C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

whats better, a C63 or a BMW M5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 12:37 AM
  #26  
driftster's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
325,TSX,F150,Deville ask
Originally Posted by _AMG_
What kind of medication are you on?
The M3 is a great car but you can not compare the sound to a C63 (stock vs stock).
Try to get an M3 to sound like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWuNu...eature=related
or this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi2BT...el_video_title
Some people in the world like the sound of a high revving sports car to that of the German "interpretation" of American muscle

like this for ex.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYh1P...tailpage#t=85s

There's a nice wholesome sound to come from a high revving sports car that begs to not sound quite so "mechanical".....Only comparison i can see these days is current day lamborghinis...They don't really sound lamborghini anymore...but what germany thinks lamborghini's sound like.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 12:49 AM
  #27  
lowpost's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 31
From: Oakland
2018 E43 | 2017 GLS450 | 2004 CLK 500
I don't know many people who can't tell the difference between an AMG or an M car to it's counterpart.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:01 AM
  #28  
Jae Duk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Palos Verdes
'09 C63
Op = epic failure.

I think op should just get an M5 since it seems image is all that matters. The "average" crowd will know what an M3 or M5 is, but they will not know what AMG is.

Before me, my gf didn't know what an AMG was, but she knew/heard of the M3 and M5. If image is that important why bother even asking us? Seems like you got your mind made up.

And please listen to a C63 before criticizing it doesn't roar.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:03 AM
  #29  
AMG X's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 138
Likes: 1
From: SF Bay Area
w211, w221, w220, e46
Originally Posted by lamonsas
thats what i was looking for, so your saying the M5 has alot of problems and is a terrible car overall which requires losts of maintenance aswell, is the C63 the same way? does it require lots of maintenance?

im asking for like daily use you know, im not a racer or anything, im looking for a great monster of a car that gets people's attention because of how great it is, thats what an M5 does to me when i see it in the street, that noise.. oh god. but ur saying the transmission in it sucks so.. i dont know now.
The M5 will probably require a bit more work to keep it running well. But honestly, if you won't have a warranty and/or the funds, then it isn't really a good idea to get either one. If that is how you feel about the M5, then maybe you should go for it but with a stick shift (if you can live with one daily and handle a clutch).

Last edited by AMG X; Jul 27, 2011 at 04:50 AM.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:30 AM
  #30  
enochroot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
2016 G550
Originally Posted by lamonsas
does the C63 make loud noises at low revs too or you need to go above 3k/4k to hear the loud noise? on the BMW M3/M5 you hear the loud noise even when the car is idle almost as in waiting in a red light and as soon as they press the pedal , even slightly you hear the roar.

i heared C63s but their roar isnt very loud.

what DD GT3 said about the m5's tranny threw me off though.

and the car will be for fun you know man, like weekend and such. im not taking any road trips or anything
LOUD NOISES

Dude you are so high, I want what you got.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 02:27 AM
  #31  
SMP's Avatar
SMP
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 21
CLK63 Black Series
Originally Posted by DD GT3 RD
there is no better or worse, its subjective. Better for what? racing, drag, comfort, daily use?

only thing I can say is that the SMG tranny in the e60 M5 is TERRIBLE, SLOW, JERKY, Sucks for daily use and has problems often.



I bought my M6 new a little over 2 years ago. I use it as a daily driver and had not one problem with it. Even if it would grenade tomorrow, it's got a 4/50 warranty .

In regards to the SMG, some people don't like it because they think it's jerky. This is my second BMW with the SMG (had an E46 M3 for almost 3 years), and personally love that transmission. If you know how to drive a manual transmission smooth, the SMG will not be a problem. As for being "slow", it's lightning quick compared to my CLK's auto box. In the most aggressive setting, as soon as you pull on the paddle, that gear is in. As you know, that's not the case with the 7G

To OP: Both cars are great. Both cars sound great as well. They have totally different engine characteristics though. One has torque right above idle, where the other one comes REALLY alive at 5500 rpm. One is more of an effort to extract power from, the other quit effortlessly.

Last edited by SMP; Jul 28, 2011 at 07:23 AM.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 02:56 AM
  #32  
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
'11 C63 w/ P31
^ true, maybe I havent spent enough time with it but I would take a manual or the 7G over it. Yes the 7G is NOT fast either, but very smooth.

I had 2 friends that had M5's and they had many issues with the tranny. Im sure there are cases of no probs to, just sharing what I have seen.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 04:31 AM
  #33  
King335i's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
CTS-V Coupe
I think the C63 has a more menacing presence, while the M5 is somewhat of a sleeper.

As far as doubting BMW's twin-turbo tech, don't. At first BMW had some fairly minor issues with their N54, all of which were fixed under BMW's great warranty program. The new F10 M5 will be a beast, and if I'm not mistaken the new M5 does not actually have a twin-turbo setup, it is a single twin-scroll turbo.

Between the '12 C63 and the F10 M5, that's a tough one. May come down to how much raw performance numbers and interior refinement matter to you.
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 07:24 AM
  #34  
jacob502's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by dodger63
Dude if you hang out with guys that can't tell a c300 from a c63, please please buy a m5..
+1...I'm getting sick of these threads that compare the C63 with a dumb BMW. Do you actually think someone would prefer a BMW over a C63 in a C63 forum???
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #35  
CPBRI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
From: Texas
E63 S
Originally Posted by lamonsas
it looks like an old men's guy.


???

Old Jul 27, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #36  
tasho3's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 22
From: Westmont, IL
2014 C63 Sedan
Originally Posted by AMG X
I don't know why people buy a performance marque only for the namesake or what others think of it. I stress this again, buy what you want. You know what you drive and that's all that matters, not what someone else thinks. The only way to know which one drives better is for you to get behind the wheel of both and compare them, your opinion of handling might differ than someone else's
Couldn't agree with you more!!!
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 11:15 AM
  #37  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
I think the OP should get an ordinary car for now, and hold on getting something like a C63 or M5 until his criteria for choosing are more mature. Sorry if this sounds harsh, but that's my opinion ...
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #38  
chawkins2001's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 67
From: Atlanta
2006 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by lamonsas
does the C63 make loud noises at low revs too or you need to go above 3k/4k to hear the loud noise? on the BMW M3/M5 you hear the loud noise even when the car is idle almost as in waiting in a red light and as soon as they press the pedal , even slightly you hear the roar.

i heared C63s but their roar isnt very loud.

what DD GT3 said about the m5's tranny threw me off though.

and the car will be for fun you know man, like weekend and such. im not taking any road trips or anything
What a tool
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #39  
j bro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
2009 C63 ///Amg
Originally Posted by lamonsas

the one thing im scared of on the C63 is that it looks like a C300 and people might think i have a C300 rather a C63 which costs twice as much.
not sure what you are talking about honestly. first off a c63 is much more recognizable than a c300 vs an m5 from a 535.

the c63 has different rims a different from bumper along with a different hood and headlights, and it also has a quad exhaust system in the back which produces a sound which no one could mistake for a c300.

And as with the m5 unless I see the quad exhaust in the back i find it very hard to tell an m5 apart from a regular 5 series, there dont seem to me like they did any other body changes to it
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 12:19 PM
  #40  
stiklr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: South Elgin, IL
2005 E55 Black
OP should go buy a Lexus so people know he bought a prestigious brand of car and leave the C63 and M5 for real car enthusiasts who could careless about how the average person perceives the car. Both cars are bad a$$ so buy the one that feels the best on your test drive. I'll take a C63 for the low end torque alone. 8500 rpms on the street is fun but not too many opps to do so on a daily basis.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #41  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
Originally Posted by stiklr
OP should go buy a Lexus so people know he bought a prestigious brand of car and leave the C63 and M5 for real car enthusiasts who could careless about how the average person perceives the car. Both cars are bad a$$ so buy the one that feels the best on your test drive. I'll take a C63 for the low end torque alone. 8500 rpms on the street is fun but not too many opps to do so on a daily basis.
Now there's a post in the 63 section that I can agree with

PS: Infinity would float his boat as well I suspect.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 12:54 PM
  #42  
Yuille36's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Marine Corps
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 532
From: Alexandria, VA
07 E63 AMG, 10 C63 AMG, 07 E63 Designo, 07 E350, 09 C300, 07 C230
This thread is like comparing apples to oranges, it's open to one's own interpretation.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #43  
j bro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
2009 C63 ///Amg
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
What a tool
+1 lol
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:49 PM
  #44  
bigben320e's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 9
From: Blasting off!
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
The main problem with this thread is he started off asking a comparison of the C63 vs M5 which are not even the same level/class of car.

Next, he seems more concerned about what other people think than state what HE thinks and wants out of a car.

Finally, he makes a statement about the "roar" of the C63 and M5 which seems rather bogus to most of us that have driven/heard both of said vehicles and know better.

Therefore I conclude...

To the OP, what you should do is examine why do you care about what others think, what YOU want out of a car, and then make your choice. No one can tell you what you asked. Seems like if you could buy either of these cars, you would have the wherewithal to make an intelligent decision on your own as well.

It's almost like asking which woman should I pick, the one with the d cups or c cups...no one can make that decision for me.

Old Jul 27, 2011 | 01:50 PM
  #45  
bigben320e's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 9
From: Blasting off!
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
What a tool
This. +2
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #46  
danlnyc's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles
04 CL55 (sold), 2012 CLS550 (sold), 2014 S550 (sold), 2015 ES300H (DAILY)
your friends are retarded if they cant tell a C300 from a C63. The difference in sound, power, looks, and everything is completely obvious. I can spot a C63 from a mile away...
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 04:31 PM
  #47  
Cylinder Head's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by DD GT3 RD
there is no better or worse, its subjective. Better for what? racing, drag, comfort, daily use?

only thing I can say is that the SMG tranny in the e60 M5 is TERRIBLE, SLOW, JERKY, Sucks for daily use and has problems often.
As someone who just sold their E60 M5 I can say you're wrong on 2 counts. I put 100k miles on my car driving to and from work (50 miles away from my home at the time) and regularly drove it in NYC. It was a brilliant transmission for what it was.

50ms shifts are FASTER than any Ferrari SMG at the time so I don't know where you're getting slow from.

My stock clutch went at 90k miles. I had an SMG pump go at 70k miles. Those are not problems I'd describe as "often".

Yes it was jerky as hell and I loved it.

Back on Topic, the cars are apples and oranges.
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 04:51 PM
  #48  
bushburninc63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 2
2009 c63, 2010 E63
You guys are being trolled
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #49  
AMG-010's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 666
Likes: 7
From: Australia
2017 AMG C43
I had an E60 M5 before my C63 and it was an awesome car. I think the seats are better in the M5 and is a little more comfortable to drive, it is almost twice the price of a C63 new in Australia though. M5 is more comparable to an E63 OR CLS63.

whats better, a C63 or a BMW M5?-m5boardbris8lowres.jpg

whats better, a C63 or a BMW M5?-m5boardbris10lowres.jpg
Old Jul 27, 2011 | 07:41 PM
  #50  
lamonsas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
2011 C300
what i want from the car is for it to be powerful and a great overall car, i was only making the comments about the M5 to open a discussion, from what i think it has a loader roar and overall sound.

about the C63, i wanted to know if it makes the roaring in low rpms (1-2k) ?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE