180F Thermostat and Thermal intake gasket worth it?
Last edited by d7om63; Oct 10, 2016 at 09:03 PM.








I had thoughts if it this would or could work pre cats....
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
He called back and said he does not think it will work for my car as it does not have what looks like an activator on the top of the OEM thermostat. Anyone knows if there was a change on the FL cars?
He called back and said he does not think it will work for my car as it does not have what looks like an activator on the top of the OEM thermostat. Anyone knows if there was a change on the FL cars?




Did you even notice much from it or it a waste of time and hassle?




If it's a track only car and doesn't require glycol, MoCOOL or Water Wetter would be far more beneficial. A lower tempt thermostat is basically a band-aid solution for some other problem that should be addressed.
Tons of info available on the internes.
For example: http://www.tuneruniversity.com/blog/...the-advantage/




It could actually end up being worse overall. You can't make a blanket statement like you just did without factoring all the variables.
Coolant temp is NOT directly coupled to oil temp. If coolant temp is already good, don't mess with it.




i.e, reducing intake air temps has been shown to reduce oil temps (see: radiator block off plate).
Cooler water temps, which cools the engine through which oil also flows, has a knock-on effect.
I’m not going to get into a debate on this, there’s plenty of data out there already to support.
My "opinion" is based on research and years of racing experience on other platforms. This platform for racing is relatively new to me, if you have the data to back up your claims that would be excellent.
You state cooler water temps blah blah this that, if it's already within spec, making it cooler has absolutely zero advantage.
If a module in a multi module system is operating within spec. There is no need to augment it.






