C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Can't beat the pesky Viper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 02:48 AM
  #26  
Member
 
SL63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c63 AMG
get some juice http://youtu.be/apOY03sCAF0?hd=1
Old 02-15-2012, 07:20 AM
  #27  
Member
 
bmstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
clk63 black series
Originally Posted by SL63AMG
do you think that V was running 125 shot with no other mods btw (to reinforce engine I mean)?
Old 02-15-2012, 12:04 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
I wouldn't be disappointed. You are running with what is considered to be a super car in a sedan. Viper's at any gen are no slouches.

My friend had a 97 GTS coupe, with some bolt ons it was a solid 11 second car trapping over 123mph. I am sure your friend's viper with the mods is trapping the same.
Old 02-15-2012, 12:16 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GHAZAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norte America
Posts: 1,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MBUSA
Originally Posted by bmstyle
do you think that V was running 125 shot with no other mods btw (to reinforce engine I mean)?
it handles 100rwhp + from pulley/tune exhaust etc from the factory. LS engine is stout for nos or NA i bet
Old 02-15-2012, 12:41 PM
  #30  
Member
 
King335i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CTS-V Coupe
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
Old 02-15-2012, 01:44 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
Hmmmmm..
Old 02-15-2012, 02:09 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
xtyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 E63 AMG
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.


The C63 can more than hold its own against the "big boy" CTS-V. I have eaten several of those for breakfast on both the street and at the strip. Granted they were minimally modded beyond stock (exhaust, pump gas tune, etc), but then again so am I with only a tune and exhaust.
Old 02-15-2012, 02:28 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
I never understood why guys that dont even have a benz come on benz forums and post... Whats the point? No friends maybe...



I am happy to just hang with a Viper in my 4 door grocery getter, that I can comfortable drive across the country if I wanted to with my bags in the back seat.

Not to mention when the po po roll up they are all over that Viper before even looking my way. Poser indeed.
Old 02-15-2012, 03:49 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
You can take the mullet out of the GM car, but you can't take the mullet out of the GM driver.

Old 02-15-2012, 07:12 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
^ LOL.

The CTS-V is a great car with huge potential. But Its very close to a C63 both with minor mods.


The viper was going to the shop for headers today, I was following in a truck and GTR pulls up.. We all merge onto the freeway and they both get into it... Viper was slowly walking on the GTR.. But it was verrryy close.
Old 02-15-2012, 08:50 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2012 C63 coupe
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
CTS-V and C63 with PP are almost identical in acceleration... not sure why you are suggesting it isn't "fast" like the big boy CTS-V. I would also not be putting other cars down about weight or transmission if I owned a CTS-V. Anemic rear tires? Yes.
Old 02-15-2012, 10:07 PM
  #37  
Super Member
 
Strafe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 583
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
2021 E63 S Sedan
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
I think king335i is "posing" as someone who thinks he knows something about cars.
Old 02-15-2012, 10:31 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by gthal
CTS-V and C63 with PP are almost identical in acceleration... not sure why you are suggesting it isn't "fast" like the big boy CTS-V. I would also not be putting other cars down about weight or transmission if I owned a CTS-V. Anemic rear tires? Yes.
Easily corrected.

Headers, tune and tires (R6's 255 front and 295 rear on 19 pound Forgestars) and you will leave the piggy V on a road course. If the V has pulley and tune he will heatsoak before the tires and brakes warm up.

Big Boys ???????? Gimme a break
Old 02-15-2012, 11:08 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
^how did you fit 295 tires? Grip must be insane.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:56 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jim Brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ and Newport Beach
Posts: 1,309
Received 86 Likes on 58 Posts
'22 G 63 AMG, '21 GLE 53 AMG, '20 NSX
The Vipers puts out around 525 lb ft of torque, has steamroller rear tires, weighs at least 400lbs less and loses less power through the drive train with a manual transmission. He will put the power down better.

Torque is acceleration, hp is top end. No shame in losing to an 8 litre Viper. He's got at least 100 ft lbs of torque up on you.
Old 02-16-2012, 02:38 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Jim Brady
The Vipers puts out around 525 lb ft of torque, has steamroller rear tires, weighs at least 400lbs less and loses less power through the drive train with a manual transmission. He will put the power down better.

Torque is acceleration, hp is top end. No shame in losing to an 8 litre Viper. He's got at least 100 ft lbs of torque up on you.
I agree.
Old 02-16-2012, 02:50 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,601
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
Originally Posted by Even Money
^how did you fit 295 tires? Grip must be insane.

If only it were true and you could do with out rubbing all the time. Given the C63 Front Engine RWD the car need at least 315 or 335 in back to hook up and not be all tail happy in the turns. I've got 315 on the back end of a Porsche Turbo and it eats them like pretzels
Old 02-16-2012, 07:32 AM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by Even Money
^how did you fit 295 tires? Grip must be insane.
Currently Selected Tire Size(s)
Size 295/30ZR18

Load Range UTQG Max LLMax Load = 1,235 lbs
Max psi = 44 psi
Treadwear: 40
Weight 24 lbs.
RimWidth 9.5-11"
Overall Diam. 25.3"


It's a lot of tire but within spec's. 17mm pads and small tire diameter provide the clearance. Can not take more than one passenger or it will rub severely.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:43 AM
  #44  
Super Member
 
Chocofishez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 723
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2014 E63 S
Originally Posted by hhughes1
Currently Selected Tire Size(s)
Size 295/30ZR18

Load Range UTQG Max LLMax Load = 1,235 lbs
Max psi = 44 psi
Treadwear: 40
Weight 24 lbs.
RimWidth 9.5-11"
Overall Diam. 25.3"


It's a lot of tire but within spec's. 17mm pads and small tire diameter provide the clearance. Can not take more than one passenger or it will rub severely.

Interesting.... Are you on stock suspension? Did you have to do any bodywork to your rear fenders?

I'm completely OEM and the difference in traction going from 255 -> 275s was staggering... makes me really curious about finding ways to get more rubber on the back.
Old 02-16-2012, 01:31 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by Chocofishez
Interesting.... Are you on stock suspension? Did you have to do any bodywork to your rear fenders?

I'm completely OEM and the difference in traction going from 255 -> 275s was staggering... makes me really curious about finding ways to get more rubber on the back.
I have H&R springs which lowered the car but they are stiffer. This is a track only setup which will rub with people in the back seat. It is worse with a 275/35 than the 285/30 or 295/30 because the 275 is much taller. You do need 9.5 inch wheels minimum for the Hoosiers and many brands limit the 9.5 rim to 275 tires.
Old 02-16-2012, 01:38 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Hoosiers are great tires. I'm going with their 315/30 on my next setup.
Old 02-16-2012, 01:58 PM
  #47  
Member
 
Baby Gorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
I do believe that it is more difficult than one would think to compare the C63 and the Viper. They are both very fast, but other than that their stock forms are VERY different cars built for very different purposes. Each has its own positives and negatives when compared with the other, but each is the best (or close to the best) at what it was made to do.

My C63 is, in my opinion, the BEST four-door sports sedan, daily driver, sleeper beast available (within my budget).

My GT500 is, in my opinion, the BEST example of raw American horsepower and torque, not a great daily driver but the most fun and best sounding car available (within my budget).

The GT500 is faster and better handling than the C63, but that's only because it is MUCH MUCH easier and MUCH cheaper to mod.

Last edited by Baby Gorilla; 02-16-2012 at 02:00 PM.
Old 02-16-2012, 02:01 PM
  #48  
Member
 
AMGFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by King335i
I think sometimes that everyone on this forum is deceived about, or in denial about, how fast the C63 actually is. Sure, compared to the Toyota Camry it's fast as all hell, astoundingly fast. But next to the big boys like the Viper, CTS-V, GT500, etc it is not actually all that fast. Anemic rear tires, porky curb weight, iffy transmission--these are not the makings of a truly fast car. It's almost as if the C63 is a better poser than it is a "sports car". But I'll be damned if they aren't one of the best looking sedans on the road today, and the difference in performance might not be noticeable in daily driving situations.
Take a look at this list: http://www.dragtimes.com/Cadillac--C...ag-Racing.html

How sad is it that a true LT/Tune Only full weight C63 such as mine is faster than every single CTS-V with full bolt-ons and pulleys?

And the few that are faster all have internal engine work/nitrous/race gas?

While I will say you are correct about the anemic rear tires I can't help but think that the rest of that statement was intended for describing the CTS-V itself....

"Porky Curb Weight" CTS-V 4300lbs vs C63 3924lbs

"Iffy Transmission" Please don't get me started on how garbage the 6L80 trans is. I have 200+ passes on my stock trans. I haven't broke it yet.
Old 02-16-2012, 02:41 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Gotta love guys that talk **** and then disappear...
Old 02-16-2012, 03:31 PM
  #50  
Member
 
SL63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c63 AMG
I personally like both cars, but you can bolt on a 2.8 kb supercharger on the V and be done with it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHexM...deo&playnext=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBX-e...deo&playnext=2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXC5a...ure=plpp_video


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Can't beat the pesky Viper



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.