed some light. I don't want to start a new thread.

I currently drive a Carrera 997 as my DD and i'm looking to upgrade to something a touch bigger. was thinking to get a new C300 sport or bmw 328i. The handling is going to be ok but im afraid it will be too boring.
I started to look at AMGs in my price range and w204 came up. I never gave w204 a second look as the interior center console just rubs me the wrong way, but for performance i might be able to overlook it
so my real questions is in the handling of the C63. Going from Carrera AWD grip i'm a little concerned that the way i drive sometimes i might lose the rear end all the time.
Sometimes i like to do a passionate corner when traffic permits, or trying to quickly slip from one lane to the other in slow traffic, or make that left corner slightly hasty because traffic just wont stop and you need to squeeze in. Carrera always has grip and just goes, and very sharp steering that i love. I've never driven such a light car with so much power as the C amg. Do you guys think i would have trouble getting good grip if i'm throttle happy at such low speeds? Can i fit 285s in the back to help traction?

Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Old 04-02-2016, 09:18 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
Porsche vs C63

[QUOTE=malahhaor;6758293]hi all, i realize that this is a very old thread but i am hopping someone may still follow and shed some light. I don't want to start a new thread.

I currently drive a Carrera 997 as my DD and i'm looking to upgrade to something a touch bigger. was thinking to get a new C300 sport or bmw 328i. The handling is going to be ok but im afraid it will be too boring.
I started to look at AMGs in my price range and w204 came up. I never gave w204 a second look as the interior center console just rubs me the wrong way, but for performance i might be able to overlook it
so my real questions is in the handling of the C63. Going from Carrera AWD grip i'm a little concerned that the way i drive sometimes i might lose the rear end all the time.
Sometimes i like to do a passionate corner when traffic permits, or trying to quickly slip from one lane to the other in slow traffic, or make that left corner slightly hasty because traffic just wont stop and you need to squeeze in. Carrera always has grip and just goes, and very sharp steering that i love. I've never driven such a light car with so much power as the C amg. Do you guys think i would have trouble getting good grip if i'm throttle happy at such low speeds? Can i fit 285s in the back to help traction?

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

A non turbo Porsche will out handle a C63 any time. But a tuned C63 will out run most non-turbo Porsches. As far as improving handling on a C63, wider rear tires are a problem looking for an answer. 285 will rub unless you put so much neg camber in they wear out in 5k. Put in adjustable coil overs, (drop it about a good inch or so) adjustable upper rear links (to fix the too much neg camber) and a Quafe dif.
Old 04-02-2016, 09:22 PM
  #43  
Member
 
Jean Valjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1997 Ferrari F355 Berlinetta, 2014 Mercedes Benz ML 350, 2008 MB C63 AMG (deceased), 2009 MB C63 AMG
I put 275's on my 2009 w204 C63 AMG, and combined with the LSD option, grip is very good. I previously used to have a 2008 C63 without LSD and it was very easy to oversteer, which made it a very "fun" car but likely not up to your preferred level of grip on a 997. I will be selling my 2009 with 54k miles within the next month or so.
Old 04-02-2016, 11:22 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
malahhaor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ChiTown
Posts: 1,097
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 Carrera4
actually the car im looking at atm has the development pkg. if im not mistaken it has the LSD.

I do not believe i would drop the car any lower. it already sits low and im not a big fan of dropped look.
Im assuming that 275s with LSD will help but wont be carrera territory?


Edit: just did some extra research. Dev pkg is P31 with red brakes, CF and light engine parts not P30 with LSD and sport suspension. Right?

Last edited by malahhaor; 04-02-2016 at 11:33 PM.
Old 04-03-2016, 10:24 AM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,509
Received 432 Likes on 355 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
If you really want to ensure it has a LSD you will need the window sticker or the Data Card from the dealer or Valvestud here online. Canadian cars with APX package came with a LSD from 2012 + I believe.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 vs Porsche 911



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 PM.